养老基金资产配置与参与人年龄:生命周期模型的检验

IF 2.2 3区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE European Journal of Finance Pub Date : 2009-08-24 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.1460586
J. Bikker, Dirk Broeders, D. Hollanders, Eduard H. M. Ponds
{"title":"养老基金资产配置与参与人年龄:生命周期模型的检验","authors":"J. Bikker, Dirk Broeders, D. Hollanders, Eduard H. M. Ponds","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1460586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the impact of participants’ age distribution on the asset allocation of Dutch pension funds, using a unique data set of pension fund investment plans for 2007. Theory predicts a negative effect of age on (strategic) equity exposures. We observe that pension funds do indeed take the average age of their participants into account. However, the average age of active participants has been incorporated much more strongly in investment behaviour than the average ages of retired or dormant participants. This suggests that both employers and employees, who dominate pension fund boards, tend to show more interest in active participants. A one-year higher average age in active participants leads to a significant and robust reduction in the strategic equity exposure by around 0.5 percentage point. Larger pension funds show a stronger age-equity exposure effect than smaller pension funds. This age-dependent asset allocation of pension funds aligns with the original life-cycle model by which young workers should invest more in equity than older workers because of their larger human capital. Other factors, viz. fund size, funding ratio, and average pension wealth of participants, influence equity exposure positively and significantly, in line with theory. Pension plan type and pension fund type have no significant impact.","PeriodicalId":47599,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Finance","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"83","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pension Funds’ Asset Allocation and Participant Age: A Test of the Life-Cycle Model\",\"authors\":\"J. Bikker, Dirk Broeders, D. Hollanders, Eduard H. M. Ponds\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1460586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the impact of participants’ age distribution on the asset allocation of Dutch pension funds, using a unique data set of pension fund investment plans for 2007. Theory predicts a negative effect of age on (strategic) equity exposures. We observe that pension funds do indeed take the average age of their participants into account. However, the average age of active participants has been incorporated much more strongly in investment behaviour than the average ages of retired or dormant participants. This suggests that both employers and employees, who dominate pension fund boards, tend to show more interest in active participants. A one-year higher average age in active participants leads to a significant and robust reduction in the strategic equity exposure by around 0.5 percentage point. Larger pension funds show a stronger age-equity exposure effect than smaller pension funds. This age-dependent asset allocation of pension funds aligns with the original life-cycle model by which young workers should invest more in equity than older workers because of their larger human capital. Other factors, viz. fund size, funding ratio, and average pension wealth of participants, influence equity exposure positively and significantly, in line with theory. Pension plan type and pension fund type have no significant impact.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Finance\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"83\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1460586\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1460586","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 83

摘要

本文利用2007年荷兰养老基金投资计划的独特数据集,考察了参与者年龄分布对荷兰养老基金资产配置的影响。理论预测年龄对(战略性)股权敞口有负向影响。我们观察到,养老基金确实考虑了参与者的平均年龄。然而,与退休或不活跃参与者的平均年龄相比,活跃参与者的平均年龄对投资行为的影响要大得多。这表明,主导养老基金董事会的雇主和雇员都倾向于对积极参与者表现出更大的兴趣。积极参与者的平均年龄增加一岁,会导致战略性股票敞口大幅减少约0.5个百分点。规模较大的养老基金比规模较小的养老基金表现出更强的年龄公平敞口效应。这种与年龄相关的养老基金资产配置符合最初的生命周期模型,即年轻员工应该比年长员工投资更多的股票,因为他们的人力资本更大。基金规模、出资比例、参与人平均养老金财富等其他因素对股票敞口的正向显著影响符合理论。养老金计划类型和养老金基金类型没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pension Funds’ Asset Allocation and Participant Age: A Test of the Life-Cycle Model
This paper examines the impact of participants’ age distribution on the asset allocation of Dutch pension funds, using a unique data set of pension fund investment plans for 2007. Theory predicts a negative effect of age on (strategic) equity exposures. We observe that pension funds do indeed take the average age of their participants into account. However, the average age of active participants has been incorporated much more strongly in investment behaviour than the average ages of retired or dormant participants. This suggests that both employers and employees, who dominate pension fund boards, tend to show more interest in active participants. A one-year higher average age in active participants leads to a significant and robust reduction in the strategic equity exposure by around 0.5 percentage point. Larger pension funds show a stronger age-equity exposure effect than smaller pension funds. This age-dependent asset allocation of pension funds aligns with the original life-cycle model by which young workers should invest more in equity than older workers because of their larger human capital. Other factors, viz. fund size, funding ratio, and average pension wealth of participants, influence equity exposure positively and significantly, in line with theory. Pension plan type and pension fund type have no significant impact.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Finance
European Journal of Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Finance publishes a full range of research into theoretical and empirical topics in finance. The emphasis is on issues that reflect European interests and concerns. The journal aims to publish work that is motivated by significant issues in the theory or practice of finance. The journal promotes communication between finance academics and practitioners by providing a vehicle for the publication of research into European issues, stimulating research in finance within Europe, encouraging the international exchange of ideas, theories and the practical application of methodologies and playing a positive role in the development of the infrastructure for finance research.
期刊最新文献
How does mutual fund flow respond to oil market volatility? Financial crime ‘hot spots’ – empirical evidence from the foreign exchange market Chinese capital markets Pricing Volatility Options Under Stochastic Skew with Application to the VIX Index Is value creation consistent with currency hedging?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1