几种示踪生产测井技术在一口井中的应用效果比较

S. Arefyev, V. Makienko, Dmitry Shestakov, M. Galiev, K. Ovchinnikov, E. Malyavko, Igor Novikov
{"title":"几种示踪生产测井技术在一口井中的应用效果比较","authors":"S. Arefyev, V. Makienko, Dmitry Shestakov, M. Galiev, K. Ovchinnikov, E. Malyavko, Igor Novikov","doi":"10.2118/196829-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In recent years, oil and gas producing companies have increasingly migrated towards using tracer-based methods to obtain data on horizontal wells operation. The interest in these technologies is largely due to their ability to obtain data over a long period of time with a radical decrease in the required resources, thereby providing new opportunities for well management and increasing cumulative production. The aim of this article is to compare the results of applying different tracer-based systems in one well.\n Tracer-based technologies produced by different manufacturers vary in physical principles of operation, as well as in the methods of their injection into the well or reservoir. Tracers designed for long-term work are injected into the reservoir with marked proppant or lowered into the wells in the lower completion cassettes. For the first time, alternative tracer-based systems were applied in one well, ensuring the selectivity of work with oil and water. This allowed us to compare the results and evaluate the technology's advantages and disadvantages. The well was completed by multi-stage hydraulic fracturing with the possibility of subsequent port control using coiled tubing. Each of five well intervals were equipped with two tracer cartridges fixed on an MFrac sleeve on both sides. In addition, proppant with markers was pumped in 3 months. The unique signature of the marker was used for each fracturing stage (5 unique signatures for each of 5 fracturing stages).\n As a result of this world-first field application of alternative tracer-based systems, valuable analytical material was obtained related to the quantitative analysis of various tracers, the performance of different polymers, and the stability of the tracers’ allocation in the formation fluid. The data obtained confirmed the character of the marked proppant pack washing out with the formation fluid in comparison with the tracer casings attached to MFrac port on both sides.\n The following results were achieved upon completion: additional tools were obtained for the correlation of data on the tracers amount and concentration, and comparative indicators of different tracer technologies in terms of efficiency and work accuracy were identified. It was also confirmed that the marked proppant is not washed out into the well under these reservoir conditions. The authors of this article were the first to compare the technologies with different approaches to the tracers’ placement in a well within one project. Based on the project results, the obtained data allowed us to answer many pressing questions from oil and gas producing companies related to the comparison of tracer systems.","PeriodicalId":10977,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, October 23, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Various Tracer-Based Production Logging Technologies Application Results in One Well\",\"authors\":\"S. Arefyev, V. Makienko, Dmitry Shestakov, M. Galiev, K. Ovchinnikov, E. Malyavko, Igor Novikov\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/196829-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In recent years, oil and gas producing companies have increasingly migrated towards using tracer-based methods to obtain data on horizontal wells operation. The interest in these technologies is largely due to their ability to obtain data over a long period of time with a radical decrease in the required resources, thereby providing new opportunities for well management and increasing cumulative production. The aim of this article is to compare the results of applying different tracer-based systems in one well.\\n Tracer-based technologies produced by different manufacturers vary in physical principles of operation, as well as in the methods of their injection into the well or reservoir. Tracers designed for long-term work are injected into the reservoir with marked proppant or lowered into the wells in the lower completion cassettes. For the first time, alternative tracer-based systems were applied in one well, ensuring the selectivity of work with oil and water. This allowed us to compare the results and evaluate the technology's advantages and disadvantages. The well was completed by multi-stage hydraulic fracturing with the possibility of subsequent port control using coiled tubing. Each of five well intervals were equipped with two tracer cartridges fixed on an MFrac sleeve on both sides. In addition, proppant with markers was pumped in 3 months. The unique signature of the marker was used for each fracturing stage (5 unique signatures for each of 5 fracturing stages).\\n As a result of this world-first field application of alternative tracer-based systems, valuable analytical material was obtained related to the quantitative analysis of various tracers, the performance of different polymers, and the stability of the tracers’ allocation in the formation fluid. The data obtained confirmed the character of the marked proppant pack washing out with the formation fluid in comparison with the tracer casings attached to MFrac port on both sides.\\n The following results were achieved upon completion: additional tools were obtained for the correlation of data on the tracers amount and concentration, and comparative indicators of different tracer technologies in terms of efficiency and work accuracy were identified. It was also confirmed that the marked proppant is not washed out into the well under these reservoir conditions. The authors of this article were the first to compare the technologies with different approaches to the tracers’ placement in a well within one project. Based on the project results, the obtained data allowed us to answer many pressing questions from oil and gas producing companies related to the comparison of tracer systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Wed, October 23, 2019\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Wed, October 23, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/196829-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, October 23, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/196829-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

近年来,油气生产公司越来越倾向于使用基于示踪剂的方法来获取水平井作业数据。对这些技术的兴趣主要是由于它们能够在较长时间内获得数据,而所需资源却大大减少,从而为井管理和增加累积产量提供了新的机会。本文的目的是比较在一口井中应用不同示踪剂系统的结果。不同制造商生产的基于示踪剂的技术在物理操作原理以及注入井或储层的方法上各不相同。为长期工作而设计的示踪剂与支撑剂一起注入到储层中,或者在下部完井盒中下放到井中。这是第一次在一口井中应用替代示踪剂系统,确保了油水作业的选择性。这使我们能够比较结果并评估该技术的优点和缺点。该井通过多级水力压裂完成,随后可能使用连续油管进行端口控制。5个井段中的每一个井段都配备了两个示踪剂套管,固定在MFrac滑套的两侧。此外,在3个月内泵送带有标记物的支撑剂。每个压裂段都使用了独特的标记(5个压裂段中的每一个都有5个独特的标记)。作为世界上第一个基于替代示踪剂系统的现场应用,获得了与各种示踪剂的定量分析、不同聚合物的性能以及示踪剂在地层流体中的分配稳定性相关的有价值的分析材料。与MFrac端口两侧的示踪剂套管相比,所获得的数据证实了支撑剂充填层被地层流体冲刷的特征。完成后获得以下结果:获得了用于示踪剂数量和浓度数据关联的额外工具,并确定了不同示踪剂技术在效率和工作精度方面的比较指标。研究还证实,在这些储层条件下,标记的支撑剂不会被冲入井中。本文的作者首先比较了在同一个项目中,不同示踪剂放置方法的技术。根据项目结果,获得的数据使我们能够回答油气生产公司关于示踪剂系统比较的许多紧迫问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Various Tracer-Based Production Logging Technologies Application Results in One Well
In recent years, oil and gas producing companies have increasingly migrated towards using tracer-based methods to obtain data on horizontal wells operation. The interest in these technologies is largely due to their ability to obtain data over a long period of time with a radical decrease in the required resources, thereby providing new opportunities for well management and increasing cumulative production. The aim of this article is to compare the results of applying different tracer-based systems in one well. Tracer-based technologies produced by different manufacturers vary in physical principles of operation, as well as in the methods of their injection into the well or reservoir. Tracers designed for long-term work are injected into the reservoir with marked proppant or lowered into the wells in the lower completion cassettes. For the first time, alternative tracer-based systems were applied in one well, ensuring the selectivity of work with oil and water. This allowed us to compare the results and evaluate the technology's advantages and disadvantages. The well was completed by multi-stage hydraulic fracturing with the possibility of subsequent port control using coiled tubing. Each of five well intervals were equipped with two tracer cartridges fixed on an MFrac sleeve on both sides. In addition, proppant with markers was pumped in 3 months. The unique signature of the marker was used for each fracturing stage (5 unique signatures for each of 5 fracturing stages). As a result of this world-first field application of alternative tracer-based systems, valuable analytical material was obtained related to the quantitative analysis of various tracers, the performance of different polymers, and the stability of the tracers’ allocation in the formation fluid. The data obtained confirmed the character of the marked proppant pack washing out with the formation fluid in comparison with the tracer casings attached to MFrac port on both sides. The following results were achieved upon completion: additional tools were obtained for the correlation of data on the tracers amount and concentration, and comparative indicators of different tracer technologies in terms of efficiency and work accuracy were identified. It was also confirmed that the marked proppant is not washed out into the well under these reservoir conditions. The authors of this article were the first to compare the technologies with different approaches to the tracers’ placement in a well within one project. Based on the project results, the obtained data allowed us to answer many pressing questions from oil and gas producing companies related to the comparison of tracer systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Practical Application of the Fluorescent Microspheres Method Technology in Horizontal Wells of the Upper Salym Oil Field: Efficiency of the Method, Technology and Approach Evolution of Horizontal Wells Production Logging Using Markers Successful Implementation of Managed Pressure Drilling Technology Under the Conditions of Catastrophic Mud Losses in the Kuyumbinskoe Field Completion Design Optimization for Unconventional Wells Using Large Scale Computational Science Assessing Efficiency of Multiwell Retrospective Testing MRT in Analysis of Cross-Well Interference and Prediction of Formation and Bottom- Hole Pressure Dynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1