HIV知识、感知风险和性别作为非裔美国人唾液HIV快速检测的调节因子。

P. Foster, S. Dalmida, G. McDougall
{"title":"HIV知识、感知风险和性别作为非裔美国人唾液HIV快速检测的调节因子。","authors":"P. Foster, S. Dalmida, G. McDougall","doi":"10.17140/HARTOJ-SE-1-105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nOf more than 1.2 million people in the United States (US) living with HIV infection, almost 1 in 8 (12.8%) are unaware of their infection. The introduction of a rapid HIV test using a saliva sample in 2004 made immediate results possible in community-based settings. Despite use of salivary rapid testing (SRT) over the last ten years, not enough is known about barriers to and acceptability of SRT among African Americans (AAs).\n\n\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with SRT for HIV among AAs.\n\n\nMethods\nA cross-sectional study was conducted with 329 AA men and women recruited from a sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinic.\n\n\nResults\nResults of study showed that participants with higher AIDS knowledge (p<0.001) and problem-focused coping (p<0.003) tended to have higher likelihood for participation in testing. In terms of seeking medical help, participants with lower emotional-focused coping, lower risky behavior and higher AIDS knowledge tended to be more likely to seek medical help (p=0.015, p<0.001, p<0.04, respectively). Female participants with higher values of risky behavior tended to be more likely to participate in testing (p=0.001).\n\n\nConclusions\nThe findings support the need to assess barriers and facilitators to testing decisions in order to increase testing rates. In particular, AIDS knowledge and either problem or emotional-focused coping and risky behaviors, based on gender may be important in making testing and care entry decisions.","PeriodicalId":91492,"journal":{"name":"HIV/AIDS research and treatment : open journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"S31-S37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HIV Knowledge, Perceived Risk and Gender as Modulators of Salivary HIV Rapid Testing in African Americans.\",\"authors\":\"P. Foster, S. Dalmida, G. McDougall\",\"doi\":\"10.17140/HARTOJ-SE-1-105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background\\nOf more than 1.2 million people in the United States (US) living with HIV infection, almost 1 in 8 (12.8%) are unaware of their infection. The introduction of a rapid HIV test using a saliva sample in 2004 made immediate results possible in community-based settings. Despite use of salivary rapid testing (SRT) over the last ten years, not enough is known about barriers to and acceptability of SRT among African Americans (AAs).\\n\\n\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with SRT for HIV among AAs.\\n\\n\\nMethods\\nA cross-sectional study was conducted with 329 AA men and women recruited from a sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinic.\\n\\n\\nResults\\nResults of study showed that participants with higher AIDS knowledge (p<0.001) and problem-focused coping (p<0.003) tended to have higher likelihood for participation in testing. In terms of seeking medical help, participants with lower emotional-focused coping, lower risky behavior and higher AIDS knowledge tended to be more likely to seek medical help (p=0.015, p<0.001, p<0.04, respectively). Female participants with higher values of risky behavior tended to be more likely to participate in testing (p=0.001).\\n\\n\\nConclusions\\nThe findings support the need to assess barriers and facilitators to testing decisions in order to increase testing rates. In particular, AIDS knowledge and either problem or emotional-focused coping and risky behaviors, based on gender may be important in making testing and care entry decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HIV/AIDS research and treatment : open journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"S31-S37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HIV/AIDS research and treatment : open journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17140/HARTOJ-SE-1-105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIV/AIDS research and treatment : open journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17140/HARTOJ-SE-1-105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国超过120万的HIV感染者中,几乎八分之一(12.8%)的人没有意识到自己的感染。2004年采用的使用唾液样本的快速艾滋病毒检测使得在社区环境中能够立即取得结果。尽管在过去十年中使用了唾液快速检测(SRT),但对非裔美国人(AAs)中SRT的障碍和可接受性的了解还不够。目的本研究的目的是确定aids患者中与SRT相关的因素。方法采用横断面研究方法,从某性传播感染(STI)门诊招募329名AA男性和女性。结果研究结果显示,艾滋病知识水平高(p<0.001)和问题关注型应对能力强(p<0.003)的被试参加测试的可能性更高。在寻求医疗帮助方面,情绪聚焦性应对水平较低、危险行为水平较低、艾滋病知识水平较高的被试更倾向于寻求医疗帮助(p=0.015, p<0.001, p<0.04)。具有较高危险行为值的女性参与者更有可能参加测试(p=0.001)。结论研究结果支持评估检测决策的障碍和促进因素以提高检测率的必要性。特别是,基于性别的艾滋病知识以及问题或以情感为中心的应对和危险行为可能对进行检测和进入护理的决定很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HIV Knowledge, Perceived Risk and Gender as Modulators of Salivary HIV Rapid Testing in African Americans.
Background Of more than 1.2 million people in the United States (US) living with HIV infection, almost 1 in 8 (12.8%) are unaware of their infection. The introduction of a rapid HIV test using a saliva sample in 2004 made immediate results possible in community-based settings. Despite use of salivary rapid testing (SRT) over the last ten years, not enough is known about barriers to and acceptability of SRT among African Americans (AAs). Purpose The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with SRT for HIV among AAs. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted with 329 AA men and women recruited from a sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinic. Results Results of study showed that participants with higher AIDS knowledge (p<0.001) and problem-focused coping (p<0.003) tended to have higher likelihood for participation in testing. In terms of seeking medical help, participants with lower emotional-focused coping, lower risky behavior and higher AIDS knowledge tended to be more likely to seek medical help (p=0.015, p<0.001, p<0.04, respectively). Female participants with higher values of risky behavior tended to be more likely to participate in testing (p=0.001). Conclusions The findings support the need to assess barriers and facilitators to testing decisions in order to increase testing rates. In particular, AIDS knowledge and either problem or emotional-focused coping and risky behaviors, based on gender may be important in making testing and care entry decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Evaluation of the Measures to Reduce the Impact of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome in Zimbabwe and Report on the Achievements Made to Date Identifying Resource Needs and Experiences of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Questioning+ Community during the Coronavirus Disease-2019 Pandemic The Stopping the Spread of Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome through Relationship Engagement Study: An Opportunity for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Prevention in African American Adolescents with HIV-Positive Mothers Towards a More Sustainable Response: Strengthening the Social Agenda in the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome Epidemic The Time is Now for Disruptive Innovation in Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Adherence Monitoring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1