基于多目标规划法的网络DEA模型中决策单位生产率测度的新方法

Jafar Esmaeeli, M. Amiri, H. Taghizadeh
{"title":"基于多目标规划法的网络DEA模型中决策单位生产率测度的新方法","authors":"Jafar Esmaeeli, M. Amiri, H. Taghizadeh","doi":"10.22068/IJIEPR.33.2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"So far, numerous studies have been developed to evaluate the performance of “Decision-Making Units (DMUs)” through “Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)” and “Network Data Envelopment Analysis (NDEA)” models in different places, but most of these studies have measured the performance of DMUs by efficiency criteria. The productivity is considered as a key factor in the success and development of DMUs and its evaluation is more comprehensive than efficiency evaluation. Recently, studies have been developed to evaluate the productivity of DMUs through the mentioned models but firstly, the number of these studies especially in NDEA models is scarce, and secondly, productivity in these studies is often evaluated through the “productivity indexes”. These indexes require at least two time periods and also the two important elements of efficiency and effectiveness in these studies are not significantly evident. So, the purpose of this study is to develop a new approach in the NDEA models using “Multi-Objective Programming (MOP)” method in order to measure productivity of DMUs through efficiency and effectiveness “simultaneously, in one stage, in a period, and interdependently”. “Simultaneous and single-stage” study provides the advantage of sensitivity analysis in the model. One case study demonstrates application of the proposed approach in the branches of a Bank. Using proposed approach revealed that it is possible for a branch to be efficient by considering its subdivisions separately but not be efficient by considering the conjunction between its subdivisions. In addition, a branch may be efficient by considering the conjunction between its subdivisions but not be productive. Efficient branches are not necessarily productive, but productive branches are also efficient.","PeriodicalId":52223,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Production Research","volume":"47 1","pages":"221-240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new approach in the network DEA models for measurement of productivity of decision-making units using multi-objective programming method\",\"authors\":\"Jafar Esmaeeli, M. Amiri, H. Taghizadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.22068/IJIEPR.33.2.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"So far, numerous studies have been developed to evaluate the performance of “Decision-Making Units (DMUs)” through “Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)” and “Network Data Envelopment Analysis (NDEA)” models in different places, but most of these studies have measured the performance of DMUs by efficiency criteria. The productivity is considered as a key factor in the success and development of DMUs and its evaluation is more comprehensive than efficiency evaluation. Recently, studies have been developed to evaluate the productivity of DMUs through the mentioned models but firstly, the number of these studies especially in NDEA models is scarce, and secondly, productivity in these studies is often evaluated through the “productivity indexes”. These indexes require at least two time periods and also the two important elements of efficiency and effectiveness in these studies are not significantly evident. So, the purpose of this study is to develop a new approach in the NDEA models using “Multi-Objective Programming (MOP)” method in order to measure productivity of DMUs through efficiency and effectiveness “simultaneously, in one stage, in a period, and interdependently”. “Simultaneous and single-stage” study provides the advantage of sensitivity analysis in the model. One case study demonstrates application of the proposed approach in the branches of a Bank. Using proposed approach revealed that it is possible for a branch to be efficient by considering its subdivisions separately but not be efficient by considering the conjunction between its subdivisions. In addition, a branch may be efficient by considering the conjunction between its subdivisions but not be productive. Efficient branches are not necessarily productive, but productive branches are also efficient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Production Research\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"221-240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Production Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22068/IJIEPR.33.2.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Decision Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Production Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22068/IJIEPR.33.2.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

迄今为止,各地已经开展了大量研究,通过“数据包络分析(DEA)”和“网络数据包络分析(NDEA)”模型来评估“决策单元”的绩效,但这些研究大多以效率标准来衡量决策单元的绩效。生产率被认为是决策单元成功和发展的关键因素,其评价比效率评价更为全面。近年来,已有研究通过上述模型来评价dmu的生产率,但首先,这些研究的数量较少,特别是在NDEA模型中,其次,这些研究中的生产率往往是通过“生产率指标”来评价的。这些指标至少需要两个时间段,而且效率和有效性这两个重要因素在这些研究中并不明显。因此,本研究的目的是利用“多目标规划(Multi-Objective Programming, MOP)”方法,在NDEA模型中开发一种新的方法,通过“同时、在一个阶段、在一个时期、相互依赖”的效率和有效性来衡量dmu的生产力。“同时单阶段”研究提供了模型敏感性分析的优势。一个案例研究演示了该方法在某银行分支机构中的应用。使用所提出的方法表明,分支可以通过单独考虑其子分支来提高效率,但如果考虑其子分支之间的连接则无法提高效率。此外,一个分支通过考虑其分支之间的连接可能是有效的,但不是生产性的。高效的分支不一定是高效的,但高效的分支也是高效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A new approach in the network DEA models for measurement of productivity of decision-making units using multi-objective programming method
So far, numerous studies have been developed to evaluate the performance of “Decision-Making Units (DMUs)” through “Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)” and “Network Data Envelopment Analysis (NDEA)” models in different places, but most of these studies have measured the performance of DMUs by efficiency criteria. The productivity is considered as a key factor in the success and development of DMUs and its evaluation is more comprehensive than efficiency evaluation. Recently, studies have been developed to evaluate the productivity of DMUs through the mentioned models but firstly, the number of these studies especially in NDEA models is scarce, and secondly, productivity in these studies is often evaluated through the “productivity indexes”. These indexes require at least two time periods and also the two important elements of efficiency and effectiveness in these studies are not significantly evident. So, the purpose of this study is to develop a new approach in the NDEA models using “Multi-Objective Programming (MOP)” method in order to measure productivity of DMUs through efficiency and effectiveness “simultaneously, in one stage, in a period, and interdependently”. “Simultaneous and single-stage” study provides the advantage of sensitivity analysis in the model. One case study demonstrates application of the proposed approach in the branches of a Bank. Using proposed approach revealed that it is possible for a branch to be efficient by considering its subdivisions separately but not be efficient by considering the conjunction between its subdivisions. In addition, a branch may be efficient by considering the conjunction between its subdivisions but not be productive. Efficient branches are not necessarily productive, but productive branches are also efficient.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Production Research
International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Production Research Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Literature Review on Optimization Techniques Used for Minimization of Casting Design and Development of Foldable Electric Bicycle The Environmental Innovation and the Sustainability of the Economic Unit: A Review Effect of Content Marketing on Industrial Segmentation: An Applied Study in Iraqi Telecommunication and Public Company Design and Fabrication of Multifunctional, Portable and Economical Agriculture Machine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1