罗琳,《哈利波特迷》,以及为什么“管理危机的最佳方式是预防危机”:推特传播分析

IF 1.2 Q3 COMMUNICATION Communication Research and Practice Pub Date : 2023-05-11 DOI:10.1080/22041451.2023.2206327
Hannah Ravell
{"title":"罗琳,《哈利波特迷》,以及为什么“管理危机的最佳方式是预防危机”:推特传播分析","authors":"Hannah Ravell","doi":"10.1080/22041451.2023.2206327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Since 2007, celebrity author J.K. Rowling has disseminated retroactive reconstruction (retcon) statements via social media that seemingly seek to expand character diversity in her transmedial Wizarding World of the Harry Potter franchise. In response, fans have used Twitter to call out the difference between Rowling’s assertions of diversity and actual diversity they consider authoritative or ‘canon’. Thus, Rowling’s retcon statements, rather than enhancing her reputation and audience experiences, have instead created Public Relations (PR) challenges. Focusing on Rowling’s 2019 comments regarding Dumbledore and Grindelwald’s relationship in Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald and the PR crisis they precipitated on Twitter, Rowling’s communication strategies in response to the PR challenge of reputational damage done by her Twitter statements, are examined, especially through the lens of Coombs’ Situational Crisis Communication Theory.","PeriodicalId":10644,"journal":{"name":"Communication Research and Practice","volume":"23 1","pages":"237 - 254"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rowling, Potterheads and why ‘The best way to manage a crisis is to prevent one’: Twitter communication analysis\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Ravell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/22041451.2023.2206327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Since 2007, celebrity author J.K. Rowling has disseminated retroactive reconstruction (retcon) statements via social media that seemingly seek to expand character diversity in her transmedial Wizarding World of the Harry Potter franchise. In response, fans have used Twitter to call out the difference between Rowling’s assertions of diversity and actual diversity they consider authoritative or ‘canon’. Thus, Rowling’s retcon statements, rather than enhancing her reputation and audience experiences, have instead created Public Relations (PR) challenges. Focusing on Rowling’s 2019 comments regarding Dumbledore and Grindelwald’s relationship in Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald and the PR crisis they precipitated on Twitter, Rowling’s communication strategies in response to the PR challenge of reputational damage done by her Twitter statements, are examined, especially through the lens of Coombs’ Situational Crisis Communication Theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communication Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"237 - 254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communication Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2023.2206327\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2023.2206327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自2007年以来,著名作家j·k·罗琳通过社交媒体传播“回溯重建”(retcon)言论,似乎是为了扩大《哈利·波特》系列跨媒体魔法世界中的角色多样性。作为回应,粉丝们在推特上指出了罗琳主张的多样性与他们认为权威或“经典”的实际多样性之间的区别。因此,罗琳的反驳言论并没有提高她的声誉和观众体验,反而给公共关系带来了挑战。以罗琳2019年在《神奇动物:格林德沃之罪》中关于邓布利多和格林德沃关系的评论以及他们在推特上引发的公关危机为重点,通过库姆斯的情境危机传播理论,研究了罗琳在应对她的推特言论造成的声誉损害的公关挑战时的传播策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rowling, Potterheads and why ‘The best way to manage a crisis is to prevent one’: Twitter communication analysis
ABSTRACT Since 2007, celebrity author J.K. Rowling has disseminated retroactive reconstruction (retcon) statements via social media that seemingly seek to expand character diversity in her transmedial Wizarding World of the Harry Potter franchise. In response, fans have used Twitter to call out the difference between Rowling’s assertions of diversity and actual diversity they consider authoritative or ‘canon’. Thus, Rowling’s retcon statements, rather than enhancing her reputation and audience experiences, have instead created Public Relations (PR) challenges. Focusing on Rowling’s 2019 comments regarding Dumbledore and Grindelwald’s relationship in Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald and the PR crisis they precipitated on Twitter, Rowling’s communication strategies in response to the PR challenge of reputational damage done by her Twitter statements, are examined, especially through the lens of Coombs’ Situational Crisis Communication Theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Four provocations for rich digital ethnographic research situated in social media networks Devising an ethical ‘death knock’ model: the role of preparations, precursors, and professional identity in mitigating moral injury for journalists The demographics of digital disconnection: prevalence, motives and barriers to disconnecting from the Internet in Aotearoa New Zealand Stakeholder engagement and chaotic narrative spaces: Singapore’s COVID-19 outbreak in foreign-worker dormitories “We will not be lectured”: understanding political fandom on TikTok
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1