{"title":"网络模糊评价方法","authors":"M. Voskoglou","doi":"10.1109/INTELCIS.2015.7397189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The assessment of a system's performance is a very important task for its operation, because the results obtained by this action help the designer/user of the system to correct its weaknesses, thus making it more effective. The assessment methods usually utilized in practice are based on the principles of classical, bivalent logic (yes-no). However, in our everyday life they frequently appear assessment situations involving a degree of uncertainty and (or) ambiguity. Fuzzy logic, due to its nature of characterizing a case with multiple values, offers rich resources for dealing with such kind of situations. This gave us several times in past the impulse to apply principles of fuzzy logic for assessment purposes using as tools the corresponding system's total uncertainty (e.g. see [2] and its relevant references, Section of [3], etc) the Center of Gravity (COG) defuzzification technique (e.g. Section of [3], [4], etc) as well as the Triangular (TFAM) (e.g. [1]) and Trapezoidal (TRFAM) (e.g. [5]) Fuzzy Assessment Models, which are recently developed variations of the COG technique. In this presentation we shall use the Fuzzy Numbers (FNs), and in particular the Triangular (TFN) (e.g. [6]) and Trapezoidal (TpFN) Fuzzy Numbers, as an alternative assessment tool. FNs play a fundamental role in fuzzy mathematics, analogous to the role played by the ordinary numbers in classical mathematics. Our results are illustrated by an example, while this alternative assessment approach is compared with the assessment methods of the bivalent (calculation of the means, GPA index) and fuzzy logic (see above) that we have already used in earlier works.","PeriodicalId":6478,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Information Systems (ICICIS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cyber fuzzy assessment methods\",\"authors\":\"M. Voskoglou\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INTELCIS.2015.7397189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The assessment of a system's performance is a very important task for its operation, because the results obtained by this action help the designer/user of the system to correct its weaknesses, thus making it more effective. The assessment methods usually utilized in practice are based on the principles of classical, bivalent logic (yes-no). However, in our everyday life they frequently appear assessment situations involving a degree of uncertainty and (or) ambiguity. Fuzzy logic, due to its nature of characterizing a case with multiple values, offers rich resources for dealing with such kind of situations. This gave us several times in past the impulse to apply principles of fuzzy logic for assessment purposes using as tools the corresponding system's total uncertainty (e.g. see [2] and its relevant references, Section of [3], etc) the Center of Gravity (COG) defuzzification technique (e.g. Section of [3], [4], etc) as well as the Triangular (TFAM) (e.g. [1]) and Trapezoidal (TRFAM) (e.g. [5]) Fuzzy Assessment Models, which are recently developed variations of the COG technique. In this presentation we shall use the Fuzzy Numbers (FNs), and in particular the Triangular (TFN) (e.g. [6]) and Trapezoidal (TpFN) Fuzzy Numbers, as an alternative assessment tool. FNs play a fundamental role in fuzzy mathematics, analogous to the role played by the ordinary numbers in classical mathematics. Our results are illustrated by an example, while this alternative assessment approach is compared with the assessment methods of the bivalent (calculation of the means, GPA index) and fuzzy logic (see above) that we have already used in earlier works.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Information Systems (ICICIS)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Information Systems (ICICIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INTELCIS.2015.7397189\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Information Systems (ICICIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INTELCIS.2015.7397189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估系统的性能对系统的运行是一项非常重要的任务,因为通过评估获得的结果可以帮助系统的设计者/使用者纠正其弱点,从而使系统更加有效。通常在实践中使用的评估方法是基于经典的二值逻辑(是-否)原则。然而,在我们的日常生活中,他们经常出现评估情况涉及一定程度的不确定性和(或)模糊性。模糊逻辑以其具有多值特征的特性,为处理这类情况提供了丰富的资源。这使我们在过去几次有了将模糊逻辑原理应用于评估目的的动力,使用相应系统的总不确定性作为工具(例如参见[2]及其相关参考文献,[3]的Section等),重心(COG)去模糊化技术(例如[3]的Section,[4]等)以及三角形(TFAM)(例如[1])和梯形(TRFAM)(例如[5])模糊评估模型,它们是COG技术的最新发展变种。在本演示中,我们将使用模糊数(FNs),特别是三角形(TFN)(例如b[6])和梯形(TpFN)模糊数作为替代评估工具。fn在模糊数学中扮演着基础性的角色,类似于普通数字在经典数学中所扮演的角色。通过一个例子说明了我们的结果,同时将这种替代评估方法与我们在早期工作中已经使用的二价(计算平均值,GPA指数)和模糊逻辑(见上文)的评估方法进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cyber fuzzy assessment methods
The assessment of a system's performance is a very important task for its operation, because the results obtained by this action help the designer/user of the system to correct its weaknesses, thus making it more effective. The assessment methods usually utilized in practice are based on the principles of classical, bivalent logic (yes-no). However, in our everyday life they frequently appear assessment situations involving a degree of uncertainty and (or) ambiguity. Fuzzy logic, due to its nature of characterizing a case with multiple values, offers rich resources for dealing with such kind of situations. This gave us several times in past the impulse to apply principles of fuzzy logic for assessment purposes using as tools the corresponding system's total uncertainty (e.g. see [2] and its relevant references, Section of [3], etc) the Center of Gravity (COG) defuzzification technique (e.g. Section of [3], [4], etc) as well as the Triangular (TFAM) (e.g. [1]) and Trapezoidal (TRFAM) (e.g. [5]) Fuzzy Assessment Models, which are recently developed variations of the COG technique. In this presentation we shall use the Fuzzy Numbers (FNs), and in particular the Triangular (TFN) (e.g. [6]) and Trapezoidal (TpFN) Fuzzy Numbers, as an alternative assessment tool. FNs play a fundamental role in fuzzy mathematics, analogous to the role played by the ordinary numbers in classical mathematics. Our results are illustrated by an example, while this alternative assessment approach is compared with the assessment methods of the bivalent (calculation of the means, GPA index) and fuzzy logic (see above) that we have already used in earlier works.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the use of probabilistic model-checking for the verification of prognostics applications Prospective, knowledge based clinical risk analysis: The OPT-model Partial deduction in predicate calculus as a tool for artificial intelligence problem complexity decreasing XML summarization: A survey Finding the pin in the haystack: A Bot Traceback service for public clouds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1