Francis Jonbäck
{"title":"Hopeism","authors":"Francis Jonbäck","doi":"10.1080/0039338X.2021.1954084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Philosophers of religion have traditionally focused their attention on belief in God and assessed such belief in terms of it having some epistemic status like “rationality” or “probability”, or indeed by determining whether or not it constitutes knowledge. In this paper, I focus my attention on the non-doxastic attitude of hope and formulate reasons for whether or not we should hope for God. In light of these reasons, I formulate hopeism as a research programme according to which we should develop concepts of God by starting with the question of what type of being would be worthy of our utmost hope. I compare this view with belief-based concepts of God, such as perfect being theism and what I call worship-worthiness theism. Arguably, the greatest benefit of choosing hopeism is that it is inclusive. Most atheists as well as agnostics and theists can endorse the view. I also suggest a number of directions in which hopeism can be developed.","PeriodicalId":41136,"journal":{"name":"Studia Theologica-Nordic Journal of Theology","volume":"11 1","pages":"172 - 192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Theologica-Nordic Journal of Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0039338X.2021.1954084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统上,宗教哲学家把注意力集中在对上帝的信仰上,并根据这种信仰是否具有某种认识论地位(如“合理性”或“概率”)来评估这种信仰,或者确定它是否构成知识。在本文中,我将重点关注希望的非对立态度,并阐述我们是否应该希望上帝的理由。鉴于这些原因,我将希望主义表述为一个研究计划,根据这个计划,我们应该从什么样的存在值得我们寄予最大希望的问题开始,来发展上帝的概念。我将这种观点与基于信仰的上帝概念进行比较,比如完美是有神论和我称之为值得崇拜的有神论。可以说,选择乐观主义的最大好处在于它具有包容性。大多数无神论者、不可知论者和有神论者都赞同这种观点。我还提出了一些发展希望主义的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hopeism
Philosophers of religion have traditionally focused their attention on belief in God and assessed such belief in terms of it having some epistemic status like “rationality” or “probability”, or indeed by determining whether or not it constitutes knowledge. In this paper, I focus my attention on the non-doxastic attitude of hope and formulate reasons for whether or not we should hope for God. In light of these reasons, I formulate hopeism as a research programme according to which we should develop concepts of God by starting with the question of what type of being would be worthy of our utmost hope. I compare this view with belief-based concepts of God, such as perfect being theism and what I call worship-worthiness theism. Arguably, the greatest benefit of choosing hopeism is that it is inclusive. Most atheists as well as agnostics and theists can endorse the view. I also suggest a number of directions in which hopeism can be developed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊最新文献
Religion, fiction, and facts The Pastoral Activities of Archbishop Jakob Ernst von Lichtenstein­-Castelcorno (1690‒1747) Communio ecclesiarum. The Catholicity of the Church in Light of the Synodal Transformation of the Church Purgatio canonica in Medieval Canon Law The Love of Christ and His Death for All in 2 Cor 5:14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1