Ji-Hyeon Bae, Gang-Ho Bae, Taeseok Park, Jung-Bo Huh, Jae-Won Choi
{"title":"对比氧化锆和树脂水泥不同表面处理方式的抗剪粘结强度","authors":"Ji-Hyeon Bae, Gang-Ho Bae, Taeseok Park, Jung-Bo Huh, Jae-Won Choi","doi":"10.4047/JKAP.2021.59.2.153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of four surface treatment methods to improve zirconia roughness and three types of resin cement on the shear bond strength (SBS). Materials and methods: A total of 120 zirconia blocks were randomly divided into four surface treatments: non-treatment (Control), airborne-particle abrasion (APA) with 50 μm Al 2 O 3 (APA50), APA with 125 μm Al 2 O 3 (APA125), and ZrO 2 slurry (ZA). Three resin cements (Panavia F 2.0, Superbond C&B, and Variolink N) were applied to the surface-treated zirconia specimens. All specimens were subjected to SBS testing using a universal testing machine. The surface of the representative specimens of each group was observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). SBS data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA test and post-hoc Tukey HSD Test (α=.05). Results: In the surface treatment method, APA125, APA50, ZA, and Control showed high shear bond strength in order, but there was no significant difference between APA125 and APA50 (P>.05). Also, ZA showed significantly higher shear bond strength than Control (P<.05). In the resin cement type, Panavia F 2.0, Superbond C&B, and Variolink N showed significantly higher shear bond strength in order (P<.05). In SEM images, the zirconia surfaces of the APA50 and APA125 showed quite rough and irregular shapes, and the zirconia surface of the ZA was observed small irregular porosity and rough surfaces. Conclusion: APA and ZrO 2 slurry were enhanced the surface roughness of zirconia, and Panavia F 2.0 containing MDP showed the highest shear bond strength with zirconia. (J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2021;59:153-63)","PeriodicalId":22653,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of shear bond strength according to various surface treatment methods of zirconia and resin cement types\",\"authors\":\"Ji-Hyeon Bae, Gang-Ho Bae, Taeseok Park, Jung-Bo Huh, Jae-Won Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.4047/JKAP.2021.59.2.153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of four surface treatment methods to improve zirconia roughness and three types of resin cement on the shear bond strength (SBS). Materials and methods: A total of 120 zirconia blocks were randomly divided into four surface treatments: non-treatment (Control), airborne-particle abrasion (APA) with 50 μm Al 2 O 3 (APA50), APA with 125 μm Al 2 O 3 (APA125), and ZrO 2 slurry (ZA). Three resin cements (Panavia F 2.0, Superbond C&B, and Variolink N) were applied to the surface-treated zirconia specimens. All specimens were subjected to SBS testing using a universal testing machine. The surface of the representative specimens of each group was observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). SBS data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA test and post-hoc Tukey HSD Test (α=.05). Results: In the surface treatment method, APA125, APA50, ZA, and Control showed high shear bond strength in order, but there was no significant difference between APA125 and APA50 (P>.05). Also, ZA showed significantly higher shear bond strength than Control (P<.05). In the resin cement type, Panavia F 2.0, Superbond C&B, and Variolink N showed significantly higher shear bond strength in order (P<.05). In SEM images, the zirconia surfaces of the APA50 and APA125 showed quite rough and irregular shapes, and the zirconia surface of the ZA was observed small irregular porosity and rough surfaces. Conclusion: APA and ZrO 2 slurry were enhanced the surface roughness of zirconia, and Panavia F 2.0 containing MDP showed the highest shear bond strength with zirconia. (J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2021;59:153-63)\",\"PeriodicalId\":22653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4047/JKAP.2021.59.2.153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4047/JKAP.2021.59.2.153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评价四种改善氧化锆粗糙度的表面处理方法和三种树脂水泥对抗剪粘结强度(SBS)的影响。材料与方法:将120个氧化锆块随机分为四种表面处理:未处理(Control)、50 μm Al 2o3 (APA50)气相颗粒磨损(APA)、125 μm Al 2o3 (APA125)气相颗粒磨损(APA)和ZrO 2浆料(ZA)。三种树脂胶结剂(Panavia F 2.0, Superbond C&B和Variolink N)应用于表面处理的氧化锆样品。所有试样均采用万能试验机进行SBS试验。采用扫描电镜(SEM)观察各组代表性标本的表面形貌。SBS资料采用单因素方差分析、双因素方差分析和事后Tukey HSD检验(α= 0.05)。结果:在表面处理方法中,ap125、ap50、ZA、Control的剪切结合强度依次较高,但ap125与ap50之间无显著性差异(P < 0.05)。ZA的剪切粘接强度显著高于对照组(P< 0.05)。在树脂水泥类型中,Panavia f2.0、Superbond C&B和Variolink N的剪切强度依次显著高于Panavia f2.0、Superbond C&B和Variolink N (P< 0.05)。在SEM图像中,APA50和APA125的氧化锆表面显示出相当粗糙和不规则的形状,ZA的氧化锆表面观察到小的不规则孔隙和粗糙的表面。结论:APA和zro2浆料均能增强氧化锆的表面粗糙度,其中含有MDP的Panavia f2.0与氧化锆的剪切结合强度最高。(韩国口腔医学学报2021;59:153-63)
Comparison of shear bond strength according to various surface treatment methods of zirconia and resin cement types
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of four surface treatment methods to improve zirconia roughness and three types of resin cement on the shear bond strength (SBS). Materials and methods: A total of 120 zirconia blocks were randomly divided into four surface treatments: non-treatment (Control), airborne-particle abrasion (APA) with 50 μm Al 2 O 3 (APA50), APA with 125 μm Al 2 O 3 (APA125), and ZrO 2 slurry (ZA). Three resin cements (Panavia F 2.0, Superbond C&B, and Variolink N) were applied to the surface-treated zirconia specimens. All specimens were subjected to SBS testing using a universal testing machine. The surface of the representative specimens of each group was observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). SBS data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA test and post-hoc Tukey HSD Test (α=.05). Results: In the surface treatment method, APA125, APA50, ZA, and Control showed high shear bond strength in order, but there was no significant difference between APA125 and APA50 (P>.05). Also, ZA showed significantly higher shear bond strength than Control (P<.05). In the resin cement type, Panavia F 2.0, Superbond C&B, and Variolink N showed significantly higher shear bond strength in order (P<.05). In SEM images, the zirconia surfaces of the APA50 and APA125 showed quite rough and irregular shapes, and the zirconia surface of the ZA was observed small irregular porosity and rough surfaces. Conclusion: APA and ZrO 2 slurry were enhanced the surface roughness of zirconia, and Panavia F 2.0 containing MDP showed the highest shear bond strength with zirconia. (J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2021;59:153-63)