6ER-032新冠肺炎大流行时期的民意和个人情况

S. Filkova, O. Krstic
{"title":"6ER-032新冠肺炎大流行时期的民意和个人情况","authors":"S. Filkova, O. Krstic","doi":"10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and importance Recent results showed that most European citizens want the European Union (EU) to provide more financial support to overcome the impact of the pandemic. Public health tops the priority list followed by economic recovery. Findings revealed that more than 75% of Europeans on average have heard about the measures taken by the EU against COVID-19 and a rising number of respondents are now satisfied with these measures. Simultaneously, a majority is nevertheless still not satisfied with the solidarity shown among EU member states during the crisis. What is the opinion of a non-EU country? Aim and objectives To explore and evaluate the national perception of a non-member state about the EU response to the COVID-19 pandemic, EU competences and budget, satisfaction with EU measures, solidarity among member and non-member states and personal circumstances and financial consequences of COVID-19. A survey was conducted (August–September 2020) in 164 randomly selected participants, aged 18–64 years. Material and methods The questionnaire consisted of eight adapted questions from the European Parliament specific survey ‘Public opinion in the EU in time of coronavirus crisis 2’. The interviews were conducted by telephone. Results Around 63% of respondents had heard that the EU proposed various measures to fight the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, but more than half (57%) did not know what they were. Of those who were familiar with them, 40% reported satisfaction. Most respondents (72%) were not satisfied with the solidarity among EU and non-EU member states. Asked about the policy fields where this enlarged budget should be spent, public health was a priority (65%), followed by economic recovery and new opportunities for businesses (53%), and employment and social affairs (41%). A clear majority (79%) supported a larger budget to fight COVID-19. 75% of respondents reported experiencing personal financial difficulties. The feelings that best described their current emotional state were uncertainty (63%), helplessness (32%), fear (23%), hope (43%) and confidence (28%). Conclusion and relevance Public opinion in the time of COVID-19 did not differ significantly from the opinion of European citizens. However, most respondents were not satisfied with the solidarity among EU and non-EU member states. Personal financial difficulties remain significant. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest","PeriodicalId":11991,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy: Science and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"6ER-032 Public opinion and personal situation in times of the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"S. Filkova, O. Krstic\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and importance Recent results showed that most European citizens want the European Union (EU) to provide more financial support to overcome the impact of the pandemic. Public health tops the priority list followed by economic recovery. Findings revealed that more than 75% of Europeans on average have heard about the measures taken by the EU against COVID-19 and a rising number of respondents are now satisfied with these measures. Simultaneously, a majority is nevertheless still not satisfied with the solidarity shown among EU member states during the crisis. What is the opinion of a non-EU country? Aim and objectives To explore and evaluate the national perception of a non-member state about the EU response to the COVID-19 pandemic, EU competences and budget, satisfaction with EU measures, solidarity among member and non-member states and personal circumstances and financial consequences of COVID-19. A survey was conducted (August–September 2020) in 164 randomly selected participants, aged 18–64 years. Material and methods The questionnaire consisted of eight adapted questions from the European Parliament specific survey ‘Public opinion in the EU in time of coronavirus crisis 2’. The interviews were conducted by telephone. Results Around 63% of respondents had heard that the EU proposed various measures to fight the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, but more than half (57%) did not know what they were. Of those who were familiar with them, 40% reported satisfaction. Most respondents (72%) were not satisfied with the solidarity among EU and non-EU member states. Asked about the policy fields where this enlarged budget should be spent, public health was a priority (65%), followed by economic recovery and new opportunities for businesses (53%), and employment and social affairs (41%). A clear majority (79%) supported a larger budget to fight COVID-19. 75% of respondents reported experiencing personal financial difficulties. The feelings that best described their current emotional state were uncertainty (63%), helplessness (32%), fear (23%), hope (43%) and confidence (28%). Conclusion and relevance Public opinion in the time of COVID-19 did not differ significantly from the opinion of European citizens. However, most respondents were not satisfied with the solidarity among EU and non-EU member states. Personal financial difficulties remain significant. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest\",\"PeriodicalId\":11991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy: Science and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy: Science and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.356\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy: Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和重要性最近的结果表明,大多数欧洲公民希望欧洲联盟(欧盟)提供更多的财政支持,以克服大流行的影响。公共卫生排在首位,其次是经济复苏。调查结果显示,平均超过75%的欧洲人听说过欧盟采取的抗疫措施,越来越多的受访者对这些措施感到满意。与此同时,大多数人仍对欧盟成员国在危机期间表现出的团结不满意。非欧盟国家对此有何看法?目的和目标探索和评估非成员国对欧盟应对COVID-19大流行的国家看法、欧盟的能力和预算、对欧盟措施的满意度、成员国和非成员国之间的团结以及COVID-19的个人情况和财务后果。2020年8月至9月,对164名年龄在18-64岁之间的随机参与者进行了一项调查。问卷由8个问题改编而成,这些问题来自欧洲议会的专项调查“冠状病毒危机时期欧盟的公众舆论”。采访是通过电话进行的。结果约63%的受访者听说欧盟提出了各种措施来应对COVID-19大流行的后果,但超过一半(57%)的受访者不知道这些措施是什么。在那些熟悉他们的人中,40%的人表示满意。大多数受访者(72%)对欧盟和非欧盟成员国之间的团结不满意。在被问及扩大后的预算应用于哪些政策领域时,公共卫生是优先事项(65%),其次是经济复苏和企业新机会(53%),以及就业和社会事务(41%)。绝大多数人(79%)支持增加抗击COVID-19的预算。75%的受访者表示遇到了个人财务困难。最能描述他们当前情绪状态的感受是不确定(63%)、无助(32%)、恐惧(23%)、希望(43%)和自信(28%)。新冠肺炎疫情时期的民意与欧洲公民的民意没有显著差异。然而,大多数受访者对欧盟和非欧盟成员国之间的团结并不满意。个人经济困难依然严重。参考文献和/或致谢利益冲突无利益冲突
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
6ER-032 Public opinion and personal situation in times of the COVID-19 pandemic
Background and importance Recent results showed that most European citizens want the European Union (EU) to provide more financial support to overcome the impact of the pandemic. Public health tops the priority list followed by economic recovery. Findings revealed that more than 75% of Europeans on average have heard about the measures taken by the EU against COVID-19 and a rising number of respondents are now satisfied with these measures. Simultaneously, a majority is nevertheless still not satisfied with the solidarity shown among EU member states during the crisis. What is the opinion of a non-EU country? Aim and objectives To explore and evaluate the national perception of a non-member state about the EU response to the COVID-19 pandemic, EU competences and budget, satisfaction with EU measures, solidarity among member and non-member states and personal circumstances and financial consequences of COVID-19. A survey was conducted (August–September 2020) in 164 randomly selected participants, aged 18–64 years. Material and methods The questionnaire consisted of eight adapted questions from the European Parliament specific survey ‘Public opinion in the EU in time of coronavirus crisis 2’. The interviews were conducted by telephone. Results Around 63% of respondents had heard that the EU proposed various measures to fight the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, but more than half (57%) did not know what they were. Of those who were familiar with them, 40% reported satisfaction. Most respondents (72%) were not satisfied with the solidarity among EU and non-EU member states. Asked about the policy fields where this enlarged budget should be spent, public health was a priority (65%), followed by economic recovery and new opportunities for businesses (53%), and employment and social affairs (41%). A clear majority (79%) supported a larger budget to fight COVID-19. 75% of respondents reported experiencing personal financial difficulties. The feelings that best described their current emotional state were uncertainty (63%), helplessness (32%), fear (23%), hope (43%) and confidence (28%). Conclusion and relevance Public opinion in the time of COVID-19 did not differ significantly from the opinion of European citizens. However, most respondents were not satisfied with the solidarity among EU and non-EU member states. Personal financial difficulties remain significant. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Frequency of measuring body weight in (sub)populations of patients with cancer treated with chemotherapy. 4CPS-279 Cancer pain management approach considering potential drug interactions in patients receiving oral antitumour treatment 2SPD-048 Political report—options to break through medicine shortages 4CPS-239 Therapeutic drug monitoring of gentamicin in neonates 4CPS-390 Dispensing of anticancer investigational drugs during lockdown for the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: experience in an oncological centre
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1