关于自适应测试的自适应度量

IF 0.6 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/15366367.2021.1922232
Zhongmin Cui
{"title":"关于自适应测试的自适应度量","authors":"Zhongmin Cui","doi":"10.1080/15366367.2021.1922232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Although many educational and psychological tests are labeled as computerized adaptive test (CAT), not all tests show the same level of adaptivity – some tests might not have much adaptation because of various constraints imposed by test developers. Researchers have proposed some indices to measure the amount of adaption for an adaptive test. This article shows some limitations of the existing indices. A new index of adaptivity is proposed in this article. Its performance was evaluated in a simulation. The results show that the new index was able to overcome some of the limitations of the existing indices in the simulated scenarios.","PeriodicalId":46596,"journal":{"name":"Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives","volume":"24 1","pages":"21 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Measuring Adaptivity of an Adaptive Test\",\"authors\":\"Zhongmin Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15366367.2021.1922232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Although many educational and psychological tests are labeled as computerized adaptive test (CAT), not all tests show the same level of adaptivity – some tests might not have much adaptation because of various constraints imposed by test developers. Researchers have proposed some indices to measure the amount of adaption for an adaptive test. This article shows some limitations of the existing indices. A new index of adaptivity is proposed in this article. Its performance was evaluated in a simulation. The results show that the new index was able to overcome some of the limitations of the existing indices in the simulated scenarios.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"21 - 33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2021.1922232\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2021.1922232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然许多教育和心理测试被标记为计算机化的适应性测试(CAT),但并非所有的测试都显示出相同的适应性水平——由于测试开发人员施加的各种限制,一些测试可能没有太多的适应性。研究人员提出了一些指标来衡量适应测试的适应程度。本文指出了现有指标的一些局限性。本文提出了一种新的自适应指标。通过仿真对其性能进行了评价。结果表明,新指标能够克服现有指标在模拟场景中的一些局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On Measuring Adaptivity of an Adaptive Test
ABSTRACT Although many educational and psychological tests are labeled as computerized adaptive test (CAT), not all tests show the same level of adaptivity – some tests might not have much adaptation because of various constraints imposed by test developers. Researchers have proposed some indices to measure the amount of adaption for an adaptive test. This article shows some limitations of the existing indices. A new index of adaptivity is proposed in this article. Its performance was evaluated in a simulation. The results show that the new index was able to overcome some of the limitations of the existing indices in the simulated scenarios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives
Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
A Latent Trait Approach to the Measurement of Physical Fitness Application of Machine Learning Techniques for Fake News Classification The Use of Multidimensional Item Response Theory Estimations in Controlling Differential Item Functioning Opinion Instability and Measurement Errors: A G-Theory Analysis of College Students Predicting the Risk of Diabetes and Heart Disease with Machine Learning Classifiers: The Mediation Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1