{"title":"书评:恩斯特·库尔斯,音乐心理学","authors":"Y. Kim","doi":"10.1177/10298649221110680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his first monograph, based on his habilitation thesis, Ernst Kurth hinted at the prospect of defining music psychology (Kurth, 1913). He accomplished this approximately 18 years later when he published his final work, simply titled Musikpsychologie (Kurth, 1931). Opinions varied as to its success. While it was generally well received by music theorists, several contemporary psychologists viewed it less enthusiastically due to its lack of scientific rigor. According to them, Kurth himself does not appear convincing in his foreword to the book, which concludes with the following remarks:","PeriodicalId":47219,"journal":{"name":"Musicae Scientiae","volume":"66 1","pages":"811 - 815"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Ernst Kurth, Music psychology\",\"authors\":\"Y. Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10298649221110680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In his first monograph, based on his habilitation thesis, Ernst Kurth hinted at the prospect of defining music psychology (Kurth, 1913). He accomplished this approximately 18 years later when he published his final work, simply titled Musikpsychologie (Kurth, 1931). Opinions varied as to its success. While it was generally well received by music theorists, several contemporary psychologists viewed it less enthusiastically due to its lack of scientific rigor. According to them, Kurth himself does not appear convincing in his foreword to the book, which concludes with the following remarks:\",\"PeriodicalId\":47219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Musicae Scientiae\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"811 - 815\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Musicae Scientiae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10298649221110680\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musicae Scientiae","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10298649221110680","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
In his first monograph, based on his habilitation thesis, Ernst Kurth hinted at the prospect of defining music psychology (Kurth, 1913). He accomplished this approximately 18 years later when he published his final work, simply titled Musikpsychologie (Kurth, 1931). Opinions varied as to its success. While it was generally well received by music theorists, several contemporary psychologists viewed it less enthusiastically due to its lack of scientific rigor. According to them, Kurth himself does not appear convincing in his foreword to the book, which concludes with the following remarks: