长宽绝热尖端薄矩形翅片二维传热的比较研究

M. Fakir, S. Khatun
{"title":"长宽绝热尖端薄矩形翅片二维传热的比较研究","authors":"M. Fakir, S. Khatun","doi":"10.15866/IREASE.V10I3.12469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comparative study of the distribution of temperature in a long-wide, insulated-tip rectangular fin. The numerical analysis and comparison of 2-dimensional heat conduction problem have been performed using both finite element method (FEM) and differential quadrature method (DQM). The surface solutions in terms of temperature distribution and error have been presented for comparison using both the methods. In FEM, the elements were generated with equally spaced called conventional FEM (CFEM) and with non-equally spaced called optimum FEM (OFEM). In DQM, the generation of mesh are only with non-equally spaced, called optimum DQM (ODQM). The ambient temperature is considered 20°C. The average percentage errors for OFEM, CFEM and ODQM are respectively 3.77E-02, 1.16E-01 and 4.10E-02. The surface temperature distribution and error comparison reveal that OFEM results are better and more precise than ODQM and CFEM results which show its potentiality.","PeriodicalId":14462,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Aerospace Engineering","volume":"103 1","pages":"167-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two-Dimensional Heat Transfer Through Long-Wide Insulated-Tip Thin Rectangular Fin: a Comparative Study\",\"authors\":\"M. Fakir, S. Khatun\",\"doi\":\"10.15866/IREASE.V10I3.12469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a comparative study of the distribution of temperature in a long-wide, insulated-tip rectangular fin. The numerical analysis and comparison of 2-dimensional heat conduction problem have been performed using both finite element method (FEM) and differential quadrature method (DQM). The surface solutions in terms of temperature distribution and error have been presented for comparison using both the methods. In FEM, the elements were generated with equally spaced called conventional FEM (CFEM) and with non-equally spaced called optimum FEM (OFEM). In DQM, the generation of mesh are only with non-equally spaced, called optimum DQM (ODQM). The ambient temperature is considered 20°C. The average percentage errors for OFEM, CFEM and ODQM are respectively 3.77E-02, 1.16E-01 and 4.10E-02. The surface temperature distribution and error comparison reveal that OFEM results are better and more precise than ODQM and CFEM results which show its potentiality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Aerospace Engineering\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"167-173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Aerospace Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15866/IREASE.V10I3.12469\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Aerospace Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15866/IREASE.V10I3.12469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文采用有限元法(FEM)和微分正交法(DQM)对长宽绝热尖矩形翅片内的温度分布进行了数值分析和比较。给出了两种方法在温度分布和误差方面的表面解,以供比较。在有限元法中,等间距有限元法称为常规有限元法(CFEM),非等间距有限元法称为最优有限元法(OFEM)。在DQM中,只生成非等间距的网格,称为最优DQM (ODQM)。环境温度考虑为20℃。OFEM、CFEM和ODQM的平均误差百分比分别为3.77E-02、1.16E-01和4.10E-02。表面温度分布和误差比较表明,OFEM计算结果比ODQM和CFEM计算结果更精确,显示了其潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Two-Dimensional Heat Transfer Through Long-Wide Insulated-Tip Thin Rectangular Fin: a Comparative Study
This paper presents a comparative study of the distribution of temperature in a long-wide, insulated-tip rectangular fin. The numerical analysis and comparison of 2-dimensional heat conduction problem have been performed using both finite element method (FEM) and differential quadrature method (DQM). The surface solutions in terms of temperature distribution and error have been presented for comparison using both the methods. In FEM, the elements were generated with equally spaced called conventional FEM (CFEM) and with non-equally spaced called optimum FEM (OFEM). In DQM, the generation of mesh are only with non-equally spaced, called optimum DQM (ODQM). The ambient temperature is considered 20°C. The average percentage errors for OFEM, CFEM and ODQM are respectively 3.77E-02, 1.16E-01 and 4.10E-02. The surface temperature distribution and error comparison reveal that OFEM results are better and more precise than ODQM and CFEM results which show its potentiality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Numerical Analysis of Reduced Frequency on Flapping Tandem Foils Numerical Study on Aerodynamics Characteristics of R-HAN122 Along with Nose Modification Some Results of the Mobile Space Testing Facility Metamorphosis Prototype Design, Development and Test The System of Rotor Blade Tip’s Illumination for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Aerodynamic Performance and Stability of a Transonic Axial Compressor Stage with an Airfoil Vortex Generator
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1