为有机农产品支付高价的意愿:一项计量经济学分析

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal of Food Distribution Research Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.22004/AG.ECON.274577
R. Govindasamy, S. Arumugam, Isaac Vellangany, B. Ozkan
{"title":"为有机农产品支付高价的意愿:一项计量经济学分析","authors":"R. Govindasamy, S. Arumugam, Isaac Vellangany, B. Ozkan","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.274577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"U.S. consumer demand for organically produced goods has grown continuously since the USDA established national standards for organic production and processing in 2002 (www.USDA.gov). Organic food sales have increased from approximately $11 billion in 2004 to an estimated $35.9 billion in 2015. As previous literature suggests, a large portion of consumers view organics favorably, but very few routinely choose to buy organic food over conventional food. It is assumed that this is due to—among other things— socioeconomic disparities. The objective of this paper is to predict the characteristics of consumers who are willing to pay high premiums for organic produce in the mid-Atlantic United States. In the context of this paper, a high premium is defined as at least 16% more for organic fruits and vegetables compared to conventional produce. Data were collected from 1,100 consumers using a private online survey company. A logit model was developed to predict which consumers are more likely to pay a high premium for organic produce. Results indicate that the overall model is highly significant, with a correct prediction rate of 71%. Those who have a graduate degree and an annual income above $100,000 are more likely to pay high premiums. Moreover, those who use food advertisements, certified organic labels, and natural labels to purchase produce are more likely to pay high premiums. Caucasians are more likely to pay high premiums, as are those who frequently buy at farm direct markets. As expected, consumers who think that organic food tastes better than conventional food and those who switch supermarkets to buy organic produce are more likely to pay high premiums. Those who want to buy organic jam, jelly, marmalade, juices, sauces, and dried chips are more likely to pay a high premium for organic produce. Those who regularly shop at more than one food store are less likely to pay a high premium. The model indicates that those who are influenced by the naturally grown label and prefer conventionally grown but local produce are less likely to pay high premiums. Those who consider buying organic food to be a waste of money are less likely to pay a high premium for organic fresh fruits and vegetables. Producers of organic vegetables and fruits can target customers with these specific traits to enhance their profitability.","PeriodicalId":36788,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Distribution Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"103-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Willingness to Pay a High-Premium for Organic Produce: An Econometric Analysis\",\"authors\":\"R. Govindasamy, S. Arumugam, Isaac Vellangany, B. Ozkan\",\"doi\":\"10.22004/AG.ECON.274577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"U.S. consumer demand for organically produced goods has grown continuously since the USDA established national standards for organic production and processing in 2002 (www.USDA.gov). Organic food sales have increased from approximately $11 billion in 2004 to an estimated $35.9 billion in 2015. As previous literature suggests, a large portion of consumers view organics favorably, but very few routinely choose to buy organic food over conventional food. It is assumed that this is due to—among other things— socioeconomic disparities. The objective of this paper is to predict the characteristics of consumers who are willing to pay high premiums for organic produce in the mid-Atlantic United States. In the context of this paper, a high premium is defined as at least 16% more for organic fruits and vegetables compared to conventional produce. Data were collected from 1,100 consumers using a private online survey company. A logit model was developed to predict which consumers are more likely to pay a high premium for organic produce. Results indicate that the overall model is highly significant, with a correct prediction rate of 71%. Those who have a graduate degree and an annual income above $100,000 are more likely to pay high premiums. Moreover, those who use food advertisements, certified organic labels, and natural labels to purchase produce are more likely to pay high premiums. Caucasians are more likely to pay high premiums, as are those who frequently buy at farm direct markets. As expected, consumers who think that organic food tastes better than conventional food and those who switch supermarkets to buy organic produce are more likely to pay high premiums. Those who want to buy organic jam, jelly, marmalade, juices, sauces, and dried chips are more likely to pay a high premium for organic produce. Those who regularly shop at more than one food store are less likely to pay a high premium. The model indicates that those who are influenced by the naturally grown label and prefer conventionally grown but local produce are less likely to pay high premiums. Those who consider buying organic food to be a waste of money are less likely to pay a high premium for organic fresh fruits and vegetables. Producers of organic vegetables and fruits can target customers with these specific traits to enhance their profitability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Distribution Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"103-104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Distribution Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.274577\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Distribution Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.274577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

自2002年美国农业部制定了有机生产和加工的国家标准以来,美国消费者对有机产品的需求持续增长(www.USDA.gov)。有机食品销售额从2004年的约110亿美元增加到2015年的约359亿美元。正如之前的文献所表明的那样,大部分消费者对有机食品持积极态度,但很少有人经常选择购买有机食品而不是传统食品。据推测,这是由于社会经济差异造成的。本文的目的是预测在美国大西洋中部愿意为有机农产品支付高额溢价的消费者的特征。在本文的背景下,高溢价被定义为有机水果和蔬菜与传统农产品相比至少高出16%。数据是通过一家私人在线调查公司从1100名消费者中收集的。开发了一个logit模型来预测哪些消费者更有可能为有机产品支付更高的溢价。结果表明,整体模型具有显著性,预测正确率为71%。那些拥有研究生学位、年收入超过10万美元的人更有可能支付高额保费。此外,那些使用食品广告、有机认证标签和天然标签购买农产品的人更有可能支付更高的溢价。白种人更有可能支付更高的保费,就像那些经常在农场直接市场购买的人一样。不出所料,认为有机食品比传统食品味道更好的消费者和那些转向超市购买有机农产品的消费者更有可能支付更高的溢价。那些想要购买有机果酱、果冻、橘子酱、果汁、酱汁和干薯片的人更有可能为有机农产品支付更高的溢价。那些经常在不止一家食品店购物的人不太可能支付高溢价。该模型表明,那些受自然生长标签影响、更喜欢传统种植但当地产品的人,不太可能支付高昂的保费。那些认为购买有机食品是浪费钱的人不太可能花高价购买有机新鲜水果和蔬菜。有机蔬菜和水果的生产者可以针对这些特定特征的客户,以提高他们的盈利能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Willingness to Pay a High-Premium for Organic Produce: An Econometric Analysis
U.S. consumer demand for organically produced goods has grown continuously since the USDA established national standards for organic production and processing in 2002 (www.USDA.gov). Organic food sales have increased from approximately $11 billion in 2004 to an estimated $35.9 billion in 2015. As previous literature suggests, a large portion of consumers view organics favorably, but very few routinely choose to buy organic food over conventional food. It is assumed that this is due to—among other things— socioeconomic disparities. The objective of this paper is to predict the characteristics of consumers who are willing to pay high premiums for organic produce in the mid-Atlantic United States. In the context of this paper, a high premium is defined as at least 16% more for organic fruits and vegetables compared to conventional produce. Data were collected from 1,100 consumers using a private online survey company. A logit model was developed to predict which consumers are more likely to pay a high premium for organic produce. Results indicate that the overall model is highly significant, with a correct prediction rate of 71%. Those who have a graduate degree and an annual income above $100,000 are more likely to pay high premiums. Moreover, those who use food advertisements, certified organic labels, and natural labels to purchase produce are more likely to pay high premiums. Caucasians are more likely to pay high premiums, as are those who frequently buy at farm direct markets. As expected, consumers who think that organic food tastes better than conventional food and those who switch supermarkets to buy organic produce are more likely to pay high premiums. Those who want to buy organic jam, jelly, marmalade, juices, sauces, and dried chips are more likely to pay a high premium for organic produce. Those who regularly shop at more than one food store are less likely to pay a high premium. The model indicates that those who are influenced by the naturally grown label and prefer conventionally grown but local produce are less likely to pay high premiums. Those who consider buying organic food to be a waste of money are less likely to pay a high premium for organic fresh fruits and vegetables. Producers of organic vegetables and fruits can target customers with these specific traits to enhance their profitability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Distribution Research
Journal of Food Distribution Research Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Adoption of Drying Added-Value Technologies in the Specialty Crop Industry The Consumer Choice of Market for Fresh Fruits: A Study of Attitudinal Factors and Market Attributes Consumer Preferences for Direct-to-Consumer Value-Added Agriculture in North Carolina: Preliminary Findings of Consumer Focus Groups Outreach Efforts at Standardizing Farm to Institution Reporting Metrics Factors Influencing Fruit and Vegetable Farmers’ Willingness to Participate in Market Outlets with a Food Justice Mission: The Case of Fresh Stop Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1