室内拉格朗日粒子建模:RANS和LES湍流方法的比较(RP-1512)

Shichao Liu, A. Novoselac
{"title":"室内拉格朗日粒子建模:RANS和LES湍流方法的比较(RP-1512)","authors":"Shichao Liu, A. Novoselac","doi":"10.1080/10789669.2014.884380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indoor particulate contaminants can be generated in many ways, commonly from human activities, infiltration of HVAC systems, or resuspension from indoor surfaces. Most of these sources are transient and generate nonuniform particle distribution in the space. This study used experimental and numerical methods to investigate the dispersion of three different particle sizes (0.7, 2.5, and 7 μm) emitted from typical source positions. A test room and simplified thermal manikins were employed to mimic a realistic indoor environment, and experimental data were compared with particle modeling using the Lagrangian method coupled with Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and large eddy simulation (LES) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) turbulence models. Particle dispersion was studied for two ventilation patterns: buoyancy-driven ventilation and well-mixed ventilation. The results provided a comparison of Lagrangian-RANS particle modeling, Lagrangian-LES particle modeling, and experimental data considering nonuniform temporal and spatial particle concentrations. Experimental and modeling results were evaluated with three different metrics: peak normalized concentration at various locations, peak-concentration occurrence time, and mean exposure defined as the averaged concentration in the occupant's breathing zone. The results show that Lagrangian-LES more accurately predicts concentration fluctuation during particle emission. Considering long-term exposure, however, both methods show similar results.","PeriodicalId":13238,"journal":{"name":"HVAC&R Research","volume":"5 1","pages":"480 - 495"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lagrangian particle modeling in the indoor environment: A comparison of RANS and LES turbulence methods (RP-1512)\",\"authors\":\"Shichao Liu, A. Novoselac\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10789669.2014.884380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Indoor particulate contaminants can be generated in many ways, commonly from human activities, infiltration of HVAC systems, or resuspension from indoor surfaces. Most of these sources are transient and generate nonuniform particle distribution in the space. This study used experimental and numerical methods to investigate the dispersion of three different particle sizes (0.7, 2.5, and 7 μm) emitted from typical source positions. A test room and simplified thermal manikins were employed to mimic a realistic indoor environment, and experimental data were compared with particle modeling using the Lagrangian method coupled with Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and large eddy simulation (LES) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) turbulence models. Particle dispersion was studied for two ventilation patterns: buoyancy-driven ventilation and well-mixed ventilation. The results provided a comparison of Lagrangian-RANS particle modeling, Lagrangian-LES particle modeling, and experimental data considering nonuniform temporal and spatial particle concentrations. Experimental and modeling results were evaluated with three different metrics: peak normalized concentration at various locations, peak-concentration occurrence time, and mean exposure defined as the averaged concentration in the occupant's breathing zone. The results show that Lagrangian-LES more accurately predicts concentration fluctuation during particle emission. Considering long-term exposure, however, both methods show similar results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HVAC&R Research\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"480 - 495\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HVAC&R Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10789669.2014.884380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HVAC&R Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10789669.2014.884380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

室内颗粒污染物可以通过多种方式产生,通常来自人类活动、HVAC系统的渗透或室内表面的再悬浮。这些源大多是瞬态的,在空间上产生不均匀的粒子分布。本研究采用实验和数值方法研究了三种不同粒径(0.7 μm、2.5 μm和7 μm)从典型源位置发射的散射。采用实验室内和简化的热人体模型模拟真实的室内环境,并将实验数据与拉格朗日方法结合Reynolds平均Navier-Stokes (RANS)和大涡模拟(LES)计算流体动力学(CFD)湍流模型的颗粒模型进行了比较。研究了两种通风方式:浮力驱动通风和均匀混合通风。结果提供了拉格朗日- rans粒子模型、拉格朗日- les粒子模型和考虑非均匀时空粒子浓度的实验数据的比较。实验和建模结果用三个不同的指标进行评估:不同地点的峰值标准化浓度、峰值浓度发生时间和平均暴露量(即乘员呼吸区的平均浓度)。结果表明,拉格朗日- les能较准确地预测粒子发射过程中的浓度波动。然而,考虑到长期暴露,两种方法显示出相似的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lagrangian particle modeling in the indoor environment: A comparison of RANS and LES turbulence methods (RP-1512)
Indoor particulate contaminants can be generated in many ways, commonly from human activities, infiltration of HVAC systems, or resuspension from indoor surfaces. Most of these sources are transient and generate nonuniform particle distribution in the space. This study used experimental and numerical methods to investigate the dispersion of three different particle sizes (0.7, 2.5, and 7 μm) emitted from typical source positions. A test room and simplified thermal manikins were employed to mimic a realistic indoor environment, and experimental data were compared with particle modeling using the Lagrangian method coupled with Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and large eddy simulation (LES) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) turbulence models. Particle dispersion was studied for two ventilation patterns: buoyancy-driven ventilation and well-mixed ventilation. The results provided a comparison of Lagrangian-RANS particle modeling, Lagrangian-LES particle modeling, and experimental data considering nonuniform temporal and spatial particle concentrations. Experimental and modeling results were evaluated with three different metrics: peak normalized concentration at various locations, peak-concentration occurrence time, and mean exposure defined as the averaged concentration in the occupant's breathing zone. The results show that Lagrangian-LES more accurately predicts concentration fluctuation during particle emission. Considering long-term exposure, however, both methods show similar results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HVAC&R Research
HVAC&R Research 工程技术-工程:机械
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊最新文献
EOV Editorial Board The never-ending search Accelerating fast fluid dynamics with a coarse-grid projection scheme Numerical modeling of volatile organic compound emissions from ozone reactions with human-worn clothing in an aircraft cabin Dynamic simulation and analysis of ancillary service demand response strategies for variable air volume HVAC systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1