将行为人悔罪作为减刑情节考虑的可能性

E.V. Shimanovich
{"title":"将行为人悔罪作为减刑情节考虑的可能性","authors":"E.V. Shimanovich","doi":"10.35750/2071-8284-2023-2-157-162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Through the study of 500 convictions handed down by various courts of first instance from 2016 to 2020, the author found that the mitigating circumstance “repentance for the deed”, applied by the courts on the basis of Part 2 of Art. 61 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is taken into account more often than those indicated in the list of Part 1 of Art. 61 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. In this regard, the article analyzes the history of occurrence of the considered mitigating circumstance in the regulatory legal acts of the pre-revolutionary and Soviet periods, raises the question of the possibility of its inclusion in the list of Part 1 of Art. 61 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, as well as of the establishment of criteria for the application of this mitigating circumstance. \nResearch methods: The article is based on general scientific (analysis, synthesis and formal-logical) and special (formal-legal, historical, statistical, questionnaire method) research methods. \nResearch results: The author of the article comes to the conclusion that the mitigating circumstance «repentance for the deed» should be taken into account by the courts in cases where the perpetrator confirmed his repentance by positive post-criminal behavior, and only when he had not previously committed similar crimes (had not been convicted or released due to non-rehabilitating circumstances from criminal liability). In this case, there is no need to include this mitigating circumstance in the list of Part 1 of Art. 61 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.","PeriodicalId":43418,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik St Petersburg University-Mathematics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The possibility of taking into account the perpetrator’s repentance of a committed crime as a circumstance mitigating the punishment\",\"authors\":\"E.V. Shimanovich\",\"doi\":\"10.35750/2071-8284-2023-2-157-162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Through the study of 500 convictions handed down by various courts of first instance from 2016 to 2020, the author found that the mitigating circumstance “repentance for the deed”, applied by the courts on the basis of Part 2 of Art. 61 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is taken into account more often than those indicated in the list of Part 1 of Art. 61 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. In this regard, the article analyzes the history of occurrence of the considered mitigating circumstance in the regulatory legal acts of the pre-revolutionary and Soviet periods, raises the question of the possibility of its inclusion in the list of Part 1 of Art. 61 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, as well as of the establishment of criteria for the application of this mitigating circumstance. \\nResearch methods: The article is based on general scientific (analysis, synthesis and formal-logical) and special (formal-legal, historical, statistical, questionnaire method) research methods. \\nResearch results: The author of the article comes to the conclusion that the mitigating circumstance «repentance for the deed» should be taken into account by the courts in cases where the perpetrator confirmed his repentance by positive post-criminal behavior, and only when he had not previously committed similar crimes (had not been convicted or released due to non-rehabilitating circumstances from criminal liability). In this case, there is no need to include this mitigating circumstance in the list of Part 1 of Art. 61 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik St Petersburg University-Mathematics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik St Petersburg University-Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2023-2-157-162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik St Petersburg University-Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2023-2-157-162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:通过对2016年至2020年各法院一审判决的500起定罪案件的研究,笔者发现,法院在《俄罗斯联邦刑法》第61条第2部分基础上适用的“悔罪”减刑情节,比《俄罗斯联邦刑法》第61条第1部分清单中所列的减刑情节考虑得更多。在这方面,本文分析了在革命前和苏联时期的管制法律行为中所考虑的减轻情节的发生历史,提出了将其列入《俄罗斯联邦刑法》第61条第1部分清单的可能性的问题,以及确定适用这种减轻情节的标准的问题。研究方法:本文采用一般科学(分析、综合、形式逻辑)和特殊(形式法律、历史、统计、问卷调查)的研究方法。研究结果:本文作者认为,只有在行为人以积极的犯罪后行为确认其悔罪的情况下,且行为人以前没有犯过类似的罪行(未因刑事责任未康复的情况而被定罪或释放),法院才应考虑“悔罪”的减刑情节。在这种情况下,没有必要在《俄罗斯联邦刑法》第61条第1部分的清单中列入这种减轻罪行的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The possibility of taking into account the perpetrator’s repentance of a committed crime as a circumstance mitigating the punishment
Introduction: Through the study of 500 convictions handed down by various courts of first instance from 2016 to 2020, the author found that the mitigating circumstance “repentance for the deed”, applied by the courts on the basis of Part 2 of Art. 61 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is taken into account more often than those indicated in the list of Part 1 of Art. 61 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. In this regard, the article analyzes the history of occurrence of the considered mitigating circumstance in the regulatory legal acts of the pre-revolutionary and Soviet periods, raises the question of the possibility of its inclusion in the list of Part 1 of Art. 61 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, as well as of the establishment of criteria for the application of this mitigating circumstance. Research methods: The article is based on general scientific (analysis, synthesis and formal-logical) and special (formal-legal, historical, statistical, questionnaire method) research methods. Research results: The author of the article comes to the conclusion that the mitigating circumstance «repentance for the deed» should be taken into account by the courts in cases where the perpetrator confirmed his repentance by positive post-criminal behavior, and only when he had not previously committed similar crimes (had not been convicted or released due to non-rehabilitating circumstances from criminal liability). In this case, there is no need to include this mitigating circumstance in the list of Part 1 of Art. 61 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
50.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Vestnik St. Petersburg University, Mathematics  is a journal that publishes original contributions in all areas of fundamental and applied mathematics. It is the prime outlet for the findings of scientists from the Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics of St. Petersburg State University. Articles of the journal cover the major areas of fundamental and applied mathematics. The following are the main subject headings: Mathematical Analysis; Higher Algebra and Numbers Theory; Higher Geometry; Differential Equations; Mathematical Physics; Computational Mathematics and Numerical Analysis; Statistical Simulation; Theoretical Cybernetics; Game Theory; Operations Research; Theory of Probability and Mathematical Statistics, and Mathematical Problems of Mechanics and Astronomy.
期刊最新文献
Solution of the Local-Boundary-Value Problem of Control for a Nonlinear Stationary System Taking into Account Computer System Verification On the Approximation of the Attraction Field of a Rigid Body by the Attraction Field of Four Material Points of the Same Mass Rigid-Body Dynamics from the Euler Equations to the Attitude Control of Spacecraft in the Works of Scientists from St. Petersburg State University. Part 2 Regression Models for Calculating State-to-State Coefficients of the Rate of Vibrational Energy Exchanges Astronomical Research at the Mathematics Faculty of St. Petersburg University, I
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1