在印度,避孕环作为一种避孕方法的评价

D. Patel, D. Vyas, SapanaShah, Dr.Purvi Parikh
{"title":"在印度,避孕环作为一种避孕方法的评价","authors":"D. Patel, D. Vyas, SapanaShah, Dr.Purvi Parikh","doi":"10.9790/0853-1606144953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To evaluate and compare safety and efficacy of PPIUCD in two groups of patients: vaginal insertion group after normal delivery and intra cesarean insertion group. Methods: A prospective study carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at a tertiary care center. After counseling with patients and her relatives during antepartum period, IUCD insertion was done in 1438 patients. In 417 patients IUCD was inserted vaginally. In 1021 patients IUCD was inserted while cesarean section. All these patients were followed up after 6 weeks and after 6 months interval regularly. All the complications were recorded and studied. Incidence, clinical outcome & missing threads were analyzed. Results: Both the methods of PPIUCD insertion were safe and efficacious. Out of 1438 women ,1340 cases had follow up as per the protocol. Fifty eight cases who lost for follow up and 40 cases who had spontaneous expulsion, were excluded from study. There were missing strings in 363 cases at 6 weeks examination and in 338 cases at 6 months follow up examination. Ultrasonography of pelvis establishes IUCD location in uterine cavity. Neither perforation nor pregnancy with PPIUCD was found in present study. They have low rates of abdominal pain, pelvic infection, heavy menstruation and lost strings. Conclusion: PPIUCD is an appealing approach and may become a choice of post-partumcontraception. It is safe and effective method of reversible contraception.Missing strings after PPIUCD insertion is a common problem encountered during follow up examination. Every user must be followed up and provider must take better aftercare in forms of follow up and management of complication if needed.","PeriodicalId":14489,"journal":{"name":"IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"49-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Ppiucd Insertion as a Method of Contraception in India\",\"authors\":\"D. Patel, D. Vyas, SapanaShah, Dr.Purvi Parikh\",\"doi\":\"10.9790/0853-1606144953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To evaluate and compare safety and efficacy of PPIUCD in two groups of patients: vaginal insertion group after normal delivery and intra cesarean insertion group. Methods: A prospective study carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at a tertiary care center. After counseling with patients and her relatives during antepartum period, IUCD insertion was done in 1438 patients. In 417 patients IUCD was inserted vaginally. In 1021 patients IUCD was inserted while cesarean section. All these patients were followed up after 6 weeks and after 6 months interval regularly. All the complications were recorded and studied. Incidence, clinical outcome & missing threads were analyzed. Results: Both the methods of PPIUCD insertion were safe and efficacious. Out of 1438 women ,1340 cases had follow up as per the protocol. Fifty eight cases who lost for follow up and 40 cases who had spontaneous expulsion, were excluded from study. There were missing strings in 363 cases at 6 weeks examination and in 338 cases at 6 months follow up examination. Ultrasonography of pelvis establishes IUCD location in uterine cavity. Neither perforation nor pregnancy with PPIUCD was found in present study. They have low rates of abdominal pain, pelvic infection, heavy menstruation and lost strings. Conclusion: PPIUCD is an appealing approach and may become a choice of post-partumcontraception. It is safe and effective method of reversible contraception.Missing strings after PPIUCD insertion is a common problem encountered during follow up examination. Every user must be followed up and provider must take better aftercare in forms of follow up and management of complication if needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"49-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-1606144953\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-1606144953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:评价和比较正常分娩后阴道插入组和剖宫产内插入组PPIUCD的安全性和有效性。方法:在某三级保健中心的妇产科进行前瞻性研究。1438例患者经产前咨询患者及家属后,行宫内节育器植入术。417例患者宫内节育器经阴道置入。1021例患者在剖宫产术中置入宫内节育器。所有患者每隔6周和6个月定期随访。对所有并发症进行记录和研究。分析发生率、临床结果及缺失线。结果:两种方法均安全有效。在1438名妇女中,1340例按照协议进行了随访。58例失踪者和40例自发性排尿者被排除在研究之外。随访6个月338例,随访6周363例。盆腔超声检查确定宫内节育器位置。本研究未发现PPIUCD穿孔或妊娠。他们的腹痛、盆腔感染、月经量大和尿道丢失的几率很低。结论:PPIUCD是一种有吸引力的方法,可能成为产后避孕的选择。是一种安全有效的可逆避孕方法。PPIUCD插入后漏串是随访检查中常见的问题。每个用户都必须接受随访,如果需要,提供者必须采取更好的随访和并发症管理形式的善后护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Ppiucd Insertion as a Method of Contraception in India
Aim: To evaluate and compare safety and efficacy of PPIUCD in two groups of patients: vaginal insertion group after normal delivery and intra cesarean insertion group. Methods: A prospective study carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at a tertiary care center. After counseling with patients and her relatives during antepartum period, IUCD insertion was done in 1438 patients. In 417 patients IUCD was inserted vaginally. In 1021 patients IUCD was inserted while cesarean section. All these patients were followed up after 6 weeks and after 6 months interval regularly. All the complications were recorded and studied. Incidence, clinical outcome & missing threads were analyzed. Results: Both the methods of PPIUCD insertion were safe and efficacious. Out of 1438 women ,1340 cases had follow up as per the protocol. Fifty eight cases who lost for follow up and 40 cases who had spontaneous expulsion, were excluded from study. There were missing strings in 363 cases at 6 weeks examination and in 338 cases at 6 months follow up examination. Ultrasonography of pelvis establishes IUCD location in uterine cavity. Neither perforation nor pregnancy with PPIUCD was found in present study. They have low rates of abdominal pain, pelvic infection, heavy menstruation and lost strings. Conclusion: PPIUCD is an appealing approach and may become a choice of post-partumcontraception. It is safe and effective method of reversible contraception.Missing strings after PPIUCD insertion is a common problem encountered during follow up examination. Every user must be followed up and provider must take better aftercare in forms of follow up and management of complication if needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Persistent Enlarged Thymus in an Adult Human Cadaver Choledocholithiasis And Acute Cholangitis Following PostCholecystectomy Clip Migration Paraduodenal Hernia: A Rare Case Report A Study on Hematological Abnormalities in Chronic Liver Diseases Screening of Risk Factors of Hypertension among Urban and Rural Populations of District-Hapur
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1