符合规范和不符合规范的RC墙抗震性能评价

IF 0.9 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Australian Journal of Structural Engineering Pub Date : 2022-10-26 DOI:10.1080/13287982.2022.2133721
Ali Siddique, Tahir Mehmood, S. Qazi, Shahzad Khan, Adnan Nawaz, R. F. Tufail
{"title":"符合规范和不符合规范的RC墙抗震性能评价","authors":"Ali Siddique, Tahir Mehmood, S. Qazi, Shahzad Khan, Adnan Nawaz, R. F. Tufail","doi":"10.1080/13287982.2022.2133721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Pakistan’s unique geographical location has made it seismically vulnerable. Owing to this, recent earthquakes have revealed the susceptibility of the existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings in Pakistan. This has raised concerns about the structural performance of RC buildings because most mid-rise RC buildings in Pakistan have shear wall lateral force resisting systems. In this study, a survey of existing mid-rise RC buildings in Pakistan's capital territory is used to develop a database of existing RC shear walls. By using this database, this research aims to provide a seismic performance assessment of existing RC shear walls to determine their deficiencies and provide necessary experimental data for retrofitting. Two RC shear wall specimens SW1 and SW2, representing the characteristics of existing RC shear walls are tested under quasi-static loading. The seismic response of the existing RC mid-rise walls is assessed through the mode of failure, hysteretic behavior, energy dissipation, flexure and shear stiffness, and curvature distribution. The findings reveal that the existing mid-rise RC walls in the region did not satisfy the performance criteria recommended by different seismic codes. Hence a comprehensive retrofitting strategy with building code compliance are prerequisites to avoid infrastructural and economic losses due to seismic activity.","PeriodicalId":45617,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seismic performance evaluation of code compliant and non-compliant RC walls\",\"authors\":\"Ali Siddique, Tahir Mehmood, S. Qazi, Shahzad Khan, Adnan Nawaz, R. F. Tufail\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13287982.2022.2133721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Pakistan’s unique geographical location has made it seismically vulnerable. Owing to this, recent earthquakes have revealed the susceptibility of the existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings in Pakistan. This has raised concerns about the structural performance of RC buildings because most mid-rise RC buildings in Pakistan have shear wall lateral force resisting systems. In this study, a survey of existing mid-rise RC buildings in Pakistan's capital territory is used to develop a database of existing RC shear walls. By using this database, this research aims to provide a seismic performance assessment of existing RC shear walls to determine their deficiencies and provide necessary experimental data for retrofitting. Two RC shear wall specimens SW1 and SW2, representing the characteristics of existing RC shear walls are tested under quasi-static loading. The seismic response of the existing RC mid-rise walls is assessed through the mode of failure, hysteretic behavior, energy dissipation, flexure and shear stiffness, and curvature distribution. The findings reveal that the existing mid-rise RC walls in the region did not satisfy the performance criteria recommended by different seismic codes. Hence a comprehensive retrofitting strategy with building code compliance are prerequisites to avoid infrastructural and economic losses due to seismic activity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2022.2133721\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2022.2133721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

巴基斯坦独特的地理位置使其易受地震影响。因此,最近的地震揭示了巴基斯坦现有钢筋混凝土(RC)建筑的易感性。这引起了人们对钢筋混凝土建筑结构性能的关注,因为巴基斯坦大多数中层钢筋混凝土建筑都有剪力墙抗侧力系统。在本研究中,对巴基斯坦首都地区现有中层钢筋混凝土建筑进行调查,以开发现有钢筋混凝土剪力墙数据库。利用该数据库,本研究旨在对现有RC剪力墙进行抗震性能评估,以确定其不足之处,并为改造提供必要的实验数据。拟静力荷载作用下,对代表既有RC剪力墙特性的两个试件SW1和SW2进行了试验研究。通过破坏模式、滞回行为、能量耗散、弯剪刚度和曲率分布来评估现有RC中高层墙的地震响应。研究结果表明,该地区现有的中高层混凝土墙不符合不同抗震规范推荐的性能标准。因此,符合建筑规范的全面改造策略是避免地震活动造成的基础设施和经济损失的先决条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Seismic performance evaluation of code compliant and non-compliant RC walls
ABSTRACT Pakistan’s unique geographical location has made it seismically vulnerable. Owing to this, recent earthquakes have revealed the susceptibility of the existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings in Pakistan. This has raised concerns about the structural performance of RC buildings because most mid-rise RC buildings in Pakistan have shear wall lateral force resisting systems. In this study, a survey of existing mid-rise RC buildings in Pakistan's capital territory is used to develop a database of existing RC shear walls. By using this database, this research aims to provide a seismic performance assessment of existing RC shear walls to determine their deficiencies and provide necessary experimental data for retrofitting. Two RC shear wall specimens SW1 and SW2, representing the characteristics of existing RC shear walls are tested under quasi-static loading. The seismic response of the existing RC mid-rise walls is assessed through the mode of failure, hysteretic behavior, energy dissipation, flexure and shear stiffness, and curvature distribution. The findings reveal that the existing mid-rise RC walls in the region did not satisfy the performance criteria recommended by different seismic codes. Hence a comprehensive retrofitting strategy with building code compliance are prerequisites to avoid infrastructural and economic losses due to seismic activity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Structural Engineering (AJSE) is published under the auspices of the Structural College Board of Engineers Australia. It fulfils part of the Board''s mission for Continuing Professional Development. The journal also offers a means for exchange and interaction of scientific and professional issues and technical developments. The journal is open to members and non-members of Engineers Australia. Original papers on research and development (Technical Papers) and professional matters and achievements (Professional Papers) in all areas relevant to the science, art and practice of structural engineering are considered for possible publication. All papers and technical notes are peer-reviewed. The fundamental criterion for acceptance for publication is the intellectual and professional value of the contribution. Occasionally, papers previously published in essentially the same form elsewhere may be considered for publication. In this case acknowledgement to prior publication must be included in a footnote on page one of the manuscript. These papers are peer-reviewed as new submissions. The length of acceptable contributions typically should not exceed 4,000 to 5,000 word equivalents. Longer manuscripts may be considered at the discretion of the Editor. Technical Notes typically should not exceed about 1,000 word equivalents. Discussions on a Paper or Note published in the AJSE are welcomed. Discussions must address significant matters related to the content of a Paper or Technical Note and may include supplementary and critical comments and questions regarding content.
期刊最新文献
Performance evaluation of concrete comprising sugarcane bagasse ash and recycled polyethylene terephthalate Improving seismic performance of structural systems via reinforcing column bases Evaluation on structural performance of hybrid composite post-tension plate girder through finite element analysis Determination of response modification coefficient of SPSW in RC frame using plastic design method A plastic hinge method for static pushover analysis of 3D frame structures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1