道德价值形而上学与道德美

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Quaestiones Disputatae Pub Date : 2016-10-01 DOI:10.1353/QUD.2016.0003
M. Otte
{"title":"道德价值形而上学与道德美","authors":"M. Otte","doi":"10.1353/QUD.2016.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"to make little sense. Von Hildebrandian values contrast in fundamental ways with Scholastic theories of the good and beautiful. For von Hildebrand, beauty and good are not transcendentals that are coextensive with being. Rather, being is rendered beautiful or good by values: properties that remain distinct from “neutral” being as such.1 Nevertheless, there is ground for substantial movement towards synthesizing these traditions. Von Hildebrand’s description of values bears strong resemblance with a centerpiece of Scholastic phi-","PeriodicalId":40384,"journal":{"name":"Quaestiones Disputatae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Metaphysics of Moral Values and Moral Beauty\",\"authors\":\"M. Otte\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/QUD.2016.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"to make little sense. Von Hildebrandian values contrast in fundamental ways with Scholastic theories of the good and beautiful. For von Hildebrand, beauty and good are not transcendentals that are coextensive with being. Rather, being is rendered beautiful or good by values: properties that remain distinct from “neutral” being as such.1 Nevertheless, there is ground for substantial movement towards synthesizing these traditions. Von Hildebrand’s description of values bears strong resemblance with a centerpiece of Scholastic phi-\",\"PeriodicalId\":40384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quaestiones Disputatae\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quaestiones Disputatae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/QUD.2016.0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaestiones Disputatae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/QUD.2016.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

毫无意义。希尔德布兰的价值观与经院的善与美的理论有着根本的对比。对冯·希尔德布兰德来说,美与善并不是与存在共延的先验。更确切地说,存在是由价值来呈现的美或善:这些属性与“中性”存在本身是不同的然而,有理由在综合这些传统方面采取实质性行动。冯·希尔德布兰德对价值观的描述与经院哲学的核心内容有很大的相似之处
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Metaphysics of Moral Values and Moral Beauty
to make little sense. Von Hildebrandian values contrast in fundamental ways with Scholastic theories of the good and beautiful. For von Hildebrand, beauty and good are not transcendentals that are coextensive with being. Rather, being is rendered beautiful or good by values: properties that remain distinct from “neutral” being as such.1 Nevertheless, there is ground for substantial movement towards synthesizing these traditions. Von Hildebrand’s description of values bears strong resemblance with a centerpiece of Scholastic phi-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quaestiones Disputatae
Quaestiones Disputatae HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Remnants of Substances: A Neo-Aristotelian Resolution of the Puzzles After Survivalism and Corruptionism: Separated Souls as Incomplete Persons Evaluating Hylomorphism as a Hybrid Account of Personal Identity Editor’s Introduction Saint Thomas Aquinas and the Too-Many-Thinkers Problem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1