在线教师外包专业发展:来自研究的建议

Ling Zhao, R. Dixon, Tonia A. Dousay, A. Carr-Chellman
{"title":"在线教师外包专业发展:来自研究的建议","authors":"Ling Zhao, R. Dixon, Tonia A. Dousay, A. Carr-Chellman","doi":"10.1145/3532688.3529094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To improve the quality of online teaching, institutions typically provide structured professional development in the form of institutional teaching or learning center programming. This programming typically focuses on teaching and learning quality, transitions to online teaching, pedagogies, and new technologies. This article reports on the use of outsourced professional development along with faculty responses to the program. Use of an outsourced program was attractive to faculty who wanted to have another institution's name on their vita. Seventeen faculty completed the professional development program and eight shared their reflections on this inquiry. With a focus on translating research to practice, the article lays out a series of recommendations for future professional development for online instruction including attention to prior knowledge, personalizing approaches, targeting both introductory and advanced learner needs, integrating a community of practice with specific roles, reviewing all materials prior to implementation to ensure tailored program, allowing faculty choice across content, formative and summative evaluation to determine effectiveness including learner perceptions, learner analytics, and content review for current and emerging practice and innovation.","PeriodicalId":72732,"journal":{"name":"Current issues in emerging elearning","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outsourced Professional Development for Online Instructors: Recommendations from research\",\"authors\":\"Ling Zhao, R. Dixon, Tonia A. Dousay, A. Carr-Chellman\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3532688.3529094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To improve the quality of online teaching, institutions typically provide structured professional development in the form of institutional teaching or learning center programming. This programming typically focuses on teaching and learning quality, transitions to online teaching, pedagogies, and new technologies. This article reports on the use of outsourced professional development along with faculty responses to the program. Use of an outsourced program was attractive to faculty who wanted to have another institution's name on their vita. Seventeen faculty completed the professional development program and eight shared their reflections on this inquiry. With a focus on translating research to practice, the article lays out a series of recommendations for future professional development for online instruction including attention to prior knowledge, personalizing approaches, targeting both introductory and advanced learner needs, integrating a community of practice with specific roles, reviewing all materials prior to implementation to ensure tailored program, allowing faculty choice across content, formative and summative evaluation to determine effectiveness including learner perceptions, learner analytics, and content review for current and emerging practice and innovation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current issues in emerging elearning\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current issues in emerging elearning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3532688.3529094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current issues in emerging elearning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3532688.3529094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了提高在线教学的质量,机构通常以机构教学或学习中心规划的形式提供结构化的专业发展。这种编程通常侧重于教学和学习质量,向在线教学、教学法和新技术的过渡。本文报告了外包专业发展的使用以及教师对该计划的反应。对于那些希望在简历上有另一个机构名字的教师来说,使用外包项目很有吸引力。17名教师完成了专业发展项目,8名教师分享了他们对这一调查的看法。着眼于将研究成果转化为实践,本文为在线教学的未来专业发展提出了一系列建议,包括关注先验知识,个性化方法,针对入门和高级学习者的需求,将实践社区与特定角色相结合,在实施之前审查所有材料以确保量身定制课程,允许教师选择不同的内容,形成性和总结性评估,以确定有效性,包括学习者感知,学习者分析,以及当前和新兴实践和创新的内容审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outsourced Professional Development for Online Instructors: Recommendations from research
To improve the quality of online teaching, institutions typically provide structured professional development in the form of institutional teaching or learning center programming. This programming typically focuses on teaching and learning quality, transitions to online teaching, pedagogies, and new technologies. This article reports on the use of outsourced professional development along with faculty responses to the program. Use of an outsourced program was attractive to faculty who wanted to have another institution's name on their vita. Seventeen faculty completed the professional development program and eight shared their reflections on this inquiry. With a focus on translating research to practice, the article lays out a series of recommendations for future professional development for online instruction including attention to prior knowledge, personalizing approaches, targeting both introductory and advanced learner needs, integrating a community of practice with specific roles, reviewing all materials prior to implementation to ensure tailored program, allowing faculty choice across content, formative and summative evaluation to determine effectiveness including learner perceptions, learner analytics, and content review for current and emerging practice and innovation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Five Priorities to Help Learners in the Online Classroom In Search of Continuous Improvement: An interview with Watermark's Brian Robinson Subject Matter Expert (SME) Onboarding 101: Improving development efficiency and course quality through SME training Four Strategies to Foster Effective Online Teaching within a Standardized Curriculum Using Gamification to Overcome Anxiety and Encourage Play in the Graduate Classroom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1