必不可少却被排除在外:COVID-19 和巴西家庭佣工体面工作的不足

IF 2.8 4区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS International Labour Review Pub Date : 2023-06-29 DOI:10.1111/ilr.12402
Louisa ACCIARI, Chirlene DOS SANTOS BRITO, Cleide PEREIRA PINTO
{"title":"必不可少却被排除在外:COVID-19 和巴西家庭佣工体面工作的不足","authors":"Louisa ACCIARI,&nbsp;Chirlene DOS SANTOS BRITO,&nbsp;Cleide PEREIRA PINTO","doi":"10.1111/ilr.12402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>This article presents data from a survey conducted with the National Federation of Domestic Workers of Brazil on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on domestic workers, also considering emergency policies and the Federation's main actions in the first year of the crisis. Focusing on employment and income, occupational health and safety, and violations of rights, it shows the extreme polarization between those who lost their livelihoods and those obliged to continue working at the expense of their health and basic human rights. Although the circumstances were exceptional, the authors argue that this situation was made possible by pre-existing conditions of legal exclusion and precarity.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47216,"journal":{"name":"International Labour Review","volume":"163 1","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ilr.12402","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Essential yet excluded: COVID-19 and the decent work deficit among domestic workers in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Louisa ACCIARI,&nbsp;Chirlene DOS SANTOS BRITO,&nbsp;Cleide PEREIRA PINTO\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ilr.12402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>This article presents data from a survey conducted with the National Federation of Domestic Workers of Brazil on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on domestic workers, also considering emergency policies and the Federation's main actions in the first year of the crisis. Focusing on employment and income, occupational health and safety, and violations of rights, it shows the extreme polarization between those who lost their livelihoods and those obliged to continue working at the expense of their health and basic human rights. Although the circumstances were exceptional, the authors argue that this situation was made possible by pre-existing conditions of legal exclusion and precarity.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Labour Review\",\"volume\":\"163 1\",\"pages\":\"1-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ilr.12402\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Labour Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ilr.12402\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Labour Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ilr.12402","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了与巴西全国家政工人联合会合作开展的一项调查所获得的数据,该调查涉及 COVID-19 大流行病对家政工人的影响,同时还考虑了危机第一年的应急政策和联合会的主要行动。报告以就业和收入、职业健康和安全以及侵权行为为重点,显示了失去生计者与不得不牺牲健康和基本人权继续工作者之间的极端两极分化。虽然情况特殊,但作者认为,这种情况是由于之前存在的法律排斥和不稳定性造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Essential yet excluded: COVID-19 and the decent work deficit among domestic workers in Brazil

This article presents data from a survey conducted with the National Federation of Domestic Workers of Brazil on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on domestic workers, also considering emergency policies and the Federation's main actions in the first year of the crisis. Focusing on employment and income, occupational health and safety, and violations of rights, it shows the extreme polarization between those who lost their livelihoods and those obliged to continue working at the expense of their health and basic human rights. Although the circumstances were exceptional, the authors argue that this situation was made possible by pre-existing conditions of legal exclusion and precarity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The International Labour Review is the world"s leading multidisciplinary journal of labour market institutions and economics. Its aim is to advance academic research and inform policy debate and decision-making in these fields by bringing together the original thinking of lawyers, economists, sociologists, political scientists and industrial relations specialists on a broad range of labour market policy and social protection concerns. The International Labour Review also features concise reports on current developments considered to be of particular interest to those working in these fields and reviews of recent major publications. It is committed to an editorial policy that combines accessibility with rigorous, insightful analysis and the highest scholarly standards.
期刊最新文献
The persistence of informality in paid domestic work in Argentina Introduction: The formalization of paid domestic work – Current trajectories and challenges ahead Issue Information – TOC From dead letter to functional policy? Domestic workers' rights and “disformality” in Peru Domestic workers' organizations and participatory approaches to labour standards enforcement: The case of Jamaica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1