{"title":"过多的巴什维尔:萧伯纳的“杰作”及其衍生的音乐剧","authors":"Derek Mcgovern","doi":"10.5325/shaw.39.2.0204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Shaw’s 1901 play The Admirable Bashville, itself an adaptation of his novel Cashel Byron’s Profession, has twice been adapted for the professional musical stage. In the first of these adaptations, the 1983 Bashville, Shaw’s play was left largely untouched in favor of an outwardly reverential adaptation that inserted songs at various points in the original text and expanded its nonspeaking cast to allow for large-scale musical ensembles. In contrast, the 1995 Bashville in Love was a much smaller-scale work that took considerable liberties with its source material. This article analyzes the textual changes and musical treatments in both works and concludes that the latter adaptation, in spite of its numerous departures from Shaw’s play, is in fact the more Shavian of the two musicals.","PeriodicalId":40781,"journal":{"name":"Shaw-The Journal of Bernard Shaw Studies","volume":"118 1","pages":"204 - 225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Plethora of Bashvilles: Shaw’s “Masterpiece” and the Musicals It Spawned\",\"authors\":\"Derek Mcgovern\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/shaw.39.2.0204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:Shaw’s 1901 play The Admirable Bashville, itself an adaptation of his novel Cashel Byron’s Profession, has twice been adapted for the professional musical stage. In the first of these adaptations, the 1983 Bashville, Shaw’s play was left largely untouched in favor of an outwardly reverential adaptation that inserted songs at various points in the original text and expanded its nonspeaking cast to allow for large-scale musical ensembles. In contrast, the 1995 Bashville in Love was a much smaller-scale work that took considerable liberties with its source material. This article analyzes the textual changes and musical treatments in both works and concludes that the latter adaptation, in spite of its numerous departures from Shaw’s play, is in fact the more Shavian of the two musicals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shaw-The Journal of Bernard Shaw Studies\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"204 - 225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shaw-The Journal of Bernard Shaw Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/shaw.39.2.0204\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shaw-The Journal of Bernard Shaw Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/shaw.39.2.0204","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Plethora of Bashvilles: Shaw’s “Masterpiece” and the Musicals It Spawned
ABSTRACT:Shaw’s 1901 play The Admirable Bashville, itself an adaptation of his novel Cashel Byron’s Profession, has twice been adapted for the professional musical stage. In the first of these adaptations, the 1983 Bashville, Shaw’s play was left largely untouched in favor of an outwardly reverential adaptation that inserted songs at various points in the original text and expanded its nonspeaking cast to allow for large-scale musical ensembles. In contrast, the 1995 Bashville in Love was a much smaller-scale work that took considerable liberties with its source material. This article analyzes the textual changes and musical treatments in both works and concludes that the latter adaptation, in spite of its numerous departures from Shaw’s play, is in fact the more Shavian of the two musicals.