由合金和碳纤维制成的假肢运行叶片的静态行为

IF 1.7 Q2 REHABILITATION Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.57197/jdr-2023-0010
Md Irfanul Haque Siddiqui, Latif Arifudin, I. Alnaser, Ahmed Hassan, Khalid Alluhydan
{"title":"由合金和碳纤维制成的假肢运行叶片的静态行为","authors":"Md Irfanul Haque Siddiqui, Latif Arifudin, I. Alnaser, Ahmed Hassan, Khalid Alluhydan","doi":"10.57197/jdr-2023-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prosthetic running blades offer a solution for individuals with disabilities to engage in sports, benefiting them both psychologically and physiologically. Furthermore, a good prosthetic running blade in terms of performance and cost is rarely available to all disabled persons. In this study, we have examined how various materials impact the static behavior of the prosthetic running blade. A finite element numerical analysis was conducted on a prosthetic design to investigate this effect. We have used different materials for investigation such as aluminum alloy (2024 T4), stainless steel (AISI 316), carbon fiber, and titanium alloy (grade 5), under different load conditions. The load conditions have been varied mainly to three conditions, namely, rest (700 N), walking (1400 N), and running (2100 N). In our experimental design, we studied total deformation, equivalent stress, and strain energy to understand the performance based on material choice. It was noticed that the aluminum alloy (2024 T4) blade goes under much deformation when compared to titanium- and carbon fiber-made running blades. The least amount of overall deformation occurs in carbon fiber under varying load conditions. Carbon fiber appears to be the most profitable option due to its lowest cost per running blade. Titanium alloy grade 5, carbon fiber, AISI 316 stainless steel, and aluminum 2024 T4 alloy cost a total of 78.1, 48.5, 67.6, and 20.9 USD, respectively. It is evident that titanium alloy materials carry a higher price compared to alternative materials.","PeriodicalId":46073,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research","volume":"104 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Static Behavior of a Prosthetic Running Blade Made from Alloys and Carbon Fiber\",\"authors\":\"Md Irfanul Haque Siddiqui, Latif Arifudin, I. Alnaser, Ahmed Hassan, Khalid Alluhydan\",\"doi\":\"10.57197/jdr-2023-0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Prosthetic running blades offer a solution for individuals with disabilities to engage in sports, benefiting them both psychologically and physiologically. Furthermore, a good prosthetic running blade in terms of performance and cost is rarely available to all disabled persons. In this study, we have examined how various materials impact the static behavior of the prosthetic running blade. A finite element numerical analysis was conducted on a prosthetic design to investigate this effect. We have used different materials for investigation such as aluminum alloy (2024 T4), stainless steel (AISI 316), carbon fiber, and titanium alloy (grade 5), under different load conditions. The load conditions have been varied mainly to three conditions, namely, rest (700 N), walking (1400 N), and running (2100 N). In our experimental design, we studied total deformation, equivalent stress, and strain energy to understand the performance based on material choice. It was noticed that the aluminum alloy (2024 T4) blade goes under much deformation when compared to titanium- and carbon fiber-made running blades. The least amount of overall deformation occurs in carbon fiber under varying load conditions. Carbon fiber appears to be the most profitable option due to its lowest cost per running blade. Titanium alloy grade 5, carbon fiber, AISI 316 stainless steel, and aluminum 2024 T4 alloy cost a total of 78.1, 48.5, 67.6, and 20.9 USD, respectively. It is evident that titanium alloy materials carry a higher price compared to alternative materials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.57197/jdr-2023-0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57197/jdr-2023-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

假肢跑步叶片为残疾人从事体育运动提供了一种解决方案,使他们在心理和生理上都受益。此外,在性能和成本方面,良好的假肢跑刃很少能提供给所有残疾人。在这项研究中,我们研究了不同的材料是如何影响假肢运行叶片的静态行为的。采用有限元数值分析方法对一种假肢设计进行了研究。在不同的载荷条件下,我们使用了铝合金(2024 T4)、不锈钢(AISI 316)、碳纤维和钛合金(5级)等不同的材料进行研究。载荷条件主要分为休息(700 N)、行走(1400 N)和跑步(2100 N)三种工况。在实验设计中,我们研究了总变形、等效应力和应变能,以了解基于材料选择的性能。值得注意的是,铝合金(2024 T4)叶片比钛和碳纤维制造的叶片变形更大。在不同的载荷条件下,碳纤维的整体变形量最小。碳纤维似乎是最有利可图的选择,因为它的每运行叶片成本最低。5级钛合金、碳纤维、AISI 316不锈钢、2024 T4铝合金的价格分别为78.1美元、48.5美元、67.6美元、20.9美元。很明显,钛合金材料与其他材料相比价格更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Static Behavior of a Prosthetic Running Blade Made from Alloys and Carbon Fiber
Prosthetic running blades offer a solution for individuals with disabilities to engage in sports, benefiting them both psychologically and physiologically. Furthermore, a good prosthetic running blade in terms of performance and cost is rarely available to all disabled persons. In this study, we have examined how various materials impact the static behavior of the prosthetic running blade. A finite element numerical analysis was conducted on a prosthetic design to investigate this effect. We have used different materials for investigation such as aluminum alloy (2024 T4), stainless steel (AISI 316), carbon fiber, and titanium alloy (grade 5), under different load conditions. The load conditions have been varied mainly to three conditions, namely, rest (700 N), walking (1400 N), and running (2100 N). In our experimental design, we studied total deformation, equivalent stress, and strain energy to understand the performance based on material choice. It was noticed that the aluminum alloy (2024 T4) blade goes under much deformation when compared to titanium- and carbon fiber-made running blades. The least amount of overall deformation occurs in carbon fiber under varying load conditions. Carbon fiber appears to be the most profitable option due to its lowest cost per running blade. Titanium alloy grade 5, carbon fiber, AISI 316 stainless steel, and aluminum 2024 T4 alloy cost a total of 78.1, 48.5, 67.6, and 20.9 USD, respectively. It is evident that titanium alloy materials carry a higher price compared to alternative materials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Scoping Review of Research Exploring Working Life Practices of People with Disabilities During the COVID-19 Pandemic Disability, Race, and Origin Intersectionality in the Doctoral Program: Ableism in Higher Education Numerical Investigation on the Performance of Prosthetic Running Blades by Using Different Materials Prevalence of Premenstrual Syndrome and Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder Among Deaf/Hard-of-Hearing Women with Mood Disorders in Saudi Arabia Layers of Disability Terminology Experiences of People with Disabilities and their Relatives: An Analysis of Dutch Newspapers between 1950–2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1