LTE上行链路中TCP拥塞控制算法的测量分析

A. Parichehreh, Stefan Alfredsson, A. Brunström
{"title":"LTE上行链路中TCP拥塞控制算法的测量分析","authors":"A. Parichehreh, Stefan Alfredsson, A. Brunström","doi":"10.23919/TMA.2018.8506522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The unprecedented growth of user generated contents yielded by the proliferation of social networks applications, cellular based video surveillance and device-to-device (D2D) communication, makes the cellular uplink communication an attractive topic. In this paper we conduct a systematic evaluation and measurement analysis to characterize cellular uplink traffic and compare its interplay with different TCP congestion control algorithms (CCA), namely NewReno, Cubic, and BBR, in both stationary and mobility scenarios. The evaluation encompasses average throughput, average round trip time (RTT), fairness among simultaneous flows, and packet retransmission. The intended behavior of BBR has been observed in LTE uplink, but some severe issues such as lack of fairness among simultaneous flows and massive on device packet losses have been observed. It is observed that the lack of fairness among simultaneous flows can unpredictably change the throughput of multi-flow applications.","PeriodicalId":6607,"journal":{"name":"2018 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA)","volume":"180 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement Analysis of TCP Congestion Control Algorithms in LTE Uplink\",\"authors\":\"A. Parichehreh, Stefan Alfredsson, A. Brunström\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/TMA.2018.8506522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The unprecedented growth of user generated contents yielded by the proliferation of social networks applications, cellular based video surveillance and device-to-device (D2D) communication, makes the cellular uplink communication an attractive topic. In this paper we conduct a systematic evaluation and measurement analysis to characterize cellular uplink traffic and compare its interplay with different TCP congestion control algorithms (CCA), namely NewReno, Cubic, and BBR, in both stationary and mobility scenarios. The evaluation encompasses average throughput, average round trip time (RTT), fairness among simultaneous flows, and packet retransmission. The intended behavior of BBR has been observed in LTE uplink, but some severe issues such as lack of fairness among simultaneous flows and massive on device packet losses have been observed. It is observed that the lack of fairness among simultaneous flows can unpredictably change the throughput of multi-flow applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA)\",\"volume\":\"180 1\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/TMA.2018.8506522\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/TMA.2018.8506522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

由于社交网络应用、基于蜂窝的视频监控和设备对设备(D2D)通信的激增,用户生成内容的空前增长,使得蜂窝上行通信成为一个有吸引力的话题。在本文中,我们进行了系统的评估和测量分析,以表征蜂窝上行流量,并比较其在固定和移动场景下与不同TCP拥塞控制算法(CCA)(即NewReno, Cubic和BBR)的相互作用。评估包括平均吞吐量、平均往返时间(RTT)、同时流之间的公平性和数据包重传。在LTE上行链路中已经观察到BBR的预期行为,但是已经观察到一些严重的问题,例如同时流之间缺乏公平性和大量设备上的数据包丢失。同时流之间缺乏公平性会不可预测地改变多流应用程序的吞吐量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measurement Analysis of TCP Congestion Control Algorithms in LTE Uplink
The unprecedented growth of user generated contents yielded by the proliferation of social networks applications, cellular based video surveillance and device-to-device (D2D) communication, makes the cellular uplink communication an attractive topic. In this paper we conduct a systematic evaluation and measurement analysis to characterize cellular uplink traffic and compare its interplay with different TCP congestion control algorithms (CCA), namely NewReno, Cubic, and BBR, in both stationary and mobility scenarios. The evaluation encompasses average throughput, average round trip time (RTT), fairness among simultaneous flows, and packet retransmission. The intended behavior of BBR has been observed in LTE uplink, but some severe issues such as lack of fairness among simultaneous flows and massive on device packet losses have been observed. It is observed that the lack of fairness among simultaneous flows can unpredictably change the throughput of multi-flow applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Analysis of Network Measurements Through Machine Learning: The Power of the Crowd App for Dynamic Crowdsourced QoE Studies of HTTP Adaptive Streaming on Mobile Devices Dmap: Automating Domain Name Ecosystem Measurements and Applications Anycaston the Move: A Look at Mobile Anycast Performance A Second Screen Journey to the Cup: Twitter Dynamics During the Stanley Cup Playoffs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1