COVID-19如何重新分配人类流动

IF 2.4 4区 历史学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Current History Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1525/curh.2022.121.838.304
B. Xiang
{"title":"COVID-19如何重新分配人类流动","authors":"B. Xiang","doi":"10.1525/curh.2022.121.838.304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pandemic has ushered in drastic new restrictions on the right to move, as governments have imposed lockdowns in more or less organized ways. In pursuit of its zero-COVID policy, China has gone farther than most in the extent and rigor of its mobility restrictions. Responsibility for enforcement has been redistributed to lower-level officials, landlords, and migrant labor agencies, while food delivery companies and others in the mobility business have thrived. These redistributions of mobility are likely to remain in place beyond the pandemic, changing relations between government and citizens.","PeriodicalId":45614,"journal":{"name":"Current History","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How COVID-19 Has Redistributed Human Mobility\",\"authors\":\"B. Xiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/curh.2022.121.838.304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The pandemic has ushered in drastic new restrictions on the right to move, as governments have imposed lockdowns in more or less organized ways. In pursuit of its zero-COVID policy, China has gone farther than most in the extent and rigor of its mobility restrictions. Responsibility for enforcement has been redistributed to lower-level officials, landlords, and migrant labor agencies, while food delivery companies and others in the mobility business have thrived. These redistributions of mobility are likely to remain in place beyond the pandemic, changing relations between government and citizens.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current History\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2022.121.838.304\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2022.121.838.304","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着各国政府或多或少地以有组织的方式实施封锁,疫情给行动权带来了严厉的新限制。为了实现零冠政策,中国在限制流动的范围和严格程度上比大多数国家都走得更远。执法的责任被重新分配给了下级官员、房东和外来务工人员中介机构,而外卖公司和其他移动行业的企业则蓬勃发展。这种流动性的重新分配很可能在大流行之后继续存在,从而改变政府与公民之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How COVID-19 Has Redistributed Human Mobility
The pandemic has ushered in drastic new restrictions on the right to move, as governments have imposed lockdowns in more or less organized ways. In pursuit of its zero-COVID policy, China has gone farther than most in the extent and rigor of its mobility restrictions. Responsibility for enforcement has been redistributed to lower-level officials, landlords, and migrant labor agencies, while food delivery companies and others in the mobility business have thrived. These redistributions of mobility are likely to remain in place beyond the pandemic, changing relations between government and citizens.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current History
Current History Multiple-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Current History enjoys a unique place among America"s most distinguished periodicals.The oldest US publication devoted exclusively to world affairs, Current History was founded by The New York Times in 1914 to provide detailed coverage of what was then known as the Great War. As a privately owned publication, Current History has continued a long tradition of groundbreaking coverage, providing a forum for leading scholars and specialists to analyze events and trends in every region of a rapidly changing world.
期刊最新文献
An Aging World Relies on Migrant Care Workers Transitional Justice at 40 Will AI Slay the Poverty Dragon? The Return of Inflation The Climate Risk of Green Industrial Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1