在COVID-19大流行危机期间重新思考团结运动作为基础设施:来自雅典的见解

IF 2.5 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Social Movement Studies Pub Date : 2022-10-31 DOI:10.1080/14742837.2022.2134108
Athina Arampatzi, Hara Kouki, Dimitris Pettas
{"title":"在COVID-19大流行危机期间重新思考团结运动作为基础设施:来自雅典的见解","authors":"Athina Arampatzi, Hara Kouki, Dimitris Pettas","doi":"10.1080/14742837.2022.2134108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"COVID-19 has provoked what seems to be an unprecedented rupture of life as we knew it. This article draws out key insights into the ways solidarity infrastructures were organized in Athens, Greece, during the general lockdown imposed in the country between March and May 2020. Immediately upon the imposition of the restrictions, people devised ways to provide support to those vulnerable, through a combination of local, decentralized and online solidarity movements. In order to make sense of collective action during a period when collective coexistence was banned, we read solidarity movements through the lens of social reproduction as infrastructure, aiming to unearth the visible and invisible materials, ideas, people and technologies that make up for what sustains social movements more broadly. The article draws on ethnographic research in Athens – including participant observation of solidarity movements, along with 82 questionnaire responses. Our findings suggest that emergent solidarity infrastructures build upon and expand solidarity movements forged during previous crises periods, while further contributing new ways of understanding collective action. Accordingly, solidarity movements of the current period adopted prior and novel forms of organizing, which involved groups and individuals already assuming vulnerable positions, as well as those whose vulnerability emerged during the pandemic. While aligning with health emergency measures, this solidarity infrastructure encompassed care, affect and interdependence and challenged the government’s crisis-management agendas. Eventually, thinking solidarity movements as infrastructure unsettles the divisions often encountered in relevant studies between solidarity and protest. [ FROM AUTHOR]","PeriodicalId":47507,"journal":{"name":"Social Movement Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-thinking solidarity movements as infrastructure during the COVID-19 pandemic crisis: insights from Athens\",\"authors\":\"Athina Arampatzi, Hara Kouki, Dimitris Pettas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14742837.2022.2134108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"COVID-19 has provoked what seems to be an unprecedented rupture of life as we knew it. This article draws out key insights into the ways solidarity infrastructures were organized in Athens, Greece, during the general lockdown imposed in the country between March and May 2020. Immediately upon the imposition of the restrictions, people devised ways to provide support to those vulnerable, through a combination of local, decentralized and online solidarity movements. In order to make sense of collective action during a period when collective coexistence was banned, we read solidarity movements through the lens of social reproduction as infrastructure, aiming to unearth the visible and invisible materials, ideas, people and technologies that make up for what sustains social movements more broadly. The article draws on ethnographic research in Athens – including participant observation of solidarity movements, along with 82 questionnaire responses. Our findings suggest that emergent solidarity infrastructures build upon and expand solidarity movements forged during previous crises periods, while further contributing new ways of understanding collective action. Accordingly, solidarity movements of the current period adopted prior and novel forms of organizing, which involved groups and individuals already assuming vulnerable positions, as well as those whose vulnerability emerged during the pandemic. While aligning with health emergency measures, this solidarity infrastructure encompassed care, affect and interdependence and challenged the government’s crisis-management agendas. Eventually, thinking solidarity movements as infrastructure unsettles the divisions often encountered in relevant studies between solidarity and protest. [ FROM AUTHOR]\",\"PeriodicalId\":47507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Movement Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Movement Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2022.2134108\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Movement Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2022.2134108","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

正如我们所知,COVID-19似乎引发了前所未有的生命破裂。本文对希腊雅典在2020年3月至5月实施全面封锁期间团结基础设施的组织方式进行了重要见解。在实施限制后,人们立即通过地方、分散和在线团结运动的结合,想出了向弱势群体提供支持的方法。为了在集体共存被禁止的时期理解集体行动,我们通过社会再生产的视角来解读团结运动,将其视为基础设施,旨在发掘可见和不可见的材料、思想、人员和技术,这些材料、思想、人员和技术构成了维持更广泛社会运动的基础。这篇文章借鉴了雅典的民族志研究——包括对团结运动的参与者观察,以及82份问卷调查。我们的研究结果表明,新兴的团结基础设施建立在之前危机时期形成的团结运动的基础上,并扩大了这些运动,同时进一步为理解集体行动提供了新的途径。因此,当前时期的团结运动采用了先前和新的组织形式,其中包括已经处于脆弱地位的群体和个人,以及在大流行病期间出现脆弱性的群体和个人。在与卫生应急措施保持一致的同时,这种团结基础设施涵盖了护理、影响和相互依存,并对政府的危机管理议程提出了挑战。最终,将团结运动视为基础设施,打破了在相关研究中经常遇到的团结与抗议之间的分歧。[源自作者]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Re-thinking solidarity movements as infrastructure during the COVID-19 pandemic crisis: insights from Athens
COVID-19 has provoked what seems to be an unprecedented rupture of life as we knew it. This article draws out key insights into the ways solidarity infrastructures were organized in Athens, Greece, during the general lockdown imposed in the country between March and May 2020. Immediately upon the imposition of the restrictions, people devised ways to provide support to those vulnerable, through a combination of local, decentralized and online solidarity movements. In order to make sense of collective action during a period when collective coexistence was banned, we read solidarity movements through the lens of social reproduction as infrastructure, aiming to unearth the visible and invisible materials, ideas, people and technologies that make up for what sustains social movements more broadly. The article draws on ethnographic research in Athens – including participant observation of solidarity movements, along with 82 questionnaire responses. Our findings suggest that emergent solidarity infrastructures build upon and expand solidarity movements forged during previous crises periods, while further contributing new ways of understanding collective action. Accordingly, solidarity movements of the current period adopted prior and novel forms of organizing, which involved groups and individuals already assuming vulnerable positions, as well as those whose vulnerability emerged during the pandemic. While aligning with health emergency measures, this solidarity infrastructure encompassed care, affect and interdependence and challenged the government’s crisis-management agendas. Eventually, thinking solidarity movements as infrastructure unsettles the divisions often encountered in relevant studies between solidarity and protest. [ FROM AUTHOR]
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
Offside politics during the democratic erosion: social movements and May 2023 presidential election cycle in Turkey Negotiating politics on campus: dynamic (de-)politicization among student activists in post-2011 Egypt Saving ourselves: from climate shocks to climate action Saving ourselves: from climate shocks to climate action , by Dana R. Fisher, New York, Columbia University Press, 2024, ix + 210 pp., $19.95/£16.99 (hardcover), ISBN: 9780231209304, $18.95/£15.99 (e-book), ISBN: 9780231557870 Woman, life, freedom movement: dynamics of a movement in progress Performing civic spheres: aesthetic-political public appearance in the balfour protest in Israel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1