一个为所有人标准化的房子:美国的小房子

Kristina Borrman
{"title":"一个为所有人标准化的房子:美国的小房子","authors":"Kristina Borrman","doi":"10.5749/BUILDLAND.24.2.0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The federal organization Better Homes in America built a model house in a conspicuous Midtown Manhattan location in 1934. Standing on the corner of 39th Street and Park Avenue, America's Little House drew daily crowds during its nearly one-year run. Better Homes leaders used the model house as an educational demonstration to illustrate how standardized components and methods could make home improvement easier and cheaper. Many of these ideas were inspired by Frederick W. Taylor's philosophy of scientific management, which was originally designed to make industrial work more efficient, but was broadly applied to other fields, including home improvement, during the interwar era. America's Little House was an important testing ground for the federal government, which assembled a team of experts in the fields of architecture, interior design, landscaping, and housekeeping to come up with universal plans that could be used to improve any house. In this way, Better Homes leaders challenged the conventional wisdom that the best houses were individualized ones, and they targeted more efficient domestic labor and consumerism as primary examples of the benefits associated with standardization. America's Little House demonstrated, for example, how women's household chores and purchases could be systematized in order to save time and money. For the Better Homes organization, standardized parts and procedures were more than just practical goals; they were democratic pursuits, undertaken with the belief that economical planning could make home improvement available to all.","PeriodicalId":41826,"journal":{"name":"Buildings & Landscapes-Journal of the Vernacular Architecture Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One Standardized House for All: America's Little House\",\"authors\":\"Kristina Borrman\",\"doi\":\"10.5749/BUILDLAND.24.2.0037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The federal organization Better Homes in America built a model house in a conspicuous Midtown Manhattan location in 1934. Standing on the corner of 39th Street and Park Avenue, America's Little House drew daily crowds during its nearly one-year run. Better Homes leaders used the model house as an educational demonstration to illustrate how standardized components and methods could make home improvement easier and cheaper. Many of these ideas were inspired by Frederick W. Taylor's philosophy of scientific management, which was originally designed to make industrial work more efficient, but was broadly applied to other fields, including home improvement, during the interwar era. America's Little House was an important testing ground for the federal government, which assembled a team of experts in the fields of architecture, interior design, landscaping, and housekeeping to come up with universal plans that could be used to improve any house. In this way, Better Homes leaders challenged the conventional wisdom that the best houses were individualized ones, and they targeted more efficient domestic labor and consumerism as primary examples of the benefits associated with standardization. America's Little House demonstrated, for example, how women's household chores and purchases could be systematized in order to save time and money. For the Better Homes organization, standardized parts and procedures were more than just practical goals; they were democratic pursuits, undertaken with the belief that economical planning could make home improvement available to all.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Buildings & Landscapes-Journal of the Vernacular Architecture Forum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Buildings & Landscapes-Journal of the Vernacular Architecture Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5749/BUILDLAND.24.2.0037\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buildings & Landscapes-Journal of the Vernacular Architecture Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5749/BUILDLAND.24.2.0037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1934年,联邦组织“美国美好家园”(Better Homes in America)在曼哈顿中城一个显眼的地方建造了一座样房。坐落在第39街和公园大道的拐角处,美国的小房子在近一年的时间里每天都吸引着人群。“美好家园”的领导者们用样板房作为教育示范,来说明标准化的组件和方法是如何使家庭装修变得更容易、更便宜的。其中许多想法都受到弗雷德里克·w·泰勒(Frederick W. Taylor)科学管理哲学的启发,该哲学最初旨在提高工业工作的效率,但在两次世界大战之间的时代,它被广泛应用于其他领域,包括家居装修。美国的小房子是联邦政府的一个重要试验场,联邦政府召集了一个建筑、室内设计、景观美化和家政领域的专家团队,提出了一个通用的计划,可以用来改善任何房子。通过这种方式,Better Homes的领导者挑战了传统观念,即最好的房子是个性化的房子,他们将更高效的家庭劳动力和消费主义作为标准化相关好处的主要例子。例如,美国的小房子展示了如何将女性的家务和购物系统化,以节省时间和金钱。对于美好家园组织来说,标准化的部件和程序不仅仅是实际的目标;它们是民主的追求,相信经济计划可以使所有人都有机会改善家庭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
One Standardized House for All: America's Little House
The federal organization Better Homes in America built a model house in a conspicuous Midtown Manhattan location in 1934. Standing on the corner of 39th Street and Park Avenue, America's Little House drew daily crowds during its nearly one-year run. Better Homes leaders used the model house as an educational demonstration to illustrate how standardized components and methods could make home improvement easier and cheaper. Many of these ideas were inspired by Frederick W. Taylor's philosophy of scientific management, which was originally designed to make industrial work more efficient, but was broadly applied to other fields, including home improvement, during the interwar era. America's Little House was an important testing ground for the federal government, which assembled a team of experts in the fields of architecture, interior design, landscaping, and housekeeping to come up with universal plans that could be used to improve any house. In this way, Better Homes leaders challenged the conventional wisdom that the best houses were individualized ones, and they targeted more efficient domestic labor and consumerism as primary examples of the benefits associated with standardization. America's Little House demonstrated, for example, how women's household chores and purchases could be systematized in order to save time and money. For the Better Homes organization, standardized parts and procedures were more than just practical goals; they were democratic pursuits, undertaken with the belief that economical planning could make home improvement available to all.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Buildings & Landscapes is the leading source for scholarly work on vernacular architecture of North America and beyond. The journal continues VAF’s tradition of scholarly publication going back to the first Perspectives in Vernacular Architecture in 1982. Published through the University of Minnesota Press since 2007, the journal moved from one to two issues per year in 2009. Buildings & Landscapes examines the places that people build and experience every day: houses and cities, farmsteads and alleys, churches and courthouses, subdivisions and shopping malls. The journal’s contributorsundefinedhistorians and architectural historians, preservationists and architects, geographers, anthropologists and folklorists, and others whose work involves documenting, analyzing, and interpreting vernacular formsundefinedapproach the built environment as a windows into human life and culture, basing their scholarship on both fieldwork and archival research. The editors encourage submission of articles that explore the ways the built environment shapes everyday life within and beyond North America.
期刊最新文献
A Detroit Story: Urban Decline and the Rise of Property Informality by Claire W. Herbert (review) Building Antebellum New Orleans: Free People of Color and Their Influence by Tara A. Dudley (review) “The Strange Artistic Genius of This People”: The Ephemeral Art and Impermanent Architecture of Italian Immigrant Catholic Feste Hiring Out: Enslaved Black Building Artisans in North Carolina Dreaming the Present: Time, Aesthetics, and the Black Cooperative Movement by Irvin J. Hunt, and: Freedom Farmers: Agricultural Resistance and the Black Freedom Movement by Monica M. White (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1