空客与波音巨型客机之争:抢占失败案例

delete Pub Date : 2002-02-01 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.302452
B. Esty, P. Ghemawat
{"title":"空客与波音巨型客机之争:抢占失败案例","authors":"B. Esty, P. Ghemawat","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.302452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper looks at competitive interactions between Airbus and Boeing in very large aircraft. It concludes that Boeing attempted to preempt Airbus in introducing a new product in this space but failed to do so because of the incredibility, given the assumption of value maximization, of self-cannibalization. A theoretical model is used to illustrate this credibility constraint, and an assortment of evidence-involving pro forma financial valuations, product market data (on prices and quantities), capital market reactions to key events, and qualitative information on Boeing's organizational structure and recent changes to it-is assembled to support the hypothesis that the constraint on self-cannibalization ultimately proved decisive.","PeriodicalId":11044,"journal":{"name":"delete","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Airbus vs. Boeing in Superjumbos: A Case of Failed Preemption\",\"authors\":\"B. Esty, P. Ghemawat\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.302452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper looks at competitive interactions between Airbus and Boeing in very large aircraft. It concludes that Boeing attempted to preempt Airbus in introducing a new product in this space but failed to do so because of the incredibility, given the assumption of value maximization, of self-cannibalization. A theoretical model is used to illustrate this credibility constraint, and an assortment of evidence-involving pro forma financial valuations, product market data (on prices and quantities), capital market reactions to key events, and qualitative information on Boeing's organizational structure and recent changes to it-is assembled to support the hypothesis that the constraint on self-cannibalization ultimately proved decisive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"delete\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"delete\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.302452\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"delete","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.302452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

本文着眼于空客和波音在超大型飞机上的竞争互动。它的结论是,波音试图在这一领域抢占空客的先机,推出新产品,但未能成功,因为考虑到价值最大化的假设,自我蚕食是不可思议的。一个理论模型被用来说明这种可信度约束,以及各种各样的证据——包括预估财务估值、产品市场数据(价格和数量)、资本市场对关键事件的反应,以及波音公司组织结构和最近变化的定性信息——被集合起来支持这样的假设,即自我竞争的约束最终被证明是决定性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Airbus vs. Boeing in Superjumbos: A Case of Failed Preemption
This paper looks at competitive interactions between Airbus and Boeing in very large aircraft. It concludes that Boeing attempted to preempt Airbus in introducing a new product in this space but failed to do so because of the incredibility, given the assumption of value maximization, of self-cannibalization. A theoretical model is used to illustrate this credibility constraint, and an assortment of evidence-involving pro forma financial valuations, product market data (on prices and quantities), capital market reactions to key events, and qualitative information on Boeing's organizational structure and recent changes to it-is assembled to support the hypothesis that the constraint on self-cannibalization ultimately proved decisive.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Balanced Votes Method: A new perspective on symmetry in creating fair redistricting plans and measuring gerrymandering An in Vitro Study to Evaluate and Compare the Remineralizing Potential among Casein Phosphopeptide-Amorphous Calcium Phosphate (CPP-ACP) with Fluoride and Surface Pre-Reacted Glass (S-PRG) Fillers Using Quantitative Analysis. Sport Sponsorship Announcement and Stock Returns: A Meta-Analytic Review How Shifting from In-Person to Virtual-Only Shareholder Meetings Affects Shareholders’ Voice Did Everything Change After 911? Not Everything!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1