教学民主:1945-1948年美韩军事占领下的民主与教育改革话语

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES Acta Koreana Pub Date : 2017-12-01 DOI:10.18399/ACTA.2017.20.2.008
H. Kahm
{"title":"教学民主:1945-1948年美韩军事占领下的民主与教育改革话语","authors":"H. Kahm","doi":"10.18399/ACTA.2017.20.2.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:After Liberation in 1945, the concept of democracy was introduced to southern Korea through discursively contested representations formulated by the American occupation authorities and Koreans on the political left and right. One of the main fields of contestation was in education as the Americans and Koreans advanced their own interpretations of democratic education that addressed the relationship between the individual and the state. The American perspective on democratic education was grounded in the progressive ideals sweeping the United States. However, progressivism contained an inherent contradiction as it attempted the depoliticization of education while protecting colonial-era collaborators and enforcing anti-communism. The left-wing liberal Korean perspective challenged the social and economic contradictions inherited from the colonial period by critiquing bourgeois individualism in favor of a socially-oriented democratic education. The right-wing conservative Korean position was divided between the New Education movement and democratic nationalist education, but the latter emerged as the dominant education philosophy of the Republic of Korea. Democratic nationalist education under An Ho-sang pushed an ultra-nationalist agenda that submerged individualism in favor of the state but ultimately dismayed the American occupation officials who had previously overseen education reform. The discourse of democracy in the post-Liberation period initiated an evolutionary process of democratic development that has continued through modern Korean history up to the present day.","PeriodicalId":42297,"journal":{"name":"Acta Koreana","volume":"19 1","pages":"529 - 561"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching Democracy: The Discourse of Democracy and Education Reforms under the American Military Occupation of Korea, 1945–1948\",\"authors\":\"H. Kahm\",\"doi\":\"10.18399/ACTA.2017.20.2.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:After Liberation in 1945, the concept of democracy was introduced to southern Korea through discursively contested representations formulated by the American occupation authorities and Koreans on the political left and right. One of the main fields of contestation was in education as the Americans and Koreans advanced their own interpretations of democratic education that addressed the relationship between the individual and the state. The American perspective on democratic education was grounded in the progressive ideals sweeping the United States. However, progressivism contained an inherent contradiction as it attempted the depoliticization of education while protecting colonial-era collaborators and enforcing anti-communism. The left-wing liberal Korean perspective challenged the social and economic contradictions inherited from the colonial period by critiquing bourgeois individualism in favor of a socially-oriented democratic education. The right-wing conservative Korean position was divided between the New Education movement and democratic nationalist education, but the latter emerged as the dominant education philosophy of the Republic of Korea. Democratic nationalist education under An Ho-sang pushed an ultra-nationalist agenda that submerged individualism in favor of the state but ultimately dismayed the American occupation officials who had previously overseen education reform. The discourse of democracy in the post-Liberation period initiated an evolutionary process of democratic development that has continued through modern Korean history up to the present day.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Koreana\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"529 - 561\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Koreana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18399/ACTA.2017.20.2.008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Koreana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18399/ACTA.2017.20.2.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:1945年光复后,民主的概念通过美国占领当局和韩国左翼和右翼政治人士制定的话语争议陈述被引入韩国南部。争论的主要领域之一是教育,因为美国人和韩国人对民主教育提出了自己的解释,解决了个人与国家之间的关系。美国人对民主教育的看法植根于席卷美国的进步理想。然而,进步主义在试图将教育去政治化的同时,又试图保护殖民时代的通敌者,并实施反共政策,这是一种内在的矛盾。韩国左派自由主义的观点,批判资产阶级个人主义,主张社会导向的民主主义教育,挑战殖民时期遗留下来的社会经济矛盾。韩国右翼保守主义的立场分为新教育运动和民主民族主义教育,但后者成为大韩民国的主导教育哲学。安浩相领导下的民主民族主义教育推行了一种极端民族主义议程,这种议程淹没了个人主义,有利于国家,但最终令此前负责监督教育改革的美国占领军官员感到失望。光复后的民主主义话语开启了民主主义发展的进化过程,这一进程贯穿了韩国近代史直到今天。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Teaching Democracy: The Discourse of Democracy and Education Reforms under the American Military Occupation of Korea, 1945–1948
Abstract:After Liberation in 1945, the concept of democracy was introduced to southern Korea through discursively contested representations formulated by the American occupation authorities and Koreans on the political left and right. One of the main fields of contestation was in education as the Americans and Koreans advanced their own interpretations of democratic education that addressed the relationship between the individual and the state. The American perspective on democratic education was grounded in the progressive ideals sweeping the United States. However, progressivism contained an inherent contradiction as it attempted the depoliticization of education while protecting colonial-era collaborators and enforcing anti-communism. The left-wing liberal Korean perspective challenged the social and economic contradictions inherited from the colonial period by critiquing bourgeois individualism in favor of a socially-oriented democratic education. The right-wing conservative Korean position was divided between the New Education movement and democratic nationalist education, but the latter emerged as the dominant education philosophy of the Republic of Korea. Democratic nationalist education under An Ho-sang pushed an ultra-nationalist agenda that submerged individualism in favor of the state but ultimately dismayed the American occupation officials who had previously overseen education reform. The discourse of democracy in the post-Liberation period initiated an evolutionary process of democratic development that has continued through modern Korean history up to the present day.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Koreana
Acta Koreana ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Transliteration of Korean Place Names in Colonial Times: Unveiling the Strategies of Japanese Imperialism (De)Bordering Korea: North Korea Represented in Liminal Space In Search of an Ideal Sijo (時調) Format in English: An Investigation of Kevin O’Rourke’s English Translations Kim Yongnang Reading Keats: An Intertextual Study of "Tugyon" (The cuckoo) and "Ode to a Nightingale" Embracing Filthy Tradition: Kim Suyong"s Postcolonial Enunciation in “Colossal Roots” and His Translation of Korea and Her Neighbours
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1