小儿先天性心脏病患者心律失常的机制和消融的结果。

C. Houck, Stephanie F. Chandler, A. Bogers, J. Triedman, E. Walsh, N. D. de Groot, D. Abrams
{"title":"小儿先天性心脏病患者心律失常的机制和消融的结果。","authors":"C. Houck, Stephanie F. Chandler, A. Bogers, J. Triedman, E. Walsh, N. D. de Groot, D. Abrams","doi":"10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nIn contrast to the adult population with congenital heart disease (CHD), arrhythmia mechanisms and outcomes of ablation in pediatric patients with CHD in recent era have not been studied in detail. Aims of this study were to determine arrhythmia mechanisms and to evaluate procedural and long-term outcomes in pediatric patients with CHD undergoing catheter ablation.\n\n\nMETHODS\nConsecutive patients <18 years of age with CHD undergoing catheter ablation over an 11-year period (2007-2018) were included. Procedural outcome included complete or partial success, failure or empirical ablation. Long-term outcome included arrhythmia recurrence and burden according to a 12-point clinical arrhythmia severity score.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe study population consisted of 232 patients (11.7 years [0.01-17.8], 33.5 kg [2.2-130.1]). The most common diagnoses were Ebstein's anomaly (n=44), septal defects (n=39), and single ventricle (n=36). Arrhythmia mechanisms included atrioventricular reentry tachycardia (n=104, 90 patients), atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (n=33, 29 patients), twin atrioventricular nodal tachycardia (n=3, 2 patients), macroreentrant atrial tachycardia (n=59, 56 patients), focal atrial tachycardia (n=33, 25 patients), ventricular ectopy (n=10, 8 patients), and ventricular tachycardia (n=15, 13 patients). Fifty-six arrhythmias (39 patients) were undefined. Outcomes included complete success (n=189, 81%), partial success (n=7, 3%), failure (n=16, 7%), or empirical ablation (n=20, 9%). Over 3.6 years (0.3-10.7) arrhythmia recurred in 49%. Independent of arrhythmia recurrence, arrhythmia scores decreased from 4 (0-10) at baseline to 0.5 (0-8) at 4 years follow-up (P<0.001). In 23/51 repeat procedures (45%), a different arrhythmia substrate was found. Overall adverse event rate was 9.4%, although only 1.6% (n=4) were of major severity and 0.8% (n=2) of moderate severity.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nPediatric patients with CHD demonstrate a broad spectrum of arrhythmia mechanisms. Despite recurrence and emergence of novel mechanisms after a successful procedure, ablation can be performed safely and successfully resulting in decreased arrhythmia burden.","PeriodicalId":10167,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arrhythmia Mechanisms and Outcomes of Ablation in Pediatric Patients With Congenital Heart Disease.\",\"authors\":\"C. Houck, Stephanie F. Chandler, A. Bogers, J. Triedman, E. Walsh, N. D. de Groot, D. Abrams\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nIn contrast to the adult population with congenital heart disease (CHD), arrhythmia mechanisms and outcomes of ablation in pediatric patients with CHD in recent era have not been studied in detail. Aims of this study were to determine arrhythmia mechanisms and to evaluate procedural and long-term outcomes in pediatric patients with CHD undergoing catheter ablation.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nConsecutive patients <18 years of age with CHD undergoing catheter ablation over an 11-year period (2007-2018) were included. Procedural outcome included complete or partial success, failure or empirical ablation. Long-term outcome included arrhythmia recurrence and burden according to a 12-point clinical arrhythmia severity score.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThe study population consisted of 232 patients (11.7 years [0.01-17.8], 33.5 kg [2.2-130.1]). The most common diagnoses were Ebstein's anomaly (n=44), septal defects (n=39), and single ventricle (n=36). Arrhythmia mechanisms included atrioventricular reentry tachycardia (n=104, 90 patients), atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (n=33, 29 patients), twin atrioventricular nodal tachycardia (n=3, 2 patients), macroreentrant atrial tachycardia (n=59, 56 patients), focal atrial tachycardia (n=33, 25 patients), ventricular ectopy (n=10, 8 patients), and ventricular tachycardia (n=15, 13 patients). Fifty-six arrhythmias (39 patients) were undefined. Outcomes included complete success (n=189, 81%), partial success (n=7, 3%), failure (n=16, 7%), or empirical ablation (n=20, 9%). Over 3.6 years (0.3-10.7) arrhythmia recurred in 49%. Independent of arrhythmia recurrence, arrhythmia scores decreased from 4 (0-10) at baseline to 0.5 (0-8) at 4 years follow-up (P<0.001). In 23/51 repeat procedures (45%), a different arrhythmia substrate was found. Overall adverse event rate was 9.4%, although only 1.6% (n=4) were of major severity and 0.8% (n=2) of moderate severity.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nPediatric patients with CHD demonstrate a broad spectrum of arrhythmia mechanisms. Despite recurrence and emergence of novel mechanisms after a successful procedure, ablation can be performed safely and successfully resulting in decreased arrhythmia burden.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007663\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

与成人先天性心脏病(CHD)患者相比,近年来儿科CHD患者的心律失常机制和消融结果尚未得到详细研究。本研究的目的是确定心律失常的机制,并评估儿科冠心病患者导管消融的手术和长期预后。方法纳入了连续11年(2007-2018年)接受导管消融治疗的<18岁冠心病患者。手术结果包括完全或部分成功、失败或经验消融。长期预后包括心律失常复发和根据12分临床心律失常严重程度评分的负担。结果232例患者(年龄11.7岁[0.01 ~ 17.8],体重33.5公斤[2.2 ~ 130.1])。最常见的诊断是Ebstein异常(n=44)、间隔缺损(n=39)和单心室(n=36)。心律失常机制包括房室再入性心动过速(n=104, 90例)、房室结性再入性心动过速(n=33, 29例)、双房室结性心动过速(n=3, 2例)、大房室再入性心动过速(n=59, 56例)、局灶性心动过速(n=33, 25例)、室性心动过速(n=10, 8例)、室性心动过速(n=15, 13例)。56例心律失常(39例)未明确。结果包括完全成功(n=189, 81%)、部分成功(n=7, 3%)、失败(n=16, 7%)或经验消融(n= 20,9%)。超过3.6年(0.3-10.7)心律失常复发占49%。与心律失常复发无关,心律失常评分从基线时的4分(0-10分)降至4年随访时的0.5分(0-8分)(P<0.001)。在23/51次重复手术中(45%),发现心律失常底物不同。总体不良事件发生率为9.4%,其中重度不良事件发生率为1.6% (n=4),中度不良事件发生率为0.8% (n=2)。结论儿科冠心病患者心律失常机制具有广谱性。尽管手术成功后会复发和出现新的机制,但消融可以安全成功地进行,从而减少心律失常负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Arrhythmia Mechanisms and Outcomes of Ablation in Pediatric Patients With Congenital Heart Disease.
BACKGROUND In contrast to the adult population with congenital heart disease (CHD), arrhythmia mechanisms and outcomes of ablation in pediatric patients with CHD in recent era have not been studied in detail. Aims of this study were to determine arrhythmia mechanisms and to evaluate procedural and long-term outcomes in pediatric patients with CHD undergoing catheter ablation. METHODS Consecutive patients <18 years of age with CHD undergoing catheter ablation over an 11-year period (2007-2018) were included. Procedural outcome included complete or partial success, failure or empirical ablation. Long-term outcome included arrhythmia recurrence and burden according to a 12-point clinical arrhythmia severity score. RESULTS The study population consisted of 232 patients (11.7 years [0.01-17.8], 33.5 kg [2.2-130.1]). The most common diagnoses were Ebstein's anomaly (n=44), septal defects (n=39), and single ventricle (n=36). Arrhythmia mechanisms included atrioventricular reentry tachycardia (n=104, 90 patients), atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (n=33, 29 patients), twin atrioventricular nodal tachycardia (n=3, 2 patients), macroreentrant atrial tachycardia (n=59, 56 patients), focal atrial tachycardia (n=33, 25 patients), ventricular ectopy (n=10, 8 patients), and ventricular tachycardia (n=15, 13 patients). Fifty-six arrhythmias (39 patients) were undefined. Outcomes included complete success (n=189, 81%), partial success (n=7, 3%), failure (n=16, 7%), or empirical ablation (n=20, 9%). Over 3.6 years (0.3-10.7) arrhythmia recurred in 49%. Independent of arrhythmia recurrence, arrhythmia scores decreased from 4 (0-10) at baseline to 0.5 (0-8) at 4 years follow-up (P<0.001). In 23/51 repeat procedures (45%), a different arrhythmia substrate was found. Overall adverse event rate was 9.4%, although only 1.6% (n=4) were of major severity and 0.8% (n=2) of moderate severity. CONCLUSIONS Pediatric patients with CHD demonstrate a broad spectrum of arrhythmia mechanisms. Despite recurrence and emergence of novel mechanisms after a successful procedure, ablation can be performed safely and successfully resulting in decreased arrhythmia burden.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Coronary Sinus Metabolite 12,13-diHOME Is a Novel Biomarker for Left Atrial Remodeling in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Impact of Contact Force on Pulsed Field Ablation Outcomes Using Focal Point Catheter Characteristics of Right-Sided Accessory Pathways Associated With Right Cardiac Veins Prognostic Impact of Sinus Rhythm in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: Separating Rhythm Outcomes From Randomized Strategy Findings From the CABANA Trial Trends Favoring an Anatomical Approach to Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias Originating From the Left Ventricular Summit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1