两种低温大气氦等离子体装置的比较,它们使用相同的射频功率发生器

Q1 Medicine Clinical Plasma Medicine Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cpme.2020.100108
Cian D. Madigan , Denis O'Sullivan , Liam O'Neill , Darren F. Kavanagh
{"title":"两种低温大气氦等离子体装置的比较,它们使用相同的射频功率发生器","authors":"Cian D. Madigan ,&nbsp;Denis O'Sullivan ,&nbsp;Liam O'Neill ,&nbsp;Darren F. Kavanagh","doi":"10.1016/j.cpme.2020.100108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This research was conducted to analyse and compare a Renuvion hand piece and TheraDep's deposition device at various gas flow rates and power settings. Both devices were powered by an Apyx Ultimate Electrosurgical generator.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Current, voltage, optical emission spectroscopy (OES) and thermal imaging were used to investigate the resulting plasma intensities and species being ionised. It was found that the Renuvion device could deliver 5.6 to 8.2 W of power whereas the Deposition Accessory was significantly less at between 1.9 and 4.2 W depending on the power setting selected. Differences in the OES results were also observed which are thought to have resulted from variations in the atmospheric entrainment between the two devices.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Taken in combination, the electrical, optical emission and thermal data analysis has demonstrated that the addition of the Deposition Accessory transforms the Renuvion electrosurgical tool from a device that operates in the coagulation and cutting arena into a device with a dramatic reduction in the energy delivered to the target tissue. Consequently, this limits the localised heating of adjacent tissue and results in a device that has controlled coagulation capability and one which is not capable of cutting tissue.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This offers significant potential to allow clinicians to evaluate applications in plasma medicine using an FDA cleared electrosurgical power source.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Plasma Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cpme.2020.100108","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of two cold atmospheric helium plasma devices which utilise the same RF power generator\",\"authors\":\"Cian D. Madigan ,&nbsp;Denis O'Sullivan ,&nbsp;Liam O'Neill ,&nbsp;Darren F. Kavanagh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cpme.2020.100108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This research was conducted to analyse and compare a Renuvion hand piece and TheraDep's deposition device at various gas flow rates and power settings. Both devices were powered by an Apyx Ultimate Electrosurgical generator.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Current, voltage, optical emission spectroscopy (OES) and thermal imaging were used to investigate the resulting plasma intensities and species being ionised. It was found that the Renuvion device could deliver 5.6 to 8.2 W of power whereas the Deposition Accessory was significantly less at between 1.9 and 4.2 W depending on the power setting selected. Differences in the OES results were also observed which are thought to have resulted from variations in the atmospheric entrainment between the two devices.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Taken in combination, the electrical, optical emission and thermal data analysis has demonstrated that the addition of the Deposition Accessory transforms the Renuvion electrosurgical tool from a device that operates in the coagulation and cutting arena into a device with a dramatic reduction in the energy delivered to the target tissue. Consequently, this limits the localised heating of adjacent tissue and results in a device that has controlled coagulation capability and one which is not capable of cutting tissue.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This offers significant potential to allow clinicians to evaluate applications in plasma medicine using an FDA cleared electrosurgical power source.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Plasma Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cpme.2020.100108\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Plasma Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212816620300159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Plasma Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212816620300159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究分析和比较Renuvion手环和TheraDep的沉积装置在不同的气体流速和功率设置下的性能。这两种设备都由Apyx终极电外科发电机供电。方法采用电流、电压、发射光谱(OES)和热成像等方法研究等离子体的强度和电离种类。结果发现,根据所选择的功率设置,Renuvion器件可以提供5.6至8.2 W的功率,而沉积附件则在1.9至4.2 W之间显着降低。OES结果的差异也被观察到,这被认为是由于两个装置之间的大气夹带变化造成的。综上所述,电、光发射和热数据分析表明,添加沉积附件将Renuvion电手术工具从凝固和切割领域的设备转变为传输到目标组织的能量大幅减少的设备。因此,这限制了邻近组织的局部加热,并产生了具有控制凝血能力和不能切割组织的装置。这为临床医生评估使用FDA批准的电外科电源在血浆医学中的应用提供了巨大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison of two cold atmospheric helium plasma devices which utilise the same RF power generator

Purpose

This research was conducted to analyse and compare a Renuvion hand piece and TheraDep's deposition device at various gas flow rates and power settings. Both devices were powered by an Apyx Ultimate Electrosurgical generator.

Methods

Current, voltage, optical emission spectroscopy (OES) and thermal imaging were used to investigate the resulting plasma intensities and species being ionised. It was found that the Renuvion device could deliver 5.6 to 8.2 W of power whereas the Deposition Accessory was significantly less at between 1.9 and 4.2 W depending on the power setting selected. Differences in the OES results were also observed which are thought to have resulted from variations in the atmospheric entrainment between the two devices.

Results

Taken in combination, the electrical, optical emission and thermal data analysis has demonstrated that the addition of the Deposition Accessory transforms the Renuvion electrosurgical tool from a device that operates in the coagulation and cutting arena into a device with a dramatic reduction in the energy delivered to the target tissue. Consequently, this limits the localised heating of adjacent tissue and results in a device that has controlled coagulation capability and one which is not capable of cutting tissue.

Conclusions

This offers significant potential to allow clinicians to evaluate applications in plasma medicine using an FDA cleared electrosurgical power source.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Plasma Medicine
Clinical Plasma Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changes in enamel after bleaching pre-treatment with non-thermal atmospheric plasma Increasing the effectivity of the antimicrobial surface of carbon quantum dots-based nanocomposite by atmospheric pressure plasma Cold atmospheric plasma treatment on failed finger perforator flap: A case report Canady cold plasma conversion system treatment: An effective inhibitor of cell viability in breast cancer molecular subtypes A comparison of two cold atmospheric helium plasma devices which utilise the same RF power generator
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1