编者简介:《死者的宝藏:从新石器时代乌拉尔到斯基泰人、早期波罗的海人和金帐汗国的墓葬和作坊》

Q3 Arts and Humanities Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia Pub Date : 2015-04-03 DOI:10.1080/10611959.2015.1160198
M. Balzer
{"title":"编者简介:《死者的宝藏:从新石器时代乌拉尔到斯基泰人、早期波罗的海人和金帐汗国的墓葬和作坊》","authors":"M. Balzer","doi":"10.1080/10611959.2015.1160198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Treasures for archeologists represent far more than gold objects found in a grave, for the true treasure is usually an addition to extensive knowledge bases accumulated over years of painstaking digging in calculated sites, felicitous accidental finds, and diligent museum exponent research. The new, cutting-edge articles in this issue present “treasures” in multiple senses—discussing precious finds and placing them in new or adapted interpretive contexts. Chronologically their range and depth is considerable, since the territory of the former Soviet Union, today’s Eurasia, continues to yield diverse riches that span the Neolithic to the Bronze and Iron Ages in the articles represented here. As usual for Eurasia archeology, these articles continue important themes in the literature, such as exploring how one determines a “people” or a “culture area,” understanding Scythian art, expanding the range of the Golden Horde, and interpreting interrelationships between nomadic and settled peoples in various time periods. Our lead article, by Aleksandr F. Shorin, Evgenii V. Vilisov, and Anastasiia A. Shorina, plunges us into the Late Neolithic, through an archeological complex beyond the Ural Mountains that raises important questions about how archeologists and anthropologists can designate a “people” and a “cultural complex” with mostly ceramic shards to go on, and only fragmentary evidence of dwellings, burial rites, or artifacts that might correlate to specific “cult” practices. One puzzle the authors","PeriodicalId":35495,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editor's Introduction: Treasures of the Dead: Burials and Workshops from the Neolithic Urals to the Scythians, Early Balts, and the Golden Horde\",\"authors\":\"M. Balzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10611959.2015.1160198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Treasures for archeologists represent far more than gold objects found in a grave, for the true treasure is usually an addition to extensive knowledge bases accumulated over years of painstaking digging in calculated sites, felicitous accidental finds, and diligent museum exponent research. The new, cutting-edge articles in this issue present “treasures” in multiple senses—discussing precious finds and placing them in new or adapted interpretive contexts. Chronologically their range and depth is considerable, since the territory of the former Soviet Union, today’s Eurasia, continues to yield diverse riches that span the Neolithic to the Bronze and Iron Ages in the articles represented here. As usual for Eurasia archeology, these articles continue important themes in the literature, such as exploring how one determines a “people” or a “culture area,” understanding Scythian art, expanding the range of the Golden Horde, and interpreting interrelationships between nomadic and settled peoples in various time periods. Our lead article, by Aleksandr F. Shorin, Evgenii V. Vilisov, and Anastasiia A. Shorina, plunges us into the Late Neolithic, through an archeological complex beyond the Ural Mountains that raises important questions about how archeologists and anthropologists can designate a “people” and a “cultural complex” with mostly ceramic shards to go on, and only fragmentary evidence of dwellings, burial rites, or artifacts that might correlate to specific “cult” practices. One puzzle the authors\",\"PeriodicalId\":35495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2015.1160198\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2015.1160198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对考古学家来说,宝藏远比在坟墓里发现的金器更有意义,因为真正的宝藏通常是对多年来在精心计算的地点进行艰苦挖掘、偶然发现和勤奋的博物馆研究所积累的广泛知识基础的补充。本期最新的前沿文章呈现了多重意义上的“宝藏”——讨论珍贵的发现,并将它们置于新的或适应的解释语境中。从年代上看,它们的范围和深度是相当大的,因为前苏联的领土,今天的欧亚大陆,继续产生从新石器时代到青铜和铁器时代的各种财富。与欧亚大陆考古学一样,这些文章继续了文献中的重要主题,例如探索如何确定“民族”或“文化区域”,理解斯基泰艺术,扩大金帐汗国的范围,以及解释不同时期游牧民族和定居民族之间的相互关系。我们的第一篇文章由亚历山大·f·肖林、叶夫根尼·v·维索夫和阿纳斯塔西娅·a·肖丽娜撰写,通过乌拉尔山脉之外的一个考古建筑群,将我们带入新石器时代晚期,这引发了一个重要的问题:考古学家和人类学家如何能够用大部分陶瓷碎片来指定一个“民族”和一个“文化综合体”,只有零碎的住所、葬礼或可能与特定“邪教”活动相关的人工制品的证据。让作者困惑的是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Editor's Introduction: Treasures of the Dead: Burials and Workshops from the Neolithic Urals to the Scythians, Early Balts, and the Golden Horde
Treasures for archeologists represent far more than gold objects found in a grave, for the true treasure is usually an addition to extensive knowledge bases accumulated over years of painstaking digging in calculated sites, felicitous accidental finds, and diligent museum exponent research. The new, cutting-edge articles in this issue present “treasures” in multiple senses—discussing precious finds and placing them in new or adapted interpretive contexts. Chronologically their range and depth is considerable, since the territory of the former Soviet Union, today’s Eurasia, continues to yield diverse riches that span the Neolithic to the Bronze and Iron Ages in the articles represented here. As usual for Eurasia archeology, these articles continue important themes in the literature, such as exploring how one determines a “people” or a “culture area,” understanding Scythian art, expanding the range of the Golden Horde, and interpreting interrelationships between nomadic and settled peoples in various time periods. Our lead article, by Aleksandr F. Shorin, Evgenii V. Vilisov, and Anastasiia A. Shorina, plunges us into the Late Neolithic, through an archeological complex beyond the Ural Mountains that raises important questions about how archeologists and anthropologists can designate a “people” and a “cultural complex” with mostly ceramic shards to go on, and only fragmentary evidence of dwellings, burial rites, or artifacts that might correlate to specific “cult” practices. One puzzle the authors
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia
Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia Arts and Humanities-History
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia presents scholarship from Russia, Siberia, the Caucasus, and Central Asia, the vast region that stretches from the Baltic to the Black Sea and from Lake Baikal to the Bering Strait. Each thematic issue, with a substantive introduction to the topic by the editor, features expertly translated and annotated manuscripts, articles, and book excerpts reporting fieldwork from every part of the region and theoretical studies on topics of special interest.
期刊最新文献
Dialogues with the Cold: Natural Low Temperatures in the Everyday Life of Rural Residents of Yakutia (Sakha Republic) in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries Introduction: Ecology Lessons: Community Solidarity, Indigenous Knowledge, Civic Society in Crisis Fire and Water: Indigenous Ecological Knowledge and Climate Challenges in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Manipulations of Public Consciousness in the Environmental Conflict on Kushtau On Defining and Registering the Indigenous Peoples of The North, Siberia and the Far East: Legal Process Documentation and Ramifications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1