减少处方型阿片类药物使用障碍患者阿片类药物使用的灵活丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮护理模式:一项开放标签、实用、非自卑随机对照试验

D. Jutras-Aswad, B. Le Foll, K. Ahamad, Ronald Lim, J. Bruneau, Benedikt Fischer, Jürgen Rehm, T. Wild, Evan Wood, S. Brissette, Lea Gagnon, Jill Fikowski, Omar Ledjiar, Benoît Mâsse, M. Socías
{"title":"减少处方型阿片类药物使用障碍患者阿片类药物使用的灵活丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮护理模式:一项开放标签、实用、非自卑随机对照试验","authors":"D. Jutras-Aswad, B. Le Foll, K. Ahamad, Ronald Lim, J. Bruneau, Benedikt Fischer, Jürgen Rehm, T. Wild, Evan Wood, S. Brissette, Lea Gagnon, Jill Fikowski, Omar Ledjiar, Benoît Mâsse, M. Socías","doi":"10.1176/appi.ajp.21090964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nExtensive exposure to prescription-type opioids has resulted in major harm worldwide, calling for better-adapted approaches to opioid agonist therapy. The authors aimed to determine whether flexible take-home buprenorphine/naloxone is as effective as supervised methadone in reducing opioid use in prescription-type opioid consumers with opioid use disorder.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis seven-site, pan-Canadian, 24-week, pragmatic, open-label, noninferiority, two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial involved treatment-seeking adults with prescription-type opioid use disorder. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to treatment with sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone (target dosage, 8 mg/2 mg to 24 mg/6 mg per day; flexible take-home dosing) or oral methadone (≈60-120 mg/day; closely supervised). The primary outcome was the proportion of opioid-free urine drug screens over 24 weeks (noninferiority margin, 15%). All randomized participants were analyzed, excluding one who died shortly after randomization, for the primary analysis (modified intention-to-treat analysis).\n\n\nRESULTS\nOf 272 participants recruited (mean age, 39 years [SD=11]; 34.2% female), 138 were randomized to buprenorphine/naloxone and 134 to methadone. The mean proportion of opioid-free urine drug screens was 24.0% (SD=34.4) in the buprenorphine/naloxone group and 18.5% (SD=30.5) in the methadone group, with a 5.6% adjusted mean difference (95% CI=-0.3, +∞). Participants in the buprenorphine/naloxone group had 0.47 times the odds (95% CI=0.24, 0.90) of being retained in the assigned treatment compared with those in the methadone group. Overall, 24 drug-related adverse events were reported (12 in the buprenorphine/naloxone group [N=8/138; 5.7%] and 12 in the methadone group [N=12/134; 9.0%]) and mostly included withdrawal, hypogonadism, and overdose.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe buprenorphine/naloxone flexible model of care was safe and noninferior to methadone in reducing opioid use among people with prescription-type opioid use disorder. This flexibility could help expand access to opioid agonist therapy and reduce harms in the context of the opioid overdose crisis.","PeriodicalId":74938,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of psychiatry residents' journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"appiajp21090964"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flexible Buprenorphine/Naloxone Model of Care for Reducing Opioid Use in Individuals With Prescription-Type Opioid Use Disorder: An Open-Label, Pragmatic, Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"D. Jutras-Aswad, B. Le Foll, K. Ahamad, Ronald Lim, J. Bruneau, Benedikt Fischer, Jürgen Rehm, T. Wild, Evan Wood, S. Brissette, Lea Gagnon, Jill Fikowski, Omar Ledjiar, Benoît Mâsse, M. Socías\",\"doi\":\"10.1176/appi.ajp.21090964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\nExtensive exposure to prescription-type opioids has resulted in major harm worldwide, calling for better-adapted approaches to opioid agonist therapy. The authors aimed to determine whether flexible take-home buprenorphine/naloxone is as effective as supervised methadone in reducing opioid use in prescription-type opioid consumers with opioid use disorder.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nThis seven-site, pan-Canadian, 24-week, pragmatic, open-label, noninferiority, two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial involved treatment-seeking adults with prescription-type opioid use disorder. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to treatment with sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone (target dosage, 8 mg/2 mg to 24 mg/6 mg per day; flexible take-home dosing) or oral methadone (≈60-120 mg/day; closely supervised). The primary outcome was the proportion of opioid-free urine drug screens over 24 weeks (noninferiority margin, 15%). All randomized participants were analyzed, excluding one who died shortly after randomization, for the primary analysis (modified intention-to-treat analysis).\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nOf 272 participants recruited (mean age, 39 years [SD=11]; 34.2% female), 138 were randomized to buprenorphine/naloxone and 134 to methadone. The mean proportion of opioid-free urine drug screens was 24.0% (SD=34.4) in the buprenorphine/naloxone group and 18.5% (SD=30.5) in the methadone group, with a 5.6% adjusted mean difference (95% CI=-0.3, +∞). Participants in the buprenorphine/naloxone group had 0.47 times the odds (95% CI=0.24, 0.90) of being retained in the assigned treatment compared with those in the methadone group. Overall, 24 drug-related adverse events were reported (12 in the buprenorphine/naloxone group [N=8/138; 5.7%] and 12 in the methadone group [N=12/134; 9.0%]) and mostly included withdrawal, hypogonadism, and overdose.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nThe buprenorphine/naloxone flexible model of care was safe and noninferior to methadone in reducing opioid use among people with prescription-type opioid use disorder. This flexibility could help expand access to opioid agonist therapy and reduce harms in the context of the opioid overdose crisis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American journal of psychiatry residents' journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"appiajp21090964\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American journal of psychiatry residents' journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.21090964\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of psychiatry residents' journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.21090964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

目的:处方型阿片类药物的广泛暴露已在世界范围内造成重大危害,呼吁更好地适应阿片类药物激动剂治疗方法。作者旨在确定灵活的丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮在减少阿片类药物使用障碍的处方型阿片类药物消费者的阿片类药物使用方面是否与监督美沙酮一样有效。方法:这项为期24周、实用、开放标签、非效性、双平行随机对照试验涉及寻求治疗的处方型阿片类药物使用障碍的成年人。参与者按1:1的比例随机接受丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮舌下治疗(目标剂量,每天8mg / 2mg至24mg / 6mg;灵活的带回家剂量)或口服美沙酮(≈60- 120mg /天;密切监督)。主要终点是24周内无阿片类药物尿液药物筛查的比例(非劣效边际,15%)。对所有随机分组的参与者进行分析,排除随机分组后不久死亡的参与者,进行初步分析(修改意向治疗分析)。结果招募的272名受试者(平均年龄39岁[SD=11];34.2%女性),138例随机分配丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮组,134例随机分配美沙酮组。丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮组无阿片类药物尿药物筛查的平均比例为24.0% (SD=34.4),美沙酮组为18.5% (SD=30.5),校正后平均差异为5.6% (95% CI=-0.3, +∞)。与美沙酮组相比,丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮组的参与者保留指定治疗的几率为0.47倍(95% CI=0.24, 0.90)。总体而言,报告了24例药物相关不良事件(丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮组12例[N=8/138;5.7%],美沙酮组12例[N=12/134;9.0%]),主要包括戒断、性腺功能减退和过量服用。结论丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮灵活护理模式在减少处方型阿片类药物使用障碍患者阿片类药物使用方面安全且不逊于美沙酮。这种灵活性可以帮助扩大获得阿片类药物激动剂治疗的机会,并在阿片类药物过量危机的背景下减少危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Flexible Buprenorphine/Naloxone Model of Care for Reducing Opioid Use in Individuals With Prescription-Type Opioid Use Disorder: An Open-Label, Pragmatic, Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.
OBJECTIVE Extensive exposure to prescription-type opioids has resulted in major harm worldwide, calling for better-adapted approaches to opioid agonist therapy. The authors aimed to determine whether flexible take-home buprenorphine/naloxone is as effective as supervised methadone in reducing opioid use in prescription-type opioid consumers with opioid use disorder. METHODS This seven-site, pan-Canadian, 24-week, pragmatic, open-label, noninferiority, two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial involved treatment-seeking adults with prescription-type opioid use disorder. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to treatment with sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone (target dosage, 8 mg/2 mg to 24 mg/6 mg per day; flexible take-home dosing) or oral methadone (≈60-120 mg/day; closely supervised). The primary outcome was the proportion of opioid-free urine drug screens over 24 weeks (noninferiority margin, 15%). All randomized participants were analyzed, excluding one who died shortly after randomization, for the primary analysis (modified intention-to-treat analysis). RESULTS Of 272 participants recruited (mean age, 39 years [SD=11]; 34.2% female), 138 were randomized to buprenorphine/naloxone and 134 to methadone. The mean proportion of opioid-free urine drug screens was 24.0% (SD=34.4) in the buprenorphine/naloxone group and 18.5% (SD=30.5) in the methadone group, with a 5.6% adjusted mean difference (95% CI=-0.3, +∞). Participants in the buprenorphine/naloxone group had 0.47 times the odds (95% CI=0.24, 0.90) of being retained in the assigned treatment compared with those in the methadone group. Overall, 24 drug-related adverse events were reported (12 in the buprenorphine/naloxone group [N=8/138; 5.7%] and 12 in the methadone group [N=12/134; 9.0%]) and mostly included withdrawal, hypogonadism, and overdose. CONCLUSIONS The buprenorphine/naloxone flexible model of care was safe and noninferior to methadone in reducing opioid use among people with prescription-type opioid use disorder. This flexibility could help expand access to opioid agonist therapy and reduce harms in the context of the opioid overdose crisis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trazodone-Induced Priapism and Increased Recurrence Risk With Antipsychotics Visual Media: An Aperture Into the Past and Future of Psychiatry The Unseen Stars: Girls With Autism Antipsychotic Use During Posttraumatic Amnesia in Traumatic Brain Injury Classic Psychedelics for the Treatment of Depressive Disorders: An Update for Psychiatrists in Training
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1