非均衡模型:对中国大学内部治理的一种解释

Q3 Social Sciences Chinese Education and Society Pub Date : 2020-07-03 DOI:10.1080/10611932.2020.1823804
Ling-xiang Jian
{"title":"非均衡模型:对中国大学内部治理的一种解释","authors":"Ling-xiang Jian","doi":"10.1080/10611932.2020.1823804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The form of internal university governance is often based on the phenomena of institutional isomorphism within examinations of legitimacy. Under the background of the “CPC leadership + unbalanced governance” state governance model, Chinese universities need to break away from the preconceived notions of balanced governance in their internal governance. From a generative logic perspective, the basic institutional framework of the internal governance of Chinese universities and its changes and improvements are determined by mandatory government interference, and this also leads to the unbalanced characteristics of three “strong-weak” relationships in the internal governance of Chinese universities. Outside the formal institutional system, balancing mechanisms such as internal supervisory restrictions, internal division of labor consultations, and public opinion restrictions act as effective supplements to the unbalanced internal governance of Chinese universities.","PeriodicalId":39911,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Education and Society","volume":"59 1","pages":"187 - 197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unbalanced Model: An Interpretation of the Internal Governance of Chinese Universities\",\"authors\":\"Ling-xiang Jian\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10611932.2020.1823804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The form of internal university governance is often based on the phenomena of institutional isomorphism within examinations of legitimacy. Under the background of the “CPC leadership + unbalanced governance” state governance model, Chinese universities need to break away from the preconceived notions of balanced governance in their internal governance. From a generative logic perspective, the basic institutional framework of the internal governance of Chinese universities and its changes and improvements are determined by mandatory government interference, and this also leads to the unbalanced characteristics of three “strong-weak” relationships in the internal governance of Chinese universities. Outside the formal institutional system, balancing mechanisms such as internal supervisory restrictions, internal division of labor consultations, and public opinion restrictions act as effective supplements to the unbalanced internal governance of Chinese universities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Education and Society\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"187 - 197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Education and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611932.2020.1823804\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Education and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611932.2020.1823804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要大学内部治理的形式往往基于合法性审查中的制度同构现象。在“党领导+非均衡治理”的国家治理模式背景下,中国高校在内部治理中需要打破平衡治理的先入为主观念。从生成逻辑的角度看,中国大学内部治理的基本制度框架及其变迁与完善是由强制性政府干预所决定的,这也导致了中国大学内部治理呈现出三种“强-弱”关系的不平衡特征。在正式制度体系之外,内部监督约束、内部分工协商、舆论约束等制衡机制是对中国大学内部治理失衡的有效补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unbalanced Model: An Interpretation of the Internal Governance of Chinese Universities
Abstract The form of internal university governance is often based on the phenomena of institutional isomorphism within examinations of legitimacy. Under the background of the “CPC leadership + unbalanced governance” state governance model, Chinese universities need to break away from the preconceived notions of balanced governance in their internal governance. From a generative logic perspective, the basic institutional framework of the internal governance of Chinese universities and its changes and improvements are determined by mandatory government interference, and this also leads to the unbalanced characteristics of three “strong-weak” relationships in the internal governance of Chinese universities. Outside the formal institutional system, balancing mechanisms such as internal supervisory restrictions, internal division of labor consultations, and public opinion restrictions act as effective supplements to the unbalanced internal governance of Chinese universities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chinese Education and Society
Chinese Education and Society Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: How is China"s vast population being educated in the home, the school, and the workplace? Chinese Education and Society is essential for insight into the latest Chinese thinking on educational policy and practice, educational reform and development, pedagogical theory and methods, colleges and universities, schools and families, as well as the education for diverse social groups across gender and youth, urban and rural, mainstream and minorities. It features unabridged translations of the most important articles in the field from Chinese sources, including scholarly journals and collections of articles published in book form. It also provides refereed research on specific themes.
期刊最新文献
Chinese Citizen or Global Citizen? Nationalism and Cosmopolitanism at an International School in Beijing Family and Education across Social Contexts in China Parental Investment on a Socioeconomic Basis: A Comparative Study of Southeast China and Taiwan The Mediating Effects of Peer Relationship and Self-Esteem on the Relations Between Subjective Socioeconomic Status and Subjective Well-Being for High School Students The Absent Family and the Education among Contemporary Tibetan Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1