人道主义战争:军事干预与人权

A. Roberts
{"title":"人道主义战争:军事干预与人权","authors":"A. Roberts","doi":"10.2307/2622308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Both these questions fall partly within the field of the legitimacy, or otherwise, of the resort to force in particular circumstances-the jus ad bellum. These particular questions are, to some extent at least, separate from the laws of war-or jus in bello-but the membrane between these fields is less permeable in fact than in legal theory. These two questions also take us beyond law, and into the fields of historical interpretation and prudential judgement. They involve ancient problems which have been debated since time immemorial. With respect to both questions, international thought and practice seem to be changing.","PeriodicalId":85307,"journal":{"name":"Population bulletin of the United Nations","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"56","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Humanitarian war: military intervention and human rights\",\"authors\":\"A. Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/2622308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Both these questions fall partly within the field of the legitimacy, or otherwise, of the resort to force in particular circumstances-the jus ad bellum. These particular questions are, to some extent at least, separate from the laws of war-or jus in bello-but the membrane between these fields is less permeable in fact than in legal theory. These two questions also take us beyond law, and into the fields of historical interpretation and prudential judgement. They involve ancient problems which have been debated since time immemorial. With respect to both questions, international thought and practice seem to be changing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Population bulletin of the United Nations\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"56\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Population bulletin of the United Nations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/2622308\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population bulletin of the United Nations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2622308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

摘要

这两个问题在一定程度上都属于在特定情况下诉诸武力的合法性范畴——即战争法。这些特殊的问题,至少在某种程度上,是与战争法分开的——或者只是空谈——但这些领域之间的隔膜实际上比法律理论更难以渗透。这两个问题也使我们超越了法律,进入了历史解释和审慎判断的领域。它们涉及自古以来就争论不休的古老问题。关于这两个问题,国际上的思想和做法似乎正在发生变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Humanitarian war: military intervention and human rights
Both these questions fall partly within the field of the legitimacy, or otherwise, of the resort to force in particular circumstances-the jus ad bellum. These particular questions are, to some extent at least, separate from the laws of war-or jus in bello-but the membrane between these fields is less permeable in fact than in legal theory. These two questions also take us beyond law, and into the fields of historical interpretation and prudential judgement. They involve ancient problems which have been debated since time immemorial. With respect to both questions, international thought and practice seem to be changing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reinventing Governments: The Promise and Perils of United Nations Peace Building From Peace – Keeping to Blood —Letting: the Travails of The U.N.* The Evolution of United Nations Peacekeeping National Interest, Humanitarianism or CNN: What Triggers UN Peace Enforcement After the Cold War?* Democracy in the United Nations. For and Against
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1