种植体连接对混合基牙修复中应力分布的影响

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Osseointegration Pub Date : 2019-08-28 DOI:10.23805/JO.2019.11.03.08
Jpm Tribst, A. D. Piva, L. Anami, A. Borges, M. Bottino
{"title":"种植体连接对混合基牙修复中应力分布的影响","authors":"Jpm Tribst, A. D. Piva, L. Anami, A. Borges, M. Bottino","doi":"10.23805/JO.2019.11.03.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim This study evaluated the influence of prosthetic connection type (external hexagon [EH], internal hexagon [IH] and morse taper [MT]) on the stress distribution in an implant-supported prosthesis. \nMaterials and methods Using modeling software, three sets were formed according to the prosthetic connection composed of ceramic crown, mesostructure, abutment, abutment screw, implant, cement layers and bone tissue. Solids were imported to the analysis software and bone model was fixed in the base. All materials were considered isotropic, linearly elastic and homogeneous. The static load (500 N, 30°) was applied in the central fossa. Stress distribution data were obtained according to Von-Mises and microstrain criteria. \nResults The type of prosthetic connection influenced the stress distribution. The stresses for the IH and MT connections were concentrated on the implant and abutment; for EH at the implant, abutment screw, at the implant platform, and at the cement layer between abutment and mesostructure. There is lower influence for the crown and mesostructure, with more promising results for the MT connection. For the bone tissue, all connections showed the same strain pattern. Stress peaks of 148, 142 and 138 MPa in the implant, 134, 129 and 62 MPa in the screw, and 86, 118 and 131 MPa were observed respectively for EH, IH and MT. \nConclusions The morse taper connection showed promising performance with lower stress concentration in the abutment screw, implant platform and cement layers.","PeriodicalId":42724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osseointegration","volume":"57 1","pages":"507-512"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of implant connection on the stress distribution in restorations performed with hybrid abutments\",\"authors\":\"Jpm Tribst, A. D. Piva, L. Anami, A. Borges, M. Bottino\",\"doi\":\"10.23805/JO.2019.11.03.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim This study evaluated the influence of prosthetic connection type (external hexagon [EH], internal hexagon [IH] and morse taper [MT]) on the stress distribution in an implant-supported prosthesis. \\nMaterials and methods Using modeling software, three sets were formed according to the prosthetic connection composed of ceramic crown, mesostructure, abutment, abutment screw, implant, cement layers and bone tissue. Solids were imported to the analysis software and bone model was fixed in the base. All materials were considered isotropic, linearly elastic and homogeneous. The static load (500 N, 30°) was applied in the central fossa. Stress distribution data were obtained according to Von-Mises and microstrain criteria. \\nResults The type of prosthetic connection influenced the stress distribution. The stresses for the IH and MT connections were concentrated on the implant and abutment; for EH at the implant, abutment screw, at the implant platform, and at the cement layer between abutment and mesostructure. There is lower influence for the crown and mesostructure, with more promising results for the MT connection. For the bone tissue, all connections showed the same strain pattern. Stress peaks of 148, 142 and 138 MPa in the implant, 134, 129 and 62 MPa in the screw, and 86, 118 and 131 MPa were observed respectively for EH, IH and MT. \\nConclusions The morse taper connection showed promising performance with lower stress concentration in the abutment screw, implant platform and cement layers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Osseointegration\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"507-512\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Osseointegration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23805/JO.2019.11.03.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osseointegration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23805/JO.2019.11.03.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

目的研究假体连接类型(外六边形[EH]、内六边形[IH]和莫尔斯锥度[MT])对种植体支撑假体应力分布的影响。材料与方法利用建模软件,根据义肢连接组成三组:陶瓷冠、介体结构、基牙、基牙螺钉、种植体、水泥层、骨组织。将实体导入分析软件,将骨模型固定在底座上。所有材料都被认为是各向同性、线弹性和均匀的。在中央窝处施加静载荷(500 N, 30°)。根据Von-Mises准则和微应变准则获得应力分布数据。结果义肢连接方式对应力分布有影响。IH和MT连接的应力集中在种植体和基牙上;对于种植体、基牙螺钉、种植体平台以及基牙与介观结构之间的胶结层的EH。冠状结构和细观结构的影响较小,而MT连接的结果更有希望。对于骨组织,所有连接都显示出相同的应变模式。EH、IH、MT的应力峰值分别为148、142、138 MPa、134、129、62 MPa、86、118、131 MPa。结论莫尔斯锥度连接在基牙螺钉、种植平台、水泥层的应力集中较低,具有良好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of implant connection on the stress distribution in restorations performed with hybrid abutments
Aim This study evaluated the influence of prosthetic connection type (external hexagon [EH], internal hexagon [IH] and morse taper [MT]) on the stress distribution in an implant-supported prosthesis. Materials and methods Using modeling software, three sets were formed according to the prosthetic connection composed of ceramic crown, mesostructure, abutment, abutment screw, implant, cement layers and bone tissue. Solids were imported to the analysis software and bone model was fixed in the base. All materials were considered isotropic, linearly elastic and homogeneous. The static load (500 N, 30°) was applied in the central fossa. Stress distribution data were obtained according to Von-Mises and microstrain criteria. Results The type of prosthetic connection influenced the stress distribution. The stresses for the IH and MT connections were concentrated on the implant and abutment; for EH at the implant, abutment screw, at the implant platform, and at the cement layer between abutment and mesostructure. There is lower influence for the crown and mesostructure, with more promising results for the MT connection. For the bone tissue, all connections showed the same strain pattern. Stress peaks of 148, 142 and 138 MPa in the implant, 134, 129 and 62 MPa in the screw, and 86, 118 and 131 MPa were observed respectively for EH, IH and MT. Conclusions The morse taper connection showed promising performance with lower stress concentration in the abutment screw, implant platform and cement layers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Osseointegration
Journal of Osseointegration DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sealing ability of a bioceramic sealer used in combination with cold and warm obturation techniques Screw-retained restoration of a facially shifted postextraction implant in the esthetic zone with immediate provisionalization Evaluation of marginal bone loss around SLActive implants by CBCT using different implant dimensions and surgical approaches: A clinical and radiological prospective study A minimally invasive approach to osseo-disintegrate implants via thermal energy. An in-vivo pilot study Biomechanical behavior of the dental implant macrodesign in mandibular implant-supported overdentures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1