通过RDA模型理解电子书平台期

Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Library Metadata Pub Date : 2017-01-02 DOI:10.1080/19386389.2017.1285140
S. Bernstein
{"title":"通过RDA模型理解电子书平台期","authors":"S. Bernstein","doi":"10.1080/19386389.2017.1285140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The introduction of Amazon's Kindle eReader in 2007 and of Barnes & Noble's Nook eReader in 2010 brought with them an excitement for e-books and a sudden increase in user adoption of the format. In less than a decade's time, however, enthusiasm for e-books quickly leveled off. This article examines e-books as a format in comparison with other resource formats through the lens of the Resource Description and Access content standard as a way to better understand the resilience to supersession that print has displayed in the face of e-books.","PeriodicalId":39057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Library Metadata","volume":"9 1","pages":"1 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the E-Book Plateau Through the RDA Model\",\"authors\":\"S. Bernstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19386389.2017.1285140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The introduction of Amazon's Kindle eReader in 2007 and of Barnes & Noble's Nook eReader in 2010 brought with them an excitement for e-books and a sudden increase in user adoption of the format. In less than a decade's time, however, enthusiasm for e-books quickly leveled off. This article examines e-books as a format in comparison with other resource formats through the lens of the Resource Description and Access content standard as a way to better understand the resilience to supersession that print has displayed in the face of e-books.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Library Metadata\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Library Metadata\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2017.1285140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Library Metadata","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2017.1285140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2007年亚马逊的Kindle电子书阅读器和2010年巴诺的Nook电子书阅读器的推出,带来了人们对电子书的兴奋,用户对电子书格式的采用也突然增加。然而,在不到十年的时间里,人们对电子书的热情迅速趋于平稳。本文通过资源描述和访问内容标准的视角,将电子书作为一种格式与其他资源格式进行比较,以更好地理解印刷版在面对电子书时所表现出的抗替代能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding the E-Book Plateau Through the RDA Model
ABSTRACT The introduction of Amazon's Kindle eReader in 2007 and of Barnes & Noble's Nook eReader in 2010 brought with them an excitement for e-books and a sudden increase in user adoption of the format. In less than a decade's time, however, enthusiasm for e-books quickly leveled off. This article examines e-books as a format in comparison with other resource formats through the lens of the Resource Description and Access content standard as a way to better understand the resilience to supersession that print has displayed in the face of e-books.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Library Metadata
Journal of Library Metadata Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Metadata Management in Data Lake Environments: A Survey A Minimal Metadata Schema and Its Tool to Improve the Searchableness of Research Data in Bioinformatics Changes in Digital Collections and Their Metadata: A Longitudinal Study of UIUC Digital Library Common Metadata Framework for Research Data Repository: Necessity to Support Open Science Entity Management Using RDA and Wikibase: A Case Study at the National Library of Greece
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1