F. Tirelli, Paolo Mirco, P. Fransvea, G. Pepe, A. Tringali, M. D. Grezia, C. Lodoli, V. Cozza, A. Greca, G. Sganga
{"title":"胆道支架穿孔:病例报告与回顾","authors":"F. Tirelli, Paolo Mirco, P. Fransvea, G. Pepe, A. Tringali, M. D. Grezia, C. Lodoli, V. Cozza, A. Greca, G. Sganga","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1733777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopacreatography (ERCP) has a pivotal role for the management of various malignant and benign pancreatico-biliary disorders. Biliary stents migration is reported in 5 to 10% of the cases and can be responsible for bowel perforation. An 80-year-old Caucasian man was referred to our hospital for an attempt at endoscopic extraction of massive intrahepatic lithiasis; during ERCP, complete stone extraction in a single session was not achievable and three plastic biliary stents were inserted to promote stone size reduction and perform a delayed cholangioscopy-assisted lithotripsy. During the next 2 days, the patient developed worsening abdominal pain with no fever, nausea, and vomiting. An emergency computed tomography showed a duodenal perforation due to biliary stent migration. Upon laparotomy, a direct suture of the duodenal lesion was performed. The patient died 3 days later because of a multiorgan failure. ERCP-related complications may occur in 5 to 15% of the cases and biliary stent migration accounts for 5 to 10% of these cases; less than 1% of stents migration determines bowel perforation, most commonly in the duodenum. Stent-related bowel perforation can be clinically misleading and early diagnosis and treatment are sometimes challenging. Whether the duodenal perforation is intra- or retroperitoneal should be taken into account to choose the best therapeutic approach.","PeriodicalId":91014,"journal":{"name":"Digestive disease interventions","volume":"82 1","pages":"324 - 330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perforation Due to Biliary Stent: Case Report and Review\",\"authors\":\"F. Tirelli, Paolo Mirco, P. Fransvea, G. Pepe, A. Tringali, M. D. Grezia, C. Lodoli, V. Cozza, A. Greca, G. Sganga\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0041-1733777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopacreatography (ERCP) has a pivotal role for the management of various malignant and benign pancreatico-biliary disorders. Biliary stents migration is reported in 5 to 10% of the cases and can be responsible for bowel perforation. An 80-year-old Caucasian man was referred to our hospital for an attempt at endoscopic extraction of massive intrahepatic lithiasis; during ERCP, complete stone extraction in a single session was not achievable and three plastic biliary stents were inserted to promote stone size reduction and perform a delayed cholangioscopy-assisted lithotripsy. During the next 2 days, the patient developed worsening abdominal pain with no fever, nausea, and vomiting. An emergency computed tomography showed a duodenal perforation due to biliary stent migration. Upon laparotomy, a direct suture of the duodenal lesion was performed. The patient died 3 days later because of a multiorgan failure. ERCP-related complications may occur in 5 to 15% of the cases and biliary stent migration accounts for 5 to 10% of these cases; less than 1% of stents migration determines bowel perforation, most commonly in the duodenum. Stent-related bowel perforation can be clinically misleading and early diagnosis and treatment are sometimes challenging. Whether the duodenal perforation is intra- or retroperitoneal should be taken into account to choose the best therapeutic approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive disease interventions\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"324 - 330\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive disease interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1733777\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive disease interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1733777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Perforation Due to Biliary Stent: Case Report and Review
Abstract Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopacreatography (ERCP) has a pivotal role for the management of various malignant and benign pancreatico-biliary disorders. Biliary stents migration is reported in 5 to 10% of the cases and can be responsible for bowel perforation. An 80-year-old Caucasian man was referred to our hospital for an attempt at endoscopic extraction of massive intrahepatic lithiasis; during ERCP, complete stone extraction in a single session was not achievable and three plastic biliary stents were inserted to promote stone size reduction and perform a delayed cholangioscopy-assisted lithotripsy. During the next 2 days, the patient developed worsening abdominal pain with no fever, nausea, and vomiting. An emergency computed tomography showed a duodenal perforation due to biliary stent migration. Upon laparotomy, a direct suture of the duodenal lesion was performed. The patient died 3 days later because of a multiorgan failure. ERCP-related complications may occur in 5 to 15% of the cases and biliary stent migration accounts for 5 to 10% of these cases; less than 1% of stents migration determines bowel perforation, most commonly in the duodenum. Stent-related bowel perforation can be clinically misleading and early diagnosis and treatment are sometimes challenging. Whether the duodenal perforation is intra- or retroperitoneal should be taken into account to choose the best therapeutic approach.