平等与德语so…以及度与属性之间的关系

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY Journal of Biomedical Semantics Pub Date : 2020-11-25 DOI:10.1093/jos/ffaa011
Vera Hohaus, M. Zimmermann
{"title":"平等与德语so…以及度与属性之间的关系","authors":"Vera Hohaus, M. Zimmermann","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffaa011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We present a compositionally transparent, unified semantic analysis of two kinds of so…wie-equative constructions in German, namely degree equatives and property equatives in the domain of individuals or events. Unlike in English and many other European languages (Haspelmath & Buchholz 1998, Rett 2013), both equative types in German feature the parameter marker so, suggesting a unified analysis. We show that the parallel formal expression of German degree and property equatives is accompanied by a parallel syntactic distribution (in predicative, attributive, and adverbial position), and by identical semantic properties: Both equative types allow for scope ambiguities, show negative island effects out of context, and license the negative polarity item überhaupt ‘at all’ in the complement clause. As the same properties are also shared by German comparatives, we adopt the influential quantificational analysis of comparatives in von Stechow (1984ab), Heim (1985, 2001, 2007), and Beck (2011), and treat both German equative types in a uniform manner as expressing universal quantification over sets of degrees or over sets of properties (of individuals or events). Conceptually, the uniform marking of degree-related and property-related meanings is expected given that the abstract semantic category degree (type $d$) can be reconstructed in terms of equivalence classes, i.e., ontologically simpler sets of individuals (type $\\langle e,t\\rangle $) or events (type $\\langle v,t\\rangle $). These are found in any language, showing that whether or not a language makes explicit reference to degrees (by means of gradable adjectives, degree question words, degree-only equatives) does not follow on general conceptual or semantic grounds, but is determined by the grammar of that language.","PeriodicalId":15055,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Semantics","volume":"237 1","pages":"95-143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparisons of Equality With German so...wie, and the Relationship Between Degrees and Properties\",\"authors\":\"Vera Hohaus, M. Zimmermann\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jos/ffaa011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n We present a compositionally transparent, unified semantic analysis of two kinds of so…wie-equative constructions in German, namely degree equatives and property equatives in the domain of individuals or events. Unlike in English and many other European languages (Haspelmath & Buchholz 1998, Rett 2013), both equative types in German feature the parameter marker so, suggesting a unified analysis. We show that the parallel formal expression of German degree and property equatives is accompanied by a parallel syntactic distribution (in predicative, attributive, and adverbial position), and by identical semantic properties: Both equative types allow for scope ambiguities, show negative island effects out of context, and license the negative polarity item überhaupt ‘at all’ in the complement clause. As the same properties are also shared by German comparatives, we adopt the influential quantificational analysis of comparatives in von Stechow (1984ab), Heim (1985, 2001, 2007), and Beck (2011), and treat both German equative types in a uniform manner as expressing universal quantification over sets of degrees or over sets of properties (of individuals or events). Conceptually, the uniform marking of degree-related and property-related meanings is expected given that the abstract semantic category degree (type $d$) can be reconstructed in terms of equivalence classes, i.e., ontologically simpler sets of individuals (type $\\\\langle e,t\\\\rangle $) or events (type $\\\\langle v,t\\\\rangle $). These are found in any language, showing that whether or not a language makes explicit reference to degrees (by means of gradable adjectives, degree question words, degree-only equatives) does not follow on general conceptual or semantic grounds, but is determined by the grammar of that language.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomedical Semantics\",\"volume\":\"237 1\",\"pages\":\"95-143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomedical Semantics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffaa011\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffaa011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文对德语中两种程度等价和性质等价的构式在个体或事件领域进行了结构透明、统一的语义分析。与英语和许多其他欧洲语言不同(Haspelmath & Buchholz 1998, Rett 2013),德语中的两种等式类型都以参数标记so为特征,表明了统一的分析。我们表明,德语程度和性质等号的平行形式表达伴随着平行的句法分布(在谓语、定语和状语位置上)和相同的语义属性:两种等号类型都允许范围歧义,显示出上下文外的负面岛屿效应,并允许补语从句中的消极极性项 berhaupt“at all”。由于德语比较项也具有相同的性质,我们采用了von Stechow (1984ab)、Heim(1985,2001,2007)和Beck(2011)中对比较项的有影响力的定量分析,并以统一的方式将两种德语等价类型视为表示对程度集或对属性集(个人或事件)的普遍量化。从概念上讲,考虑到抽象语义范畴度(类型$d$)可以用等价类来重构,即在本体论上更简单的个体集(类型$\langle e,t\rangle $)或事件集(类型$\langle v,t\rangle $),期望度相关和属性相关意义的统一标记。这些在任何语言中都存在,这表明一种语言是否明确提及程度(通过可分级的形容词、程度疑问词、仅指代程度的等号)并不遵循一般的概念或语义基础,而是由该语言的语法决定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparisons of Equality With German so...wie, and the Relationship Between Degrees and Properties
We present a compositionally transparent, unified semantic analysis of two kinds of so…wie-equative constructions in German, namely degree equatives and property equatives in the domain of individuals or events. Unlike in English and many other European languages (Haspelmath & Buchholz 1998, Rett 2013), both equative types in German feature the parameter marker so, suggesting a unified analysis. We show that the parallel formal expression of German degree and property equatives is accompanied by a parallel syntactic distribution (in predicative, attributive, and adverbial position), and by identical semantic properties: Both equative types allow for scope ambiguities, show negative island effects out of context, and license the negative polarity item überhaupt ‘at all’ in the complement clause. As the same properties are also shared by German comparatives, we adopt the influential quantificational analysis of comparatives in von Stechow (1984ab), Heim (1985, 2001, 2007), and Beck (2011), and treat both German equative types in a uniform manner as expressing universal quantification over sets of degrees or over sets of properties (of individuals or events). Conceptually, the uniform marking of degree-related and property-related meanings is expected given that the abstract semantic category degree (type $d$) can be reconstructed in terms of equivalence classes, i.e., ontologically simpler sets of individuals (type $\langle e,t\rangle $) or events (type $\langle v,t\rangle $). These are found in any language, showing that whether or not a language makes explicit reference to degrees (by means of gradable adjectives, degree question words, degree-only equatives) does not follow on general conceptual or semantic grounds, but is determined by the grammar of that language.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biomedical Semantics
Journal of Biomedical Semantics MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
28
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Biomedical Semantics addresses issues of semantic enrichment and semantic processing in the biomedical domain. The scope of the journal covers two main areas: Infrastructure for biomedical semantics: focusing on semantic resources and repositories, meta-data management and resource description, knowledge representation and semantic frameworks, the Biomedical Semantic Web, and semantic interoperability. Semantic mining, annotation, and analysis: focusing on approaches and applications of semantic resources; and tools for investigation, reasoning, prediction, and discoveries in biomedicine.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Retrieval Augmented Generation of Ontologies using Artificial Intelligence (DRAGON-AI). MeSH2Matrix: combining MeSH keywords and machine learning for biomedical relation classification based on PubMed. Annotation of epilepsy clinic letters for natural language processing An extensible and unifying approach to retrospective clinical data modeling: the BrainTeaser Ontology. Concretizing plan specifications as realizables within the OBO foundry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1