拜厄特《占有》与《传记作家的故事》对后现代主义的颠覆

Reci Beograd Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5937/reci2114174c
Stefan Čizmar
{"title":"拜厄特《占有》与《传记作家的故事》对后现代主义的颠覆","authors":"Stefan Čizmar","doi":"10.5937/reci2114174c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A.S. Byatt's works have had an intricate relationship with postmodernism, and this relationship is probably best exhibited in Possession and The Biographer's Tale. Both novels display complex webs of allusions, references, play with genre and form, as well as intense self-reflection, all of which can be seen as typical postmodern features. However, it can be argued that both novels go beyond that, and instead of merely being self-reflexive, they are primarily intensely reflexive of their status as postmodern works. In other words, both novels seek to examine and parody postmodernism from the inside, thus subverting it and transcending it by going beyond its typical features. This approach to writing can be referred to as meta-postmodern since the novels essentially use postmodern techniques to discuss postmodernism, as well as to contrast it with some other periods of literary history and/or approaches to literature and scholarship in general. The aim of the following paper is to examine these characteristics of the novels and to find an apt description of Byatt's narrative style.","PeriodicalId":33797,"journal":{"name":"Reci Beograd","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The subversion of postmodernism in A.S. Byatt's Possession and The biographer's tale\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Čizmar\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/reci2114174c\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A.S. Byatt's works have had an intricate relationship with postmodernism, and this relationship is probably best exhibited in Possession and The Biographer's Tale. Both novels display complex webs of allusions, references, play with genre and form, as well as intense self-reflection, all of which can be seen as typical postmodern features. However, it can be argued that both novels go beyond that, and instead of merely being self-reflexive, they are primarily intensely reflexive of their status as postmodern works. In other words, both novels seek to examine and parody postmodernism from the inside, thus subverting it and transcending it by going beyond its typical features. This approach to writing can be referred to as meta-postmodern since the novels essentially use postmodern techniques to discuss postmodernism, as well as to contrast it with some other periods of literary history and/or approaches to literature and scholarship in general. The aim of the following paper is to examine these characteristics of the novels and to find an apt description of Byatt's narrative style.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reci Beograd\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reci Beograd\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/reci2114174c\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reci Beograd","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/reci2114174c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

拜厄特的作品与后现代主义有着错综复杂的关系,这种关系在《占有》和《传记作家的故事》中得到了最好的体现。这两部小说都展现了复杂的典故、参考、体裁和形式的游戏以及强烈的自我反思,这些都可以被视为典型的后现代特征。然而,可以说,两部小说都超越了这一点,它们不仅仅是自我反思,它们主要是对自己作为后现代作品的地位进行了强烈的反思。换句话说,两部小说都试图从内部审视和模仿后现代主义,从而通过超越其典型特征来颠覆和超越后现代主义。这种写作方法可以被称为元后现代,因为小说本质上使用后现代的技巧来讨论后现代主义,并将其与其他一些时期的文学史和/或文学和学术方法进行比较。本文的目的是研究这些小说的特点,并找到一个恰当的描述拜厄特的叙事风格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The subversion of postmodernism in A.S. Byatt's Possession and The biographer's tale
A.S. Byatt's works have had an intricate relationship with postmodernism, and this relationship is probably best exhibited in Possession and The Biographer's Tale. Both novels display complex webs of allusions, references, play with genre and form, as well as intense self-reflection, all of which can be seen as typical postmodern features. However, it can be argued that both novels go beyond that, and instead of merely being self-reflexive, they are primarily intensely reflexive of their status as postmodern works. In other words, both novels seek to examine and parody postmodernism from the inside, thus subverting it and transcending it by going beyond its typical features. This approach to writing can be referred to as meta-postmodern since the novels essentially use postmodern techniques to discuss postmodernism, as well as to contrast it with some other periods of literary history and/or approaches to literature and scholarship in general. The aim of the following paper is to examine these characteristics of the novels and to find an apt description of Byatt's narrative style.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ksenija Atanasijevic on ethical foundation of feminism Intertextuality in the short story "The Death of Robert Browning" by Jane Urquhart Education as the way to "A Woman's Liberation": One of Ursula Le Guin's four ways to forgiveness The use of literary contents in English language teaching The first impasse, a drop of darkness: Influence of gnostic teachings on Emil Cioran's antinatalistic thought
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1