防止劫持和杀害人质:国际法律规定

Q3 Social Sciences InterEULawEast Pub Date : 2021-07-15 DOI:10.22598/IELE.2021.8.1.8
Oleksandr Sainchyn, O. Kuchynska, Y. Tsyganyuk, M. Hromova
{"title":"防止劫持和杀害人质:国际法律规定","authors":"Oleksandr Sainchyn, O. Kuchynska, Y. Tsyganyuk, M. Hromova","doi":"10.22598/IELE.2021.8.1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the 21st century, the threat of international terrorism has replaced the threat of “classic” military confrontations inherent in previous centuries. Despite the fact that terrorist attacks are usually aimed at achieving political goals, however, human lives often become a means of achieving such goals, which creates many challenges not only for world politics and global security but also for internal legal regulation. The issue of the legal definition of the taking and killing of hostages as the methods and types of committing terrorist acts is often fraught with significant difficulties. Using the method of comparative legal analysis, this study analyzes the legal norms of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, which provide for punishment for the murder of hostages, as well as some problems of interpreting these legal norms in the context of foreign experience. Having studied these circumstances, the authors emphasize the importance of differentiating the dispositive norms of the Criminal Code of Ukraine related to the murder of hostages. The study shows that the Crimi* Oleksandr Sainchyn, Kherson State University, Odesa, Ukraine; sainchynole@ukr.net. ** Oksana Kuchynska, Institute of Law, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine; okskuchynska@ukr.net. *** Volodymyr Hryniuk, Institute of Law, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine; volhryniuk@ukr.net. **** Yuliya Tsyganyuk, Khmelnytsky Institute of Interregional Academy of Personnel Management, Khmelnytsky, Ukraine; tsyganyukyu@yahoo.com. **** Maryna Hromova, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine; marhromova@yahoo.com. Intereulaweast, Vol. VIII (1) 2021 154 nal Code of Ukraine contains identical legal norms providing for legal liability for the same criminal offense: the premeditated murder of a hostage and the taking of a hostage, which led to grave consequences. The study raises the question and encourages discussion as to whether the lack of direct intent in the killing of hostages is possible. Since scientific and theoretical developments in this direction and the practical testing of criminal law norms for the murder of a hostage and the taking of a hostage leave many open questions, criminal lawyers are given the opportunity for scientific and theoretical research.","PeriodicalId":52280,"journal":{"name":"InterEULawEast","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PREVENTION OF TAKING AND KILLING OF HOSTAGES: INTERNATIONAL LEGAL REGULATION\",\"authors\":\"Oleksandr Sainchyn, O. Kuchynska, Y. Tsyganyuk, M. Hromova\",\"doi\":\"10.22598/IELE.2021.8.1.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the 21st century, the threat of international terrorism has replaced the threat of “classic” military confrontations inherent in previous centuries. Despite the fact that terrorist attacks are usually aimed at achieving political goals, however, human lives often become a means of achieving such goals, which creates many challenges not only for world politics and global security but also for internal legal regulation. The issue of the legal definition of the taking and killing of hostages as the methods and types of committing terrorist acts is often fraught with significant difficulties. Using the method of comparative legal analysis, this study analyzes the legal norms of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, which provide for punishment for the murder of hostages, as well as some problems of interpreting these legal norms in the context of foreign experience. Having studied these circumstances, the authors emphasize the importance of differentiating the dispositive norms of the Criminal Code of Ukraine related to the murder of hostages. The study shows that the Crimi* Oleksandr Sainchyn, Kherson State University, Odesa, Ukraine; sainchynole@ukr.net. ** Oksana Kuchynska, Institute of Law, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine; okskuchynska@ukr.net. *** Volodymyr Hryniuk, Institute of Law, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine; volhryniuk@ukr.net. **** Yuliya Tsyganyuk, Khmelnytsky Institute of Interregional Academy of Personnel Management, Khmelnytsky, Ukraine; tsyganyukyu@yahoo.com. **** Maryna Hromova, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine; marhromova@yahoo.com. Intereulaweast, Vol. VIII (1) 2021 154 nal Code of Ukraine contains identical legal norms providing for legal liability for the same criminal offense: the premeditated murder of a hostage and the taking of a hostage, which led to grave consequences. The study raises the question and encourages discussion as to whether the lack of direct intent in the killing of hostages is possible. Since scientific and theoretical developments in this direction and the practical testing of criminal law norms for the murder of a hostage and the taking of a hostage leave many open questions, criminal lawyers are given the opportunity for scientific and theoretical research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"InterEULawEast\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"InterEULawEast\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22598/IELE.2021.8.1.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"InterEULawEast","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22598/IELE.2021.8.1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在21世纪,国际恐怖主义的威胁已经取代了前几个世纪固有的“经典”军事对抗的威胁。尽管恐怖袭击通常以实现政治目的为目的,但人的生命往往成为实现这一目标的手段,这不仅给世界政治和全球安全带来了许多挑战,也给内部法律规制带来了许多挑战。将扣押和杀害人质的法律定义为实施恐怖主义行为的方法和类型的问题往往充满重大困难。本研究采用比较法分析的方法,分析了乌克兰《刑法》中对杀害人质的处罚规定的法律规范,以及在国外经验背景下解释这些法律规范的一些问题。在研究了这些情况之后,作者强调区分乌克兰《刑法》中与杀害人质有关的决定准则的重要性。研究表明,乌克兰敖德萨科尔森州立大学的Crimi* Oleksandr Sainchyn;sainchynole@ukr.net。**奥克萨娜·库钦斯卡,基辅塔拉斯舍甫琴科国立大学法律研究所,乌克兰基辅;okskuchynska@ukr.net。*** Volodymyr Hryniuk,基辅塔拉斯舍甫琴科国立大学法律研究所,乌克兰基辅;volhryniuk@ukr.net。****乌克兰赫梅利尼茨基地区间人事管理学院赫梅利尼茨基研究所Yuliya Tsyganyuk;tsyganyukyu@yahoo.com。**** Maryna Hromova,塔拉斯舍甫琴科基辅国立大学,乌克兰基辅;marhromova@yahoo.com。《乌克兰法典》2021年第8卷第1款载有相同的法律规范,规定了同一刑事犯罪的法律责任:有预谋地谋杀人质和劫持人质,造成严重后果。这项研究提出了一个问题,并鼓励讨论杀害人质是否可能没有直接意图。由于这方面的科学和理论发展以及对杀害人质和劫持人质的刑法规范的实际检验留下了许多悬而未决的问题,刑事律师有机会进行科学和理论研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PREVENTION OF TAKING AND KILLING OF HOSTAGES: INTERNATIONAL LEGAL REGULATION
In the 21st century, the threat of international terrorism has replaced the threat of “classic” military confrontations inherent in previous centuries. Despite the fact that terrorist attacks are usually aimed at achieving political goals, however, human lives often become a means of achieving such goals, which creates many challenges not only for world politics and global security but also for internal legal regulation. The issue of the legal definition of the taking and killing of hostages as the methods and types of committing terrorist acts is often fraught with significant difficulties. Using the method of comparative legal analysis, this study analyzes the legal norms of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, which provide for punishment for the murder of hostages, as well as some problems of interpreting these legal norms in the context of foreign experience. Having studied these circumstances, the authors emphasize the importance of differentiating the dispositive norms of the Criminal Code of Ukraine related to the murder of hostages. The study shows that the Crimi* Oleksandr Sainchyn, Kherson State University, Odesa, Ukraine; sainchynole@ukr.net. ** Oksana Kuchynska, Institute of Law, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine; okskuchynska@ukr.net. *** Volodymyr Hryniuk, Institute of Law, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine; volhryniuk@ukr.net. **** Yuliya Tsyganyuk, Khmelnytsky Institute of Interregional Academy of Personnel Management, Khmelnytsky, Ukraine; tsyganyukyu@yahoo.com. **** Maryna Hromova, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine; marhromova@yahoo.com. Intereulaweast, Vol. VIII (1) 2021 154 nal Code of Ukraine contains identical legal norms providing for legal liability for the same criminal offense: the premeditated murder of a hostage and the taking of a hostage, which led to grave consequences. The study raises the question and encourages discussion as to whether the lack of direct intent in the killing of hostages is possible. Since scientific and theoretical developments in this direction and the practical testing of criminal law norms for the murder of a hostage and the taking of a hostage leave many open questions, criminal lawyers are given the opportunity for scientific and theoretical research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
InterEULawEast
InterEULawEast Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
DYNAMIC INDUSTRIES REQUIRE A DYNAMIC APPROACH TO LAW? ON THE ILLUMINAGRAIL TAKEOVER THE DIGITAL ECONOMY AND LEGAL CHALLENGES DIGITAL RIGHTS IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM REMITTANCES ARE THE MAIN INDICATORS OF ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THE WESTERN BALKANS THE IMPACT OF THE ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND UKRAINE ON MUTUAL TRADE AND UKRAINIAN PORTS CARGO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1