malihe ghiasvand, F. Nahidi, S. S. Mobarakabadi, Nasrin Broumandnia, H. Sharifnia
{"title":"会阴切开术在中东地区的流行和荟萃分析","authors":"malihe ghiasvand, F. Nahidi, S. S. Mobarakabadi, Nasrin Broumandnia, H. Sharifnia","doi":"10.22038/IJOGI.2021.18439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Routine use of episiotomy is not recommended for women giving birth naturally. However, several studies in the Middle East have reported that it has high prevalence, but there is no general estimate. This study was performed with aim to review the prevalence and met-analysis of episiotomy in the Middle East based on studies conducted in this field. \nMethods: To search for articles, the databases of SID, Magiran, Medline, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, ProQuest and google scholer search engines using the keywords of prevalence, epidemiology, frequency, incidence, rate and episiotomy in both languages of Persian and English and all possible combinations were searched with AND and OR operators. Calculation of heterogeneity of the studies was evaluated using I2 index and Bag test was used to examine the bias. \nResults: Twelve articles with a sample size of 69171 were reviewed. The overall prevalence of episiotomy was 67% (95% CI: 55-78). Using the random effect model, the risk of episiotomy in primiparous women was two times than multiparous women, which was statistically significant (RR = 2.01, 95% CI: 0.87-4.63, p <0.001; I2 = 99.99). Oxytocin use was also associated with an 80% (60-95%) prevalence of episiotomy. \nConclusion: Due to the high rate of episiotomy in the Middle East, despite the standard set by the World Health Organization, there is an urgent need for planning to reduce this rate. Therefore, it is recommended to use effective methods to reduce the need for episiotomy in primiparous women and to avoid unnecessary clinical interventions such as using oxytocin.","PeriodicalId":39154,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility","volume":"67 1","pages":"90-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and meta-analysis of episiotomy in the Middle East\",\"authors\":\"malihe ghiasvand, F. Nahidi, S. S. Mobarakabadi, Nasrin Broumandnia, H. Sharifnia\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/IJOGI.2021.18439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Routine use of episiotomy is not recommended for women giving birth naturally. However, several studies in the Middle East have reported that it has high prevalence, but there is no general estimate. This study was performed with aim to review the prevalence and met-analysis of episiotomy in the Middle East based on studies conducted in this field. \\nMethods: To search for articles, the databases of SID, Magiran, Medline, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, ProQuest and google scholer search engines using the keywords of prevalence, epidemiology, frequency, incidence, rate and episiotomy in both languages of Persian and English and all possible combinations were searched with AND and OR operators. Calculation of heterogeneity of the studies was evaluated using I2 index and Bag test was used to examine the bias. \\nResults: Twelve articles with a sample size of 69171 were reviewed. The overall prevalence of episiotomy was 67% (95% CI: 55-78). Using the random effect model, the risk of episiotomy in primiparous women was two times than multiparous women, which was statistically significant (RR = 2.01, 95% CI: 0.87-4.63, p <0.001; I2 = 99.99). Oxytocin use was also associated with an 80% (60-95%) prevalence of episiotomy. \\nConclusion: Due to the high rate of episiotomy in the Middle East, despite the standard set by the World Health Organization, there is an urgent need for planning to reduce this rate. Therefore, it is recommended to use effective methods to reduce the need for episiotomy in primiparous women and to avoid unnecessary clinical interventions such as using oxytocin.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"90-99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJOGI.2021.18439\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJOGI.2021.18439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
简介:常规使用会阴切开术不建议妇女自然分娩。然而,中东的几项研究报告说,它的患病率很高,但没有一般的估计。本研究的目的是回顾会阴切开术在中东地区的流行情况,并根据该领域的研究进行meta分析。方法:采用波斯语和英语检索SID、Magiran、Medline、Science Direct、Scopus、Web of Science、Embase、ProQuest和google scholar搜索引擎数据库中流行病学、流行病学、频率、发病率、发生率和会外切等关键词,并使用and和OR运算符搜索所有可能的组合。采用I2指数评估研究的异质性计算,采用Bag检验检验偏倚。结果:共纳入12篇文献,样本量69171篇。外阴切开术的总患病率为67% (95% CI: 55-78)。采用随机效应模型,初产妇女发生会阴切开术的风险是多产妇女的2倍,差异有统计学意义(RR = 2.01, 95% CI: 0.87-4.63, p <0.001;I2 = 99.99)。催产素的使用也与80%(60-95%)的会阴切开术发生率相关。结论:尽管世界卫生组织制定了标准,但由于中东地区的外阴切开术率很高,迫切需要制定计划来降低这一比率。因此,建议采用有效的方法减少初产妇会阴切开术的必要性,避免使用催产素等不必要的临床干预。
Prevalence and meta-analysis of episiotomy in the Middle East
Introduction: Routine use of episiotomy is not recommended for women giving birth naturally. However, several studies in the Middle East have reported that it has high prevalence, but there is no general estimate. This study was performed with aim to review the prevalence and met-analysis of episiotomy in the Middle East based on studies conducted in this field.
Methods: To search for articles, the databases of SID, Magiran, Medline, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, ProQuest and google scholer search engines using the keywords of prevalence, epidemiology, frequency, incidence, rate and episiotomy in both languages of Persian and English and all possible combinations were searched with AND and OR operators. Calculation of heterogeneity of the studies was evaluated using I2 index and Bag test was used to examine the bias.
Results: Twelve articles with a sample size of 69171 were reviewed. The overall prevalence of episiotomy was 67% (95% CI: 55-78). Using the random effect model, the risk of episiotomy in primiparous women was two times than multiparous women, which was statistically significant (RR = 2.01, 95% CI: 0.87-4.63, p <0.001; I2 = 99.99). Oxytocin use was also associated with an 80% (60-95%) prevalence of episiotomy.
Conclusion: Due to the high rate of episiotomy in the Middle East, despite the standard set by the World Health Organization, there is an urgent need for planning to reduce this rate. Therefore, it is recommended to use effective methods to reduce the need for episiotomy in primiparous women and to avoid unnecessary clinical interventions such as using oxytocin.