Morillo-Obrador多项式授权方案的密码分析

Shuaijianni Xu, L. Zhang
{"title":"Morillo-Obrador多项式授权方案的密码分析","authors":"Shuaijianni Xu, L. Zhang","doi":"10.1049/iet-ifs.2017.0259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Verifiable computation (VC) allows a client to outsource (delegate) the computation of a function f on an input x to a server and then verify the server's results with substantially less time than computing f(x) from scratch. The security of VC requires no efficient adversary can persuade the client to accept any wrong results. Morillo and Obrador (PST 2013) proposed three VC schemes for outsourcing the computation of polynomial functions and claimed that all schemes are secure under the decisional subgroup membership assumption. The authors show a simple attack against the security of their first scheme and then extend the attack to the other two schemes. Morillo and Obrador (PST 2013) also claimed that their third scheme keeps the client's input private under the square root assumption. The authors show that this is not true under the standard definition of input privacy. In particular, a curious server can extract the client's input x, if the x is not too large. The authors' results show that Morillo-Obrador schemes cannot be used in the polynomial delegation.","PeriodicalId":13305,"journal":{"name":"IET Inf. Secur.","volume":"48 1","pages":"127-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cryptanalysis of Morillo-Obrador polynomial delegation schemes\",\"authors\":\"Shuaijianni Xu, L. Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/iet-ifs.2017.0259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Verifiable computation (VC) allows a client to outsource (delegate) the computation of a function f on an input x to a server and then verify the server's results with substantially less time than computing f(x) from scratch. The security of VC requires no efficient adversary can persuade the client to accept any wrong results. Morillo and Obrador (PST 2013) proposed three VC schemes for outsourcing the computation of polynomial functions and claimed that all schemes are secure under the decisional subgroup membership assumption. The authors show a simple attack against the security of their first scheme and then extend the attack to the other two schemes. Morillo and Obrador (PST 2013) also claimed that their third scheme keeps the client's input private under the square root assumption. The authors show that this is not true under the standard definition of input privacy. In particular, a curious server can extract the client's input x, if the x is not too large. The authors' results show that Morillo-Obrador schemes cannot be used in the polynomial delegation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IET Inf. Secur.\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"127-132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IET Inf. Secur.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ifs.2017.0259\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Inf. Secur.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ifs.2017.0259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

可验证计算(VC)允许客户机将输入x上函数f的计算外包(委托)给服务器,然后用比从头计算f(x)少得多的时间验证服务器的结果。风险投资的安全性要求没有有效的对手可以说服客户接受任何错误的结果。Morillo和Obrador (PST 2013)提出了三种外包多项式函数计算的VC方案,并声称在决策子群隶属假设下,所有方案都是安全的。作者展示了针对第一个方案安全性的简单攻击,然后将攻击扩展到其他两个方案。Morillo和Obrador (PST 2013)还声称,他们的第三个方案在平方根假设下保持客户输入的私密性。作者表明,在输入隐私的标准定义下,这是不正确的。特别是,好奇的服务器可以提取客户机的输入x,如果x不是太大的话。结果表明,Morillo-Obrador方案不能用于多项式委托。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cryptanalysis of Morillo-Obrador polynomial delegation schemes
Verifiable computation (VC) allows a client to outsource (delegate) the computation of a function f on an input x to a server and then verify the server's results with substantially less time than computing f(x) from scratch. The security of VC requires no efficient adversary can persuade the client to accept any wrong results. Morillo and Obrador (PST 2013) proposed three VC schemes for outsourcing the computation of polynomial functions and claimed that all schemes are secure under the decisional subgroup membership assumption. The authors show a simple attack against the security of their first scheme and then extend the attack to the other two schemes. Morillo and Obrador (PST 2013) also claimed that their third scheme keeps the client's input private under the square root assumption. The authors show that this is not true under the standard definition of input privacy. In particular, a curious server can extract the client's input x, if the x is not too large. The authors' results show that Morillo-Obrador schemes cannot be used in the polynomial delegation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Revisit Two Memoryless State-Recovery Cryptanalysis Methods on A5/1 Improved Lattice-Based Mix-Nets for Electronic Voting Adaptive and survivable trust management for Internet of Things systems Comment on 'Targeted Ciphers for Format-Preserving Encryption' from Selected Areas in Cryptography 2018 Time-specific encrypted range query with minimum leakage disclosure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1