马来西亚的共同作者和研究合作模式

M. Cheng, Kai Wah Hen, H. Tan, Kuk Fai Fok
{"title":"马来西亚的共同作者和研究合作模式","authors":"M. Cheng, Kai Wah Hen, H. Tan, Kuk Fai Fok","doi":"10.1108/AP-12-2012-0094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – By exploring the patterns of co-authorship, this paper aims to identify the degree and type of research collaboration in Malaysia. Design/methodology/approach – A total of 22,244 publication records from five research universities in Malaysia were retrieved from Scopus database. Journal articles published for the period between 2008 and October 2011 were collected. Indicators such as number of authors, subject areas, number of local institutions and foreign countries, were analysed using simple statistical tools to identity the degree and type of collaboration. Findings – The findings reveal that in Malaysia, researchers tend to work in teams but collaboration is more dominant in science-based research than social sciences. Academics published extensively with their colleagues from the same university or from other academic institutions, but there is little collaboration with researchers from public research institutes or industry. In terms of international collaboration, Iran, India, UK, Japan ...","PeriodicalId":55449,"journal":{"name":"Aslib Proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of co-authorship and research collaboration in Malaysia\",\"authors\":\"M. Cheng, Kai Wah Hen, H. Tan, Kuk Fai Fok\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/AP-12-2012-0094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – By exploring the patterns of co-authorship, this paper aims to identify the degree and type of research collaboration in Malaysia. Design/methodology/approach – A total of 22,244 publication records from five research universities in Malaysia were retrieved from Scopus database. Journal articles published for the period between 2008 and October 2011 were collected. Indicators such as number of authors, subject areas, number of local institutions and foreign countries, were analysed using simple statistical tools to identity the degree and type of collaboration. Findings – The findings reveal that in Malaysia, researchers tend to work in teams but collaboration is more dominant in science-based research than social sciences. Academics published extensively with their colleagues from the same university or from other academic institutions, but there is little collaboration with researchers from public research institutes or industry. In terms of international collaboration, Iran, India, UK, Japan ...\",\"PeriodicalId\":55449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aslib Proceedings\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aslib Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/AP-12-2012-0094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aslib Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/AP-12-2012-0094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

目的-通过探索合作模式,本文旨在确定马来西亚研究合作的程度和类型。设计/方法/方法-从Scopus数据库中检索了来自马来西亚五所研究型大学的总计22244份出版记录。收集了2008年至2011年10月期间发表的期刊文章。使用简单的统计工具分析了诸如作者数量、学科领域、本地机构数量和外国数量等指标,以确定合作的程度和类型。研究结果——研究结果表明,在马来西亚,科学家倾向于团队工作,但是在基于科学的研究中,合作比社会科学更占主导地位。学者们与来自同一所大学或其他学术机构的同事广泛发表文章,但很少与公共研究机构或行业的研究人员合作。在国际合作方面,伊朗、印度、英国、日本……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patterns of co-authorship and research collaboration in Malaysia
Purpose – By exploring the patterns of co-authorship, this paper aims to identify the degree and type of research collaboration in Malaysia. Design/methodology/approach – A total of 22,244 publication records from five research universities in Malaysia were retrieved from Scopus database. Journal articles published for the period between 2008 and October 2011 were collected. Indicators such as number of authors, subject areas, number of local institutions and foreign countries, were analysed using simple statistical tools to identity the degree and type of collaboration. Findings – The findings reveal that in Malaysia, researchers tend to work in teams but collaboration is more dominant in science-based research than social sciences. Academics published extensively with their colleagues from the same university or from other academic institutions, but there is little collaboration with researchers from public research institutes or industry. In terms of international collaboration, Iran, India, UK, Japan ...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aslib Proceedings
Aslib Proceedings 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unearthing historical insights: semantic organization and application of historical newspapers from a fine-grained knowledge element perspective Investigating the consumption behavior of young adults using online food delivery platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic Factors influencing customer satisfaction with AR shopping assistant applications in e-commerce: an empirical analysis utilizing text-mining techniques The role of positive online reviews in risk-based consumer behaviours: an information processing perspective Assessing the informational credibility of conspiracy theories: online discussion about the Nord Stream damage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1