克罗地亚语母语反身结构习得中反身定语的遗漏与过度概括

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Rasprave Pub Date : 2022-07-29 DOI:10.31724/rihjj.48.1.7
Eva Pavlinušić Vilus, Gordana Hržica
{"title":"克罗地亚语母语反身结构习得中反身定语的遗漏与过度概括","authors":"Eva Pavlinušić Vilus, Gordana Hržica","doi":"10.31724/rihjj.48.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Verb constructions with a reflexive marker are termed “reflexive constructions”. Reflexive constructions in language acquisition research have been studied mainly within a formal theoretical framework while focusing on developmental differences in comprehension of syntactically bound or free pronominal elements. The present study aimed to determine the acquisition pathway of reflexive constructions in Croatian by examining the errors that children produce in early stages of acquisition. Correct and erroneous reflexive verb constructions were extracted from the spontaneous language production of three children previously recorded and transcribed for the Croatian Corpus of Child Language (Kovačević 2003). Errors were classified as omissions or overgeneralizations and further analyzed with respect to the type of reflexive construction, the complexity of the verb’s argument structure and consistency between the reflexive marker and verb. The results showed that children initially omitted the reflexive marker, then gradually introduced it into their production, occasionally overextending its use and thus producing overgeneralization errors. With age they became more successful in producing reflexive constructions. Consistent use of a reflexive marker alongside the verb in child-directed speech influenced the error rates in different types of reflexive constructions, while potential influence of the complexity of argument structure needs to be studied further.","PeriodicalId":51986,"journal":{"name":"Rasprave","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Omissions and Overgeneralizations of Reflexive Clitic in the Acquisition of Reflexive Constructions in Croatian as L1\",\"authors\":\"Eva Pavlinušić Vilus, Gordana Hržica\",\"doi\":\"10.31724/rihjj.48.1.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Verb constructions with a reflexive marker are termed “reflexive constructions”. Reflexive constructions in language acquisition research have been studied mainly within a formal theoretical framework while focusing on developmental differences in comprehension of syntactically bound or free pronominal elements. The present study aimed to determine the acquisition pathway of reflexive constructions in Croatian by examining the errors that children produce in early stages of acquisition. Correct and erroneous reflexive verb constructions were extracted from the spontaneous language production of three children previously recorded and transcribed for the Croatian Corpus of Child Language (Kovačević 2003). Errors were classified as omissions or overgeneralizations and further analyzed with respect to the type of reflexive construction, the complexity of the verb’s argument structure and consistency between the reflexive marker and verb. The results showed that children initially omitted the reflexive marker, then gradually introduced it into their production, occasionally overextending its use and thus producing overgeneralization errors. With age they became more successful in producing reflexive constructions. Consistent use of a reflexive marker alongside the verb in child-directed speech influenced the error rates in different types of reflexive constructions, while potential influence of the complexity of argument structure needs to be studied further.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rasprave\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rasprave\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31724/rihjj.48.1.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rasprave","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31724/rihjj.48.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

带有反身标记的动词结构称为“反身结构”。语言习得研究中的反身结构主要在形式理论框架内进行研究,而关注的是对句法约束或自由代词成分的理解的发展差异。本研究旨在通过检查儿童在习得早期阶段产生的错误来确定克罗地亚语反身结构的习得途径。正确和错误的反身动词结构是从三个孩子的自发语言生产中提取出来的,这些孩子之前记录并转录在克罗地亚儿童语言语料库中(kova evovic 2003)。将错误分类为遗漏或过度概括,并从反身结构的类型、动词论点结构的复杂性以及反身标记与动词的一致性等方面进行分析。结果表明,儿童最初忽略了自反标记,然后逐渐将其引入到他们的生产中,偶尔过度使用它,从而产生过度概括错误。随着年龄的增长,他们在创造反身结构方面变得更加成功。在儿童指向语中,与动词同时使用反身标记会影响不同类型反身结构的错误率,而论点结构复杂性的潜在影响有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Omissions and Overgeneralizations of Reflexive Clitic in the Acquisition of Reflexive Constructions in Croatian as L1
Verb constructions with a reflexive marker are termed “reflexive constructions”. Reflexive constructions in language acquisition research have been studied mainly within a formal theoretical framework while focusing on developmental differences in comprehension of syntactically bound or free pronominal elements. The present study aimed to determine the acquisition pathway of reflexive constructions in Croatian by examining the errors that children produce in early stages of acquisition. Correct and erroneous reflexive verb constructions were extracted from the spontaneous language production of three children previously recorded and transcribed for the Croatian Corpus of Child Language (Kovačević 2003). Errors were classified as omissions or overgeneralizations and further analyzed with respect to the type of reflexive construction, the complexity of the verb’s argument structure and consistency between the reflexive marker and verb. The results showed that children initially omitted the reflexive marker, then gradually introduced it into their production, occasionally overextending its use and thus producing overgeneralization errors. With age they became more successful in producing reflexive constructions. Consistent use of a reflexive marker alongside the verb in child-directed speech influenced the error rates in different types of reflexive constructions, while potential influence of the complexity of argument structure needs to be studied further.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rasprave
Rasprave LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
50.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Jezično-vizualna igra riječi u memetičkom ratovanju protiv ruske agresije u Ukrajini Modalnost u hrvatskom jeziku Explanations of Meaning for Paremiological Genres in the eSSKJ and SPP Dictionaries Croatian Elements in English Dictionaries Insights Into Automatic Extraction of Metaphorical Collocations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1