教育专业人员的显性语音知识

Jane L. D. Carroll, G. Gillon, Brigid C McNeill
{"title":"教育专业人员的显性语音知识","authors":"Jane L. D. Carroll, G. Gillon, Brigid C McNeill","doi":"10.1179/136132812804731820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study examined the phonological awareness skills of 699 education professionals and paraprofessionals working in New Zealand primary schools. Performance in a phonological awareness test was compared across speech-language pathologists (SLPs, n = 34), primary school teachers (n = 208), teacher aides (n = 49), Resource Teachers of Literacy (RTLits, n = 80), Resource Teachers of Learning and Behavior (RTLBs, n = 26), early childhood educators (ECEs, n = 51), third year College of Education students (3YRBT, n = 98), and first-year College of Education students (1YRBT, n = 153). The results indicated large variability in New Zealand educators' capacity to segment words into sounds. SLPs performed at near ceiling (98% accuracy), whereas junior school teachers performed at 74% accuracy, teacher aides at 63%, ECEs at 56%, RTLits at 89%, RTLBs at 78%, 3rd year College of Education students at 68%, and 1st year College of Education students at 55%. The data suggest professional development in phonological awareness for all the educators as well as pre service teachers and teacher aides is warranted.","PeriodicalId":88385,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific journal of speech, language, and hearing","volume":"1 1","pages":"231 - 244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explicit Phonological Knowledge of Educational Professionals\",\"authors\":\"Jane L. D. Carroll, G. Gillon, Brigid C McNeill\",\"doi\":\"10.1179/136132812804731820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study examined the phonological awareness skills of 699 education professionals and paraprofessionals working in New Zealand primary schools. Performance in a phonological awareness test was compared across speech-language pathologists (SLPs, n = 34), primary school teachers (n = 208), teacher aides (n = 49), Resource Teachers of Literacy (RTLits, n = 80), Resource Teachers of Learning and Behavior (RTLBs, n = 26), early childhood educators (ECEs, n = 51), third year College of Education students (3YRBT, n = 98), and first-year College of Education students (1YRBT, n = 153). The results indicated large variability in New Zealand educators' capacity to segment words into sounds. SLPs performed at near ceiling (98% accuracy), whereas junior school teachers performed at 74% accuracy, teacher aides at 63%, ECEs at 56%, RTLits at 89%, RTLBs at 78%, 3rd year College of Education students at 68%, and 1st year College of Education students at 55%. The data suggest professional development in phonological awareness for all the educators as well as pre service teachers and teacher aides is warranted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific journal of speech, language, and hearing\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"231 - 244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"38\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific journal of speech, language, and hearing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1179/136132812804731820\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific journal of speech, language, and hearing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/136132812804731820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

摘要

摘要本研究调查了新西兰小学699名教育专业人员和辅助专业人员的语音意识技能。比较了语言病理学家(slp, n = 34)、小学教师(n = 208)、教师助理(n = 49)、扫盲资源教师(RTLits, n = 80)、学习与行为资源教师(RTLBs, n = 26)、幼儿教育工作者(ECEs, n = 51)、教育学院三年级学生(3YRBT, n = 98)和教育学院一年级学生(1YRBT, n = 153)在语音意识测试中的表现。结果表明,新西兰教育工作者将单词分割成声音的能力存在很大差异。slp的准确率接近上限(98%),而初中教师的准确率为74%,教师助理为63%,eca为56%,rtlit为89%,rtlb为78%,教育学院三年级学生为68%,教育学院一年级学生为55%。这些数据表明,所有教育工作者以及职前教师和教师助理都有必要在语音意识方面进行专业发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Explicit Phonological Knowledge of Educational Professionals
Abstract This study examined the phonological awareness skills of 699 education professionals and paraprofessionals working in New Zealand primary schools. Performance in a phonological awareness test was compared across speech-language pathologists (SLPs, n = 34), primary school teachers (n = 208), teacher aides (n = 49), Resource Teachers of Literacy (RTLits, n = 80), Resource Teachers of Learning and Behavior (RTLBs, n = 26), early childhood educators (ECEs, n = 51), third year College of Education students (3YRBT, n = 98), and first-year College of Education students (1YRBT, n = 153). The results indicated large variability in New Zealand educators' capacity to segment words into sounds. SLPs performed at near ceiling (98% accuracy), whereas junior school teachers performed at 74% accuracy, teacher aides at 63%, ECEs at 56%, RTLits at 89%, RTLBs at 78%, 3rd year College of Education students at 68%, and 1st year College of Education students at 55%. The data suggest professional development in phonological awareness for all the educators as well as pre service teachers and teacher aides is warranted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Presence of Stop Bursts and Multiple Bursts in Younger and Older Adults Effects of Memory Aids on the Conversations of Elderly Chinese Persons Subject Index: Volume 15, Numbers 1–4 Explicit Phonological Knowledge of Educational Professionals Author Index: Volume 15, Numbers 1–4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1