{"title":"HER2 RNA表达水平(QRT-PCR)与蛋白表达水平(免疫组化)的比较,探讨HER2表达水平与临床病理特征的关系","authors":"Samira Shabani, Tayebeh Majidi Zadeh, Ameneh Tavakoli Koudehi, Frouz, E. Mahjoubi","doi":"10.35248/2157-2518.21.S18.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Evaluation HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) status is considered as a standard practice in breast cancer clinical management. There are different methods for evaluation HER2 status, but currently the routine method for assessment of HER2 status is Immunohistochemistry (IHC) .The aim of the this study was to compare the results obtained by IHC and Quantitative Real Time PCR methods in determination of HER2 status to specify whether QRT- PCR can use as supplementary method in breast cancer or not. Methods: In this regard, 48 fresh tissues from patients with breast tumor were studied. IHC, qRT- PCR technique was done in every speciman. IHC was done with DAKO HercepTest and QRT- PCR method was performed with TaqMan probes and primers in lightcyclerTMsystem (Corbett Real Time Thermal cycler). Results: No Correlations was seen between relative HER2 mRNA expression and IHC HER2 status. Furthermore, the relation between HER2 expression level and patient's age, tumor size, lymph node involvement and tumor grade was not significant. Conclusion: The present results show that the relative mRNA levels of HER2 by using q RT-PCR cannot discriminate between HER2 IHC positive from negative","PeriodicalId":15209,"journal":{"name":"Journal of carcinogenesis & mutagenesis","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison RNA Expression Level of HER2 (By QRT-PCR) With Protein Expression Level (Immunohistochemistry) and Investigation HER 2 Expression Level with Clinicopathological Features\",\"authors\":\"Samira Shabani, Tayebeh Majidi Zadeh, Ameneh Tavakoli Koudehi, Frouz, E. Mahjoubi\",\"doi\":\"10.35248/2157-2518.21.S18.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Evaluation HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) status is considered as a standard practice in breast cancer clinical management. There are different methods for evaluation HER2 status, but currently the routine method for assessment of HER2 status is Immunohistochemistry (IHC) .The aim of the this study was to compare the results obtained by IHC and Quantitative Real Time PCR methods in determination of HER2 status to specify whether QRT- PCR can use as supplementary method in breast cancer or not. Methods: In this regard, 48 fresh tissues from patients with breast tumor were studied. IHC, qRT- PCR technique was done in every speciman. IHC was done with DAKO HercepTest and QRT- PCR method was performed with TaqMan probes and primers in lightcyclerTMsystem (Corbett Real Time Thermal cycler). Results: No Correlations was seen between relative HER2 mRNA expression and IHC HER2 status. Furthermore, the relation between HER2 expression level and patient's age, tumor size, lymph node involvement and tumor grade was not significant. Conclusion: The present results show that the relative mRNA levels of HER2 by using q RT-PCR cannot discriminate between HER2 IHC positive from negative\",\"PeriodicalId\":15209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of carcinogenesis & mutagenesis\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of carcinogenesis & mutagenesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35248/2157-2518.21.S18.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of carcinogenesis & mutagenesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2157-2518.21.S18.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:评估HER2(人表皮生长因子受体2)状态被认为是乳腺癌临床管理的标准做法。评估HER2状态的方法有很多,目前评估HER2状态的常规方法是免疫组化(Immunohistochemistry, IHC)。本研究的目的是比较免疫组化(Immunohistochemistry, IHC)和实时荧光定量PCR (Quantitative Real Time PCR)检测HER2状态的结果,以明确QRT- PCR是否可以作为乳腺癌检测的辅助方法。方法:对48例乳腺肿瘤患者的新鲜组织进行研究。每个标本均采用免疫组化、qRT- PCR技术。采用DAKO HercepTest进行免疫组化,在lightcyclertm系统(Corbett Real Time Thermal cycler)中使用TaqMan探针和引物进行QRT- PCR检测。结果:HER2 mRNA相对表达量与IHC HER2状态无相关性。此外,HER2表达水平与患者年龄、肿瘤大小、淋巴结受累程度和肿瘤分级之间无显著相关性。结论:目前的结果表明,利用q - RT-PCR检测的HER2相对mRNA水平不能区分HER2 IHC阳性和阴性
Comparison RNA Expression Level of HER2 (By QRT-PCR) With Protein Expression Level (Immunohistochemistry) and Investigation HER 2 Expression Level with Clinicopathological Features
Background: Evaluation HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) status is considered as a standard practice in breast cancer clinical management. There are different methods for evaluation HER2 status, but currently the routine method for assessment of HER2 status is Immunohistochemistry (IHC) .The aim of the this study was to compare the results obtained by IHC and Quantitative Real Time PCR methods in determination of HER2 status to specify whether QRT- PCR can use as supplementary method in breast cancer or not. Methods: In this regard, 48 fresh tissues from patients with breast tumor were studied. IHC, qRT- PCR technique was done in every speciman. IHC was done with DAKO HercepTest and QRT- PCR method was performed with TaqMan probes and primers in lightcyclerTMsystem (Corbett Real Time Thermal cycler). Results: No Correlations was seen between relative HER2 mRNA expression and IHC HER2 status. Furthermore, the relation between HER2 expression level and patient's age, tumor size, lymph node involvement and tumor grade was not significant. Conclusion: The present results show that the relative mRNA levels of HER2 by using q RT-PCR cannot discriminate between HER2 IHC positive from negative