混合系统设计的语言和工具

L. Carloni, R. Passerone, A. Pinto, A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli
{"title":"混合系统设计的语言和工具","authors":"L. Carloni, R. Passerone, A. Pinto, A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli","doi":"10.1561/1000000001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The explosive growth of embedded electronics is bringing information and control systems of increasing complexity to every aspects of our lives. The most challenging designs are safety-critical systems, such as transportation systems (e.g., airplanes, cars, and trains), industrial plants and health care monitoring. The difficulties reside in accommodating constraints both on functionality and implementation. The correct behavior must be guaranteed under diverse states of the environment and potential failures; implementation has to meet cost, size, and power consumption requirements. The design is therefore subject to extensive mathematical analysis and simulation. However, traditional models of information systems do not interface well to the continuous evolving nature of the environment in which these devices operate. Thus, in practice, different mathematical representations have to be mixed to analyze the overall behavior of the system. Hybrid systems are a particular class of mixed models that focus on the combination of discrete and continuous subsystems. There is a wealth of tools and languages that have been proposed over the years to handle hybrid systems. However, each tool makes different assumptions on the environment, resulting in somewhat different notions of hybrid system. This makes it difficult to share information among tools. Thus, the community cannot maximally leverage the substantial amount of work that has been directed to this important topic. In this paper, we review and compare hybrid system tools by highlighting their differences in terms of their underlying semantics, expressive power and mathematical mechanisms. We conclude our review with a comparative summary, which suggests the need for a unifying approach to hybrid systems design. As a step in this direction, we make the case for a semantic-aware interchange format, which would enable the use of joint techniques, make a formal comparison between different approaches possible, and facilitate exporting and importing design representations.","PeriodicalId":42137,"journal":{"name":"Foundations and Trends in Electronic Design Automation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"201","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Languages and Tools for Hybrid Systems Design\",\"authors\":\"L. Carloni, R. Passerone, A. Pinto, A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1561/1000000001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The explosive growth of embedded electronics is bringing information and control systems of increasing complexity to every aspects of our lives. The most challenging designs are safety-critical systems, such as transportation systems (e.g., airplanes, cars, and trains), industrial plants and health care monitoring. The difficulties reside in accommodating constraints both on functionality and implementation. The correct behavior must be guaranteed under diverse states of the environment and potential failures; implementation has to meet cost, size, and power consumption requirements. The design is therefore subject to extensive mathematical analysis and simulation. However, traditional models of information systems do not interface well to the continuous evolving nature of the environment in which these devices operate. Thus, in practice, different mathematical representations have to be mixed to analyze the overall behavior of the system. Hybrid systems are a particular class of mixed models that focus on the combination of discrete and continuous subsystems. There is a wealth of tools and languages that have been proposed over the years to handle hybrid systems. However, each tool makes different assumptions on the environment, resulting in somewhat different notions of hybrid system. This makes it difficult to share information among tools. Thus, the community cannot maximally leverage the substantial amount of work that has been directed to this important topic. In this paper, we review and compare hybrid system tools by highlighting their differences in terms of their underlying semantics, expressive power and mathematical mechanisms. We conclude our review with a comparative summary, which suggests the need for a unifying approach to hybrid systems design. As a step in this direction, we make the case for a semantic-aware interchange format, which would enable the use of joint techniques, make a formal comparison between different approaches possible, and facilitate exporting and importing design representations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foundations and Trends in Electronic Design Automation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"201\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foundations and Trends in Electronic Design Automation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1561/1000000001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Computer Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundations and Trends in Electronic Design Automation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1561/1000000001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 201

摘要

嵌入式电子产品的爆炸式增长正在将日益复杂的信息和控制系统带入我们生活的方方面面。最具挑战性的设计是安全关键系统,如运输系统(如飞机、汽车和火车)、工业厂房和卫生保健监测。困难在于适应功能和实现方面的限制。必须保证在各种环境状态和潜在故障下的正确行为;实现必须满足成本、大小和功耗要求。因此,该设计需要进行广泛的数学分析和模拟。然而,传统的信息系统模型不能很好地与这些设备运行的环境的不断发展的本质相结合。因此,在实践中,必须混合不同的数学表示来分析系统的整体行为。混合系统是一类特殊的混合模型,关注于离散和连续子系统的组合。多年来,已经提出了大量的工具和语言来处理混合系统。然而,每种工具对环境做出了不同的假设,从而导致混合系统的概念有所不同。这使得在工具之间共享信息变得困难。因此,社区无法最大限度地利用针对这一重要主题的大量工作。在本文中,我们回顾和比较了混合系统工具,重点介绍了它们在底层语义、表达能力和数学机制方面的差异。我们以一个比较的总结来结束我们的回顾,这表明需要一个统一的方法来设计混合系统。作为朝这个方向迈出的一步,我们提出了语义感知的交换格式,它将支持联合技术的使用,使不同方法之间的正式比较成为可能,并促进导出和导入设计表示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Languages and Tools for Hybrid Systems Design
The explosive growth of embedded electronics is bringing information and control systems of increasing complexity to every aspects of our lives. The most challenging designs are safety-critical systems, such as transportation systems (e.g., airplanes, cars, and trains), industrial plants and health care monitoring. The difficulties reside in accommodating constraints both on functionality and implementation. The correct behavior must be guaranteed under diverse states of the environment and potential failures; implementation has to meet cost, size, and power consumption requirements. The design is therefore subject to extensive mathematical analysis and simulation. However, traditional models of information systems do not interface well to the continuous evolving nature of the environment in which these devices operate. Thus, in practice, different mathematical representations have to be mixed to analyze the overall behavior of the system. Hybrid systems are a particular class of mixed models that focus on the combination of discrete and continuous subsystems. There is a wealth of tools and languages that have been proposed over the years to handle hybrid systems. However, each tool makes different assumptions on the environment, resulting in somewhat different notions of hybrid system. This makes it difficult to share information among tools. Thus, the community cannot maximally leverage the substantial amount of work that has been directed to this important topic. In this paper, we review and compare hybrid system tools by highlighting their differences in terms of their underlying semantics, expressive power and mathematical mechanisms. We conclude our review with a comparative summary, which suggests the need for a unifying approach to hybrid systems design. As a step in this direction, we make the case for a semantic-aware interchange format, which would enable the use of joint techniques, make a formal comparison between different approaches possible, and facilitate exporting and importing design representations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foundations and Trends in Electronic Design Automation
Foundations and Trends in Electronic Design Automation ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Foundations and Trends® in Electronic Design Automation publishes survey and tutorial articles in the following topics: - System Level Design - Behavioral Synthesis - Logic Design - Verification - Test - Physical Design - Circuit Level Design - Reconfigurable Systems - Analog Design Each issue of Foundations and Trends® in Electronic Design Automation comprises a 50-100 page monograph written by research leaders in the field.
期刊最新文献
From CNN to DNN Hardware Accelerators: A Survey on Design, Exploration, Simulation, and Frameworks Self-Powered Wearable IoT Devices for Health and Activity Monitoring On-Chip Dynamic Resource Management Contracts for System Design Non-Boolean Computing with Spintronic Devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1