国际贸易争端裁决:从成功到危机。接下来是什么?

G. Sacerdoti
{"title":"国际贸易争端裁决:从成功到危机。接下来是什么?","authors":"G. Sacerdoti","doi":"10.1163/15718034-12341501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe WTO Appellate Body ceased to operate at the beginning of 2020, leading to the semi-paralysis of the WTO’s well-functioning dispute settlement system as a consequence of the blockage of the appointment of its members by the US.\nThis article traces back to the development of trade adjudication within the broader process of the “judicialization” of international relations, from the GATT to the WTO, highlighting the latter’s innovations and successful functioning for more than 20 years.\nThe US-led paralysis has evidenced the fragility of international adjudication when faced with powerful opposition. It remains to be seen whether the support for revitalizing the WTO and its dispute settlement system expressed by the WTO Members at the Ministerial Conference of June 2022 will result in reinstating a functioning system, capable of meeting the needs of international trade in a global but increasingly politicized and fractured context.","PeriodicalId":42613,"journal":{"name":"Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adjudication of International Trade Disputes: from Success to Crisis. What’s Next?\",\"authors\":\"G. Sacerdoti\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718034-12341501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe WTO Appellate Body ceased to operate at the beginning of 2020, leading to the semi-paralysis of the WTO’s well-functioning dispute settlement system as a consequence of the blockage of the appointment of its members by the US.\\nThis article traces back to the development of trade adjudication within the broader process of the “judicialization” of international relations, from the GATT to the WTO, highlighting the latter’s innovations and successful functioning for more than 20 years.\\nThe US-led paralysis has evidenced the fragility of international adjudication when faced with powerful opposition. It remains to be seen whether the support for revitalizing the WTO and its dispute settlement system expressed by the WTO Members at the Ministerial Conference of June 2022 will result in reinstating a functioning system, capable of meeting the needs of international trade in a global but increasingly politicized and fractured context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世贸组织上诉机构于2020年初停止运作,由于美国阻挠任命上诉机构成员,导致运转良好的世贸组织争端解决机制陷入半瘫痪状态。本文追溯了从关贸总协定到世贸组织这一更广泛的国际关系“司法化”进程中贸易裁决的发展,重点介绍了后者20多年来的创新和成功运作。美国领导的瘫痪证明了国际裁决在面对强大反对时的脆弱性。世贸组织成员在2022年6月部长级会议上表达的对重振世贸组织及其争端解决机制的支持,是否能够恢复一个正常运转的体系,在全球化但日益政治化和分裂的背景下满足国际贸易的需求,还有待观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adjudication of International Trade Disputes: from Success to Crisis. What’s Next?
The WTO Appellate Body ceased to operate at the beginning of 2020, leading to the semi-paralysis of the WTO’s well-functioning dispute settlement system as a consequence of the blockage of the appointment of its members by the US. This article traces back to the development of trade adjudication within the broader process of the “judicialization” of international relations, from the GATT to the WTO, highlighting the latter’s innovations and successful functioning for more than 20 years. The US-led paralysis has evidenced the fragility of international adjudication when faced with powerful opposition. It remains to be seen whether the support for revitalizing the WTO and its dispute settlement system expressed by the WTO Members at the Ministerial Conference of June 2022 will result in reinstating a functioning system, capable of meeting the needs of international trade in a global but increasingly politicized and fractured context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
40.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals is firmly established as the leading journal in its field. Each issue will give you the latest developments with respect to the preparation, adoption, suspension, amendment and revision of Rules of Procedure as well as statutory and internal rules and other related matters. The Journal will also provide you with the latest practice with respect to the interpretation and application of rules of procedure and constitutional documents, which can be found in judgments, advisory opinions, written and oral pleadings as well as legal literature.
期刊最新文献
Situating “Deformalization” within the International Court of Justice: Understanding Institutionalised Informality The World Is Burning, Urgently and Irreparably – a Plea for Interim Protection against Climatic Change at the ICJ “Cross Treaty Interpretation” en bloc or How CAFTA-DR Tribunals Are Systematically Interpreting the FET Standard Based on NAFTA Case Law The Asian Turn in Foreign Investment, edited by Mahdev Mohan and Chester Brown Not Just a Participation Trophy? Advancing Public Interests through Advisory Opinions at the International Court of Justice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1