重新审视尼日利亚环境权利对话中的非可诉性问题

Q2 Social Sciences Environmental Law Review Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1177/14614529231168491
B. Umukoro
{"title":"重新审视尼日利亚环境权利对话中的非可诉性问题","authors":"B. Umukoro","doi":"10.1177/14614529231168491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The campaign for the recognition of environmental rights is progressively gaining momentum in Nigeria as the degradation of the environment continues without an effective legal framework for abatement. While environmental rights are yet to find general acceptability, legal scholars, environmentalists, non-governmental organisations and other stakeholders have continued to insist that it is possible to enforce environmental rights in Nigeria as though they were a fundamental right's claim. The article, in the face of the currency of environmental rights’ discourse in Nigeria and the recent UN Resolution recognising environmental rights as universal human rights, seeks to revisit the constitutional challenges associated with environmental rights’ claims in Nigeria, particularly, the non-justiciability slogan which has often been wielded as a sword of Damocles against arguments in favour of the right. The article observes that without necessarily constitutionalising environmental rights, a purposeful interpretation of Chapter IV of the Constitution could place Nigeria among countries with enforceable environmental rights in the world.","PeriodicalId":52213,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Law Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"101 - 119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting the non-justiciability issue in environmental rights dialogue in Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"B. Umukoro\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14614529231168491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The campaign for the recognition of environmental rights is progressively gaining momentum in Nigeria as the degradation of the environment continues without an effective legal framework for abatement. While environmental rights are yet to find general acceptability, legal scholars, environmentalists, non-governmental organisations and other stakeholders have continued to insist that it is possible to enforce environmental rights in Nigeria as though they were a fundamental right's claim. The article, in the face of the currency of environmental rights’ discourse in Nigeria and the recent UN Resolution recognising environmental rights as universal human rights, seeks to revisit the constitutional challenges associated with environmental rights’ claims in Nigeria, particularly, the non-justiciability slogan which has often been wielded as a sword of Damocles against arguments in favour of the right. The article observes that without necessarily constitutionalising environmental rights, a purposeful interpretation of Chapter IV of the Constitution could place Nigeria among countries with enforceable environmental rights in the world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Law Review\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"101 - 119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614529231168491\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614529231168491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在尼日利亚,由于环境继续退化而没有有效的法律框架来减少环境退化,争取承认环境权利的运动正在逐步获得动力。虽然环境权利尚未得到普遍接受,但法律学者、环保主义者、非政府组织和其他利益相关者继续坚持认为,在尼日利亚,执行环境权利是可能的,就好像它们是一项基本权利要求一样。这篇文章面对奈及利亚环境权利言论的流行,以及联合国最近承认环境权利为普世人权的决议,试图重新审视奈及利亚环境权利主张所面临的宪法挑战,特别是非可诉性的口号,常被当作达摩克利斯之剑,用来对抗支持该权利的论点。这篇文章指出,在没有必要将环境权利宪法化的情况下,对宪法第四章进行有目的的解释可以使尼日利亚成为世界上具有可执行环境权利的国家之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Revisiting the non-justiciability issue in environmental rights dialogue in Nigeria
The campaign for the recognition of environmental rights is progressively gaining momentum in Nigeria as the degradation of the environment continues without an effective legal framework for abatement. While environmental rights are yet to find general acceptability, legal scholars, environmentalists, non-governmental organisations and other stakeholders have continued to insist that it is possible to enforce environmental rights in Nigeria as though they were a fundamental right's claim. The article, in the face of the currency of environmental rights’ discourse in Nigeria and the recent UN Resolution recognising environmental rights as universal human rights, seeks to revisit the constitutional challenges associated with environmental rights’ claims in Nigeria, particularly, the non-justiciability slogan which has often been wielded as a sword of Damocles against arguments in favour of the right. The article observes that without necessarily constitutionalising environmental rights, a purposeful interpretation of Chapter IV of the Constitution could place Nigeria among countries with enforceable environmental rights in the world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Law Review
Environmental Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Book Review: The North Sea System for Petroleum Production, State Intervention on the British and Norwegian Continental Shelves by Brent F Nelsen and Tina Soliman Hunter Ecological constitutionalism within the Canadian context: Charter-ing international standards of the human right to a healthy environment From farm to fork? Brexit and the International Plant Protection Convention Transfer of ESTs in international law: A climate justice approach Biodiversity management challenges: A policy brief
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1