4CPS-315评估COVID-19患者早期给予托珠单抗的有效性

R. Fernandez-Caballero, V. Arroyo, C. Herranz-Muñoz, A. Henares-López
{"title":"4CPS-315评估COVID-19患者早期给予托珠单抗的有效性","authors":"R. Fernandez-Caballero, V. Arroyo, C. Herranz-Muñoz, A. Henares-López","doi":"10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and importance From the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, tocilizumab has been positioned as an effective drug to treat cytokine release syndrome, which causes acute respiratory distress in patients with SARS-CoV2 pneumonia. Throughout these months, clinical protocols have been developed that improve the effectiveness, introducing it at the onset of symptoms. Aim and objectives To evaluate if the change in criteria for treatment with tocilizumab between the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic, introducing it at the onset of symptoms, led to an improvement in its effectiveness. Material and methods A retrospective observational study was conducted between 3 March 2020 and 15 October 2020 in patients with COVID-19 confirmed by PCR, treated with tocilizumab in a first level hospital. Demographic, clinical and pharmacotherapeutic data were collected from electronic medical records. To compare the effectiveness of treatment between the first COVID-19 wave (3 March to 31 May 2020) and the second COVID-19 wave (31 May to 15 October), we collected for each patient: days from admission to tocilizumab administration, oxygen therapy requirement, ICU stay, hospital stay and survival. Differences between quantitative and qualitative variables were analysed, applying the Student’s t test and the χ2 test (p≤0.005). Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS22.0. Results 167 patients (131 men), average age 58.9±12.6 years, were included. During the first wave, tocilizumab was administered to 100 patients. Days (average) until administration was 5±4.4. Length of hospital stay was 22.9±15.9 days. 39.0% of patients needed a stay in the ICU. Distribution of patients according to requirement for oxygen therapy: 48% high flow (HF) oxygen delivery systems, 19% low flow (LF) oxygen delivery systems and 31% with invasive mechanical ventilation. Two patients did not require oxygen therapy. The mortality rate was 28%. During the second wave, tocilizumab was administered to 67. Days (average) until administration was 2±2.2. Length (average) of hospital admission was 13.1±10.4 days. 10.1% of patients needed a stay in the ICU. Distribution of patients according to requirement for oxygen therapy: 11.6% HF and 88.4% LF. The mortality rate was 11.6%. We found statistically significant differences in length of hospital stay and mortality rate between the two groups. Conclusion and relevance The study showed that early administration of tocilizumab increased survival, decreased ICU income and shortened hospital stay. A limitation of our study was the lack of comparison between inflammatory parameters before and after administration. Further studies are needed. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest","PeriodicalId":11991,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy: Science and Practice","volume":"224 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"4CPS-315 Evaluation of the effectiveness of early administration of tocilizumab in patients with COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"R. Fernandez-Caballero, V. Arroyo, C. Herranz-Muñoz, A. Henares-López\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and importance From the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, tocilizumab has been positioned as an effective drug to treat cytokine release syndrome, which causes acute respiratory distress in patients with SARS-CoV2 pneumonia. Throughout these months, clinical protocols have been developed that improve the effectiveness, introducing it at the onset of symptoms. Aim and objectives To evaluate if the change in criteria for treatment with tocilizumab between the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic, introducing it at the onset of symptoms, led to an improvement in its effectiveness. Material and methods A retrospective observational study was conducted between 3 March 2020 and 15 October 2020 in patients with COVID-19 confirmed by PCR, treated with tocilizumab in a first level hospital. Demographic, clinical and pharmacotherapeutic data were collected from electronic medical records. To compare the effectiveness of treatment between the first COVID-19 wave (3 March to 31 May 2020) and the second COVID-19 wave (31 May to 15 October), we collected for each patient: days from admission to tocilizumab administration, oxygen therapy requirement, ICU stay, hospital stay and survival. Differences between quantitative and qualitative variables were analysed, applying the Student’s t test and the χ2 test (p≤0.005). Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS22.0. Results 167 patients (131 men), average age 58.9±12.6 years, were included. During the first wave, tocilizumab was administered to 100 patients. Days (average) until administration was 5±4.4. Length of hospital stay was 22.9±15.9 days. 39.0% of patients needed a stay in the ICU. Distribution of patients according to requirement for oxygen therapy: 48% high flow (HF) oxygen delivery systems, 19% low flow (LF) oxygen delivery systems and 31% with invasive mechanical ventilation. Two patients did not require oxygen therapy. The mortality rate was 28%. During the second wave, tocilizumab was administered to 67. Days (average) until administration was 2±2.2. Length (average) of hospital admission was 13.1±10.4 days. 10.1% of patients needed a stay in the ICU. Distribution of patients according to requirement for oxygen therapy: 11.6% HF and 88.4% LF. The mortality rate was 11.6%. We found statistically significant differences in length of hospital stay and mortality rate between the two groups. Conclusion and relevance The study showed that early administration of tocilizumab increased survival, decreased ICU income and shortened hospital stay. A limitation of our study was the lack of comparison between inflammatory parameters before and after administration. Further studies are needed. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest\",\"PeriodicalId\":11991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy: Science and Practice\",\"volume\":\"224 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy: Science and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy: Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从COVID-19大流行开始,托珠单抗就被定位为治疗细胞因子释放综合征的有效药物,细胞因子释放综合征导致SARS-CoV2肺炎患者急性呼吸窘迫。在这几个月里,已经制定了临床方案,以提高有效性,在症状出现时引入它。目的和目的评估在COVID-19大流行的第一波和第二波之间,tocilizumab治疗标准的改变,在症状出现时引入tocilizumab,是否会导致其有效性的提高。材料与方法于2020年3月3日至2020年10月15日在某一级医院接受托珠单抗治疗的PCR确诊的COVID-19患者中进行回顾性观察研究。从电子病历中收集人口统计、临床和药物治疗数据。为了比较第一波COVID-19(2020年3月3日至5月31日)和第二波COVID-19(2020年5月31日至10月15日)的治疗效果,我们收集了每位患者的数据:从入院到给予托珠单抗的天数、氧疗需求、ICU住院时间、住院时间和生存时间。采用Student’s t检验和χ2检验(p≤0.005)分析定量变量与定性变量之间的差异。采用SPSS22.0进行统计学分析。结果167例患者(男性131例),平均年龄58.9±12.6岁。在第一波治疗中,100名患者接受了托珠单抗治疗。给药前平均天数为5±4.4天。住院时间22.9±15.9 d。39.0%的患者需要在ICU住院。根据供氧需求患者分布:48%采用高流量(HF)供氧系统,19%采用低流量(LF)供氧系统,31%采用有创机械通气。2例患者不需要氧疗。死亡率为28%。在第二波中,给67例患者使用tocilizumab。给药前平均时间为2±2.2天。住院时间(平均)13.1±10.4天。10.1%的患者需要在ICU住院。患者按氧疗需求分布:HF 11.6%, LF 88.4%。死亡率为11.6%。我们发现两组在住院时间和死亡率上有统计学上的显著差异。结论及相关性研究表明,早期给药tocilizumab可提高患者生存率,降低ICU收入,缩短住院时间。我们研究的一个局限性是缺乏给药前后炎症参数的比较。需要进一步的研究。参考文献和/或致谢利益冲突无利益冲突
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
4CPS-315 Evaluation of the effectiveness of early administration of tocilizumab in patients with COVID-19
Background and importance From the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, tocilizumab has been positioned as an effective drug to treat cytokine release syndrome, which causes acute respiratory distress in patients with SARS-CoV2 pneumonia. Throughout these months, clinical protocols have been developed that improve the effectiveness, introducing it at the onset of symptoms. Aim and objectives To evaluate if the change in criteria for treatment with tocilizumab between the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic, introducing it at the onset of symptoms, led to an improvement in its effectiveness. Material and methods A retrospective observational study was conducted between 3 March 2020 and 15 October 2020 in patients with COVID-19 confirmed by PCR, treated with tocilizumab in a first level hospital. Demographic, clinical and pharmacotherapeutic data were collected from electronic medical records. To compare the effectiveness of treatment between the first COVID-19 wave (3 March to 31 May 2020) and the second COVID-19 wave (31 May to 15 October), we collected for each patient: days from admission to tocilizumab administration, oxygen therapy requirement, ICU stay, hospital stay and survival. Differences between quantitative and qualitative variables were analysed, applying the Student’s t test and the χ2 test (p≤0.005). Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS22.0. Results 167 patients (131 men), average age 58.9±12.6 years, were included. During the first wave, tocilizumab was administered to 100 patients. Days (average) until administration was 5±4.4. Length of hospital stay was 22.9±15.9 days. 39.0% of patients needed a stay in the ICU. Distribution of patients according to requirement for oxygen therapy: 48% high flow (HF) oxygen delivery systems, 19% low flow (LF) oxygen delivery systems and 31% with invasive mechanical ventilation. Two patients did not require oxygen therapy. The mortality rate was 28%. During the second wave, tocilizumab was administered to 67. Days (average) until administration was 2±2.2. Length (average) of hospital admission was 13.1±10.4 days. 10.1% of patients needed a stay in the ICU. Distribution of patients according to requirement for oxygen therapy: 11.6% HF and 88.4% LF. The mortality rate was 11.6%. We found statistically significant differences in length of hospital stay and mortality rate between the two groups. Conclusion and relevance The study showed that early administration of tocilizumab increased survival, decreased ICU income and shortened hospital stay. A limitation of our study was the lack of comparison between inflammatory parameters before and after administration. Further studies are needed. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
4CPS-279 Cancer pain management approach considering potential drug interactions in patients receiving oral antitumour treatment 2SPD-048 Political report—options to break through medicine shortages 4CPS-239 Therapeutic drug monitoring of gentamicin in neonates 4CPS-390 Dispensing of anticancer investigational drugs during lockdown for the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: experience in an oncological centre 4CPS-269 Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy associated with cytoreductive surgery in peritoneal cancer treatments: a multidisciplinary experience to evaluate its efficacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1